Dose-Dense Chemotherapy Improves Both Overall And Progression-Free Survival In Advanced Ovarian Cancer
Main Category: Ovarian CancerAlso Included In: Women's Health / Gynecology; Cancer / Oncology
Article Date: 22 Sep 2009 - 0:00 PDT
Women given a more intensive 'dose-dense' regimen of chemotherapy survive longer and have a higher-rate of progression free survival, concludes an Article published Online First in an upcoming edition of The Lancet. The Article is written by Dr Noriyuki Katsumata, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan, and colleagues.
Paclitaxel and carboplatin given every 3 weeks is currently considered standard first-line chemotherapy for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer. Paclitaxel and carboplatin have been combined with other drugs, given either concurrently or sequentially, in the hope of prolonging survival in women with advanced ovarian cancer, but the results of several randomised trials have been disappointing. Dose-dense weekly administration of paclitaxel is another strategy to enhance antitumour activity and prolong survival. In this study, the authors compared a conventional regimen of paclitaxel and carboplatin with a dose-dense weekly regimen in women with advanced ovarian cancer.
Patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer, fallopian tube cancer, or primary peritoneal cancer were eligible for this phase III randomised controlled trial at 85 centres in Japan. Patients given six cycles of either paclitaxel (180 mg/m²; 3-h intravenous infusion) plus carboplatin, given on day 1 of a 21-day cycle (conventional regimen; n=320), or dose-dense paclitaxel (80 mg/m²; 1-h intravenous infusion) given on days 1, 8, and 15, plus carboplatin given on day 1 of a 21-day cycle (dose-dense regimen; n=317). The primary endpoint was progression-free survival.
Median progression-free survival was longer in the dose-dense treatment group (28 months) than in the conventional treatment group (17 months). Overall survival at 3 years was also higher in the dose dense regimen group (72%) than in the conventional treatment group (65%). Expressed another way, women assigned to the dose-dense regimen had a 29% lower risk of disease progression and a 25% lower risk of death than those given the conventional regimen. 165 patients assigned to the dose-dense regimen and 117 assigned to the conventional regimen discontinued treatment early. Reasons for participant dropout were balanced between the groups, apart from withdrawal because of toxicity, which was higher in the dose-dense regimen group than in the conventional regimen group (n=113 vs n=69). Most patients in both groups experienced neutropenia (reduced white blood cell count). Severe anaemia was higher in the dose-dense treatment group (214 [69%]) than in the conventional treatment group (137 [44%]).
The authors say that the survival benefits shown in the dose-dense group are rare in women with advanced ovarian cancer. They conclude: "Dose-dense weekly paclitaxel plus carboplatin improved survival compared with the conventional regimen and represents a new treatment option in women with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer."
In an accompanying Comment, Dr Michael A Bookman, Arizona Cancer Center, Tucson, AZ, USA, says that confirmatory trials are now underway regarding dose-dense regimens. He concludes: "The use of such dose-dense therapy should be decided on an individual basis together with other options for women with advanced-stage ovarian cancer."
Link to article and comment
Source
The Lancet
Visit our ovarian cancer section for the latest news on this subject.
MLA
13 Feb. 2012. <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/164638.php>
APA
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/164638.php.
Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.
|
Rate this article: (Hover over the stars then click to rate) |
Patient / Public: |
or |
Health Professional: |
Visitor Opinions In Chronological Order (1)
Low-Dose Chemotherapy
posted by Gregory D. Pawelski on 6 Oct 2009 at 6:44 amI've always felt the way my wife was treated for her cancer back in 1972 was the reason she survived so long (twenty-four years before a recurrence). By giving chemotherapy more often, at lower doses, it can prevent the regrowth of blood vessels that feed tumors."
Her postoperative chemotherapy regimen was among the slowest acting and least toxic of the alkylating agents (pill-dose). Depression of the immune system was slow and reversible, allowing it to regenerate and contribute to recovery. A malfunctioning immune system can fail to stop the growth of cancer cells.
The lower-dose regimen may have attacked the blood vessels that fed the tumor (although not known at the time). Her type of treatment sounded very similar to the Angiogenesis and Low Dose Chemotherapy treatment that is finding increasing acceptance in some cancer centers today.
She also may have had some of her own anti-angiogenesis predisposition. In fact, it has been shown that low-dose chemotherapy induces an anti-angiogenic effect (sometimes referred to as 'metronomic' chemotherapy), the protocol mechanism that Judah Folkman discovered.
Unlike standard chemotherapy, which is given in high doses to kill as many cancer cells as possible, the lower-dose regimen is meant to attack the blood vessels that feed the tumor. Tumors create their own supply lines by secreting substances that stimulate the formation of new blood vessels and researchers suspect that frequent low doses of certain drugs may disrupt the growth of those new vessels, starving the tumor.
This approach to treatment is based on something that can frequently occur in people, when a tumor becomes resistant to chemotherapy and high doses stop working. It is believed that angiogenesis plays a role. Angiogenesis is essential to the survival of many tumors. Many chemotherapy drugs, in addition to killing tumor cells, also fight angiogenesis.
But, if these medicines stop angiogenesis, chemotherapy should work better than it does. Blood vessel cells are less likely than tumor cells to become resistant to chemotherapy, so if cancer cells become drug resistant, these medicines should still be able to shrink tumors by destroying their blood supply.
The reason chemotherapy was not stopping angiogenesis was that chemotherapy is usually given in big doses, with breaks of several weeks between doses to let the body recover. During the breaks, the tumor's blood vessels could grow back. By giving chemotherapy more often, at lower doses, it might prevent the regrowth of blood vessels and kill the tumor or at least slow its growth.
This study seems to confirm it. I'm glad more researchers are finding out more about the way it happens and what players are involved so more cancer patients can benefit from these kind of treatment protocols.
Add Your Opinion
Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.
If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.
All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)
Contact Our News Editors
For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.
![]()
Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:
Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.




