Pregnant Women Should Not Eschew H1N1 Vaccine, Antiviral Drugs, Experts Write In New York Times Opinion Piece
Main Category: Swine FluAlso Included In: Pregnancy / Obstetrics; Immune System / Vaccines
Article Date: 30 Sep 2009 - 2:00 PDT
| Patient / Public: | ![]() |
3 (2 votes) |
| Healthcare Prof: | ![]() |
2 (2 votes) |
As the "second wave" of H1N1 influenza gets underway, "the usual mode of thinking about pregnancy and medications threatens to make a worrisome situation worse," three medical experts caution in a New York Times opinion piece. The authors include Anne Drapkin Lyerly, an associate professor of obstetrics and gynecology at Duke University; Margaret Little, director of the Georgetown Kennedy Institute for Ethics; and Ruth Faden, director of the Johns Hopkins Berman Institute of Bioethics.
Drapkin Lyerly, Little and Faden write that pregnant women typically "are deluged with advice about things to avoid" -- from caffeine to sushi -- with the "overriding caveat" being, "'Don't take it, don't use it, don't do it.'" Although in most cases this mentality is "merely inconvenient and anxiety producing, ... in the case of pandemic influenza, it may be deadly" if pregnant women forgo vaccination against H1N1 or fail to take antiviral drugs out of fear of harming a fetus.
The opinion piece cites a study published this summer in the Lancet that found "strikingly high rates of death and of complications like pneumonia in pregnant women with H1N1 infection." According to the study, pregnant women have a fourfold risk of hospitalization, "sometimes with a tragic outcome," as "all the pregnant women who died had been relatively health to begin with," the opinion piece says. Because of these risks, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has placed pregnant women at the top of the priority list for the H1N1 vaccine and recommended that pregnant women start antiviral medications as soon as possible after exposure to the virus and onset of flu symptoms.
"But if experience is any indication, forceful recommendations may not be enough to overcome reluctance among pregnant women and those who care for them," according to Drapkin Lyerly, Little and Faden. The opinion piece notes that one study found that only 15% of pregnant women receive the seasonal flu vaccine, the lowest percentage of any adult group for whom the vaccine is recommended. The Lancet study showed that many pregnant women with flu symptoms were not treated soon enough, with delays ranging from six to 15 days from the onset of symptoms and two to 14 days from the time of a doctor visit.
According to the opinion piece, "This is a sadly familiar pattern." The authors write that "[a]fter the thalidomide disaster of the 1960s, and the very real concerns it raised about the impact of drugs on fetal development, many ended up viewing the use of any medicine by pregnant women as anathema." Because of this, "doctors and women alike often eschew or discontinue medications for serious illnesses, even when the harms of untreated disease, for women and the children they bear, are worse than any risk of medications," Drapkin Lyerly, Little and Faden write. They continue that "even when the evidence is clear, pregnant women find it hard to fight against the 'don't take it, don't use it, don't do it' mentality" and that "obscured from view are the risks of the disease itself."
Drapkin Lyerly, Little and Faden recommend that "[e]very effort needs to be made to alert pregnant women and clinicians about the special risks of H1N1 in pregnancy," as well as "the reasoning behind these important recommendations, including both the limits of what we know and the reasons that concern for pregnant women is now so great." They also write that the "key to success, now and in the future, will be the conduct of research that is specific to the needs of pregnant women," adding that the "urgent threat of H1N1 flu has brought into sharp relief the fact that pregnant women can and should be protected through research, not from it." The authors note that studies are underway to examine the effect of the H1N1 vaccine and antiviral drugs in pregnant women.
"If there was ever a time to rewrite the playbook on how to think about drugs, vaccines and pregnancy, this is it," the authors state, concluding that the "lives of women and babies depend on it" (Drapkin Lyerly et al., New York Times, 9/29).
Reprinted with kind permission from http://www.nationalpartnership.org. You can view the entire Daily Women's Health Policy Report, search the archives, or sign up for email delivery here. The Daily Women's Health Policy Report is a free service of the National Partnership for Women & Families, published by The Advisory Board Company.
© 2009 The Advisory Board Company. All rights reserved.
Visit our swine flu section for the latest news on this subject.
MLA
16 Feb. 2012. <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/165657.php>
APA
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/165657.php.
Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.
|
Rate this article: (Hover over the stars then click to rate) |
Patient / Public: |
or |
Health Professional: |
Add Your Opinion
Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.
If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.
All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)
Contact Our News Editors
For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.
![]()
Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:
Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.




