Genetic Variation Of Certain Enzyme Associated With Clinical Outcomes Among Women With Breast Cancer Treated With Tamoxifen
Main Category: Breast CancerAlso Included In: Genetics
Article Date: 07 Oct 2009 - 2:00 PDT
| Patient / Public: | ![]() |
4 (1 votes) |
| Healthcare Prof: | ![]() |
5 (2 votes) |
| Article Opinions: | 1 posts |
Among women with early stage breast cancer, genetic variation of a certain enzyme appears to be associated with clinical outcomes for women treated with tamoxifen, according to a study in the October 7 issue of JAMA.
"Tamoxifen has been the gold standard for the last 25 years for endocrine treatment of breast cancer. It is estimated that the lives of half a million women have been saved with adjuvant [supplemental] tamoxifen therapy," according to background information in the article. The growth inhibitory effect of tamoxifen is mediated by its metabolites, 4-hydroxytamoxifen and endoxifen. The formation of active metabolites is brought about by the polymorphic cytochrome P450 2D6 (CYP2D6) enzyme. "Approximately 100 CYP2D6 genetic variants have been identified, which manifest in the population in 4 distinct phenotypes, extensive (normal activity), intermediate (reduced activity), poor (no activity), and ultrarapid (high activity) metabolism, and a gene-dose effect with respect to endoxifen plasma concentrations has been demonstrated. Thus, it can be speculated that genotype-related differences in the formation of active metabolites influence therapeutic response to tamoxifen."
Werner Schroth, D.Phil., of the Dr. Margarete Fischer-Bosch-Institute of Clinical Pharmacology, Stuttgart, Germany, and colleagues conducted a study to determine whether CYP2D6 variation is associated with clinical outcomes in women receiving tamoxifen as a supplemental treatment. The study included 1,325 patients who had diagnoses of stage I through III breast cancer between 1986 and 2005 and who were mainly postmenopausal (95.4 percent). Last follow-up was in December 2008, and the median (midpoint) follow-up time was 6.3 years. DNA from tumor tissue or blood was genotyped for CYP2D6 variants associated with reduced or absent enzyme activity. Women were classified as having an extensive (n = 609), heterozygous extensive/intermediate (n = 637), or poor (n = 79) CYP2D6 metabolism.
The researchers found higher breast cancer event rates in patients with reduced or absent CYP2D6 function vs. extensive metabolism patients. "At 9 years of follow-up, the recurrence rates were 14.9 percent for extensive metabolizers, 20.9 percent for heterozygous extensive/intermediate metabolizers, and 29.0 percent for poor metabolizers, and all-cause mortality rates were 16.7 percent, 18.0 percent, and 22.8 percent, respectively," the authors write. Compared with extensive metabolizers, heterozygous extensive/intermediate metabolizers had a 40 percent increased risk of recurrence; poor metabolizers had nearly twice the risk.
"Compared with extensive metabolizers, those with decreased CYP2D6 activity (heterozygous extensive/intermediate and poor metabolism) had worse event-free survival and disease-free survival, but there was no significant difference in overall survival."
"Genotyping has the potential for identification of women who have the CYP2D6 poor metabolism phenotype and for whom the use of tamoxifen is associated with poor outcomes, thus indicating consideration of alternative forms of adjuvant endocrine therapy," the authors conclude.
JAMA. 2009;302[13]:1429-1437.
Source
Journal of the American Medical Association
Visit our breast cancer section for the latest news on this subject.
MLA
15 Feb. 2012. <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/166430.php>
APA
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/166430.php.
Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.
|
Rate this article: (Hover over the stars then click to rate) |
Patient / Public: |
or |
Health Professional: |
Visitor Opinions In Chronological Order (1)
I'm Glad I Insisted On The Test
posted by Kay Harold on 8 Oct 2009 at 7:58 amI am a Medical Technologist. I was diagnosed with Stage I breast cancer in Aug. 2008. I also have a Masters in Health Informatics. Through research on PubMed, I started seeing articles about the CYP2D6 test. I ask my oncologist about getting this test.
She said "its still experimental" and said that I didn't need to have it. I could not take the aromatase inhibitors due to severe adverse reactions to Arimidex and Femara. Tamoxifen was then started. I had side effects but not as severe.
I wanted to know that it was worth it to take something that made me feel this bad most of the time. I insisted that I have the test whether she supported it or not. My test was done at the Mayo Clinic in Jan. 2009. I am a normal metabolizer.
As a medical laboratory scientist, this information gave me the incentive to put up with the side effects in an attempt to reduce the chances of a recurrence. It appears the evidence is growing to support this type of analysis. In this situation, I felt that my knowledge was ignored and I have sent changed to another oncologist.
Add Your Opinion
Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.
If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.
All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)
Contact Our News Editors
For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.
![]()
Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:
Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.





