30 Senate Dems Demand Public Option In Health Reform Legislation
Main Category: Health Insurance / Medical InsuranceArticle Date: 12 Oct 2009 - 1:00 PDT
| Patient / Public: | ![]() |
5 (3 votes) |
| Healthcare Prof: | ![]() |
5 (1 votes) |
| Article Opinions: | 2 posts |
Thirty Senate Democrats on Thursday asked Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) to include a government-administered public health insurance plan option in the final health reform bill that he delivers to the chamber floor, Roll Call reports. Whether to include a public option will be among "several crucial decisions" Reid and the White House will face next week as they attempt to merge the Senate Finance Committee's reform bill with the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee's bill (Drucker, Roll Call, 10/8). The Senate Finance Committee is scheduled to vote Tuesday on its bill, which does not include a public option. The HELP measure, as well as the House health reform bills, do include a public option (Young, The Hill, 10/8).
The letter was signed by several vocal proponents of the public option, including Sens. Jay Rockefeller (D-W.Va.), John Kerry (D-Mass.) and Maria Cantwell (D-Wash.). Sen. Sherrod Brown (D-Ohio) circulated the letter (Roll Call, 10/8).
The letter said, "The Senate Finance Committee included a cooperative approach to insurance market competition. While promoting more co-ops may be a worthy goal, it is not realistic to expect local co-ops to spring up in every corner of this country" (Frates, "Live Pulse," Politico, 10/8). It continued, "We have spent the better part of this year fighting for health reform that would provide insurance access and continuity to every American in a fiscally responsible manner," adding, "We are concerned that -- absent a competitive and continuous public insurance option -- health reform legislation will not produce nationwide access and ongoing cost containment." The senators wrote, "For that reason, we are asking for your leadership on ensuring that the merged health reform bill contains a public insurance option" (Roll Call, 10/8).
Meanwhile, Senate HELP Committee Chair Tom Harkin (D-Iowa) is expressing confidence that final reform legislation will include a public option, The Hill reports. "It's one thing to vote on a bill specifically dealing with something and then another thing to vote on a comprehensive bill that might include" a public option, Harkin said during an interview on C-SPAN's "Newsmakers" that is scheduled to air on Sunday (The Hill, 10/8).
He said that public opinion polls show that there is strong support for the public option, adding that it should fall on opponents to remove the public plan through amendments on the Senate floor (Herszenhorn, "Prescriptions," New York Times, 10/8). "The bill should go forward and then when we get on the floor and there are amendments offered to change the public option or to modify it or to do away with it, well then [the public option's supporters are] going to have to vote as they see fit," Harkin said. He also noted that three House committees and the HELP Committee have supported bills with a public option (The Hill, 10/8).
Reprinted with kind permission from http://www.nationalpartnership.org. You can view the entire Daily Women's Health Policy Report, search the archives, or sign up for email delivery here. The Daily Women's Health Policy Report is a free service of the National Partnership for Women & Families, published by The Advisory Board Company.
© 2009 The Advisory Board Company. All rights reserved.
Visit our health insurance / medical insurance section for the latest news on this subject.
MLA
11 Feb. 2012. <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/166997.php>
APA
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/166997.php.
Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.
|
Rate this article: (Hover over the stars then click to rate) |
Patient / Public: |
or |
Health Professional: |
Visitor Opinions In Chronological Order (2)
Public Option Gives An Option
posted by renee cheree on 14 Oct 2009 at 4:14 pmRepublicans list all these options they are giving Americans.
Yet you still have to make so much money, fit in a category, some Americans don't have the option to select their options. I don't make enough money to afford private healthcare. I am not middle class and I am not poor enough for Medicaid. I am in health care limbo and I want public option the Americans that don't want it already have health insurance let the rest of us have that option.
Public Option Drives Competition
posted by James Trout on 17 Oct 2009 at 8:21 amAs a healthcare provider with my own private practice. I too know the headaches of the current healthcare system. I am a medicare provider and I must say....Medicare is a great insurer, payment is a 14 day turn around, medicare does have it rules to follow which at times are tough, however they require little time of my support staff which in essence decreases the healthcare cost (less support staff needed).
From a Provider standpoint, I resent private insurance especially in the past 2 years, the policies change frequently, the name on the card is not necessary the actual company managing that person's insurance payments. I belong to a provider network that is suppose to manage a set of private insurances that I am supposively "in network." My support staff still has to check if that person's insurance is "in network" because the policy may be different even though the name on the card shows a name that I am "in network." Do not get me started on HMO and pre authorization, this is a total waste of time of my support staff, furthermore I am sick of insurance companies exploiting providers to provide overly cheap healthcare for example: medicare payment for a 97110 code "therapeutic exercise" is about $27.00 per 15 minutes, Some privatized medicare HMO plans try to get you to accept $17.00 per 15 minutes which is totally unrealistic. If you think this sounds OK, remember healthcare practitioners! Medicare requires you to provide that care to the patient direct one to one and not a technician. So my business runs off of medicare and an ethically running business would make 27.00 X 4 per hour = 108.00/hr. Great right! remember I have to pay a front desk person for scheduling, chart up keep, I have rent on commercial Lease, expenses of supplies and equipment, Pay the professional coder/biller, and yes pay myself verses $17.00 x 4 = 68.00/hr yeah that I could bill and treat ethically with that amount per hour....I would have to close my doors.
Sorry for the rant, but time for Health Insurance companies to stop taking large bonuses and follow a more efficient business model and stop trying to exploit providers. Since private insurance companies have had plenty of opportunity to regulate themselves we see how poorly that has turned out for the people of this country.... dropped, changed benefits, pre existing conditions. Providers have plenty of regulation why not insurance companies?
Add Your Opinion
Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.
If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.
All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)
Contact Our News Editors
For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.
![]()
Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:
Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.



