Current Safety Equipment May Not Be Adequate For Nanoprotection

Main Category: Biology / Biochemistry
Also Included In: Public Health
Article Date: 14 Oct 2009 - 4:00 PDT

email icon email to a friend   printer icon printer friendly   write icon opinions  

Current Article Ratings:

Patient / Public:5 stars

5 (1 votes)

Healthcare Prof:5 stars

5 (1 votes)


Writing in a forthcoming issue of the International Journal of Nanotechnology, Canadian engineers suggest that research is needed into the risks associated with the growing field of nanotechnology manufacture so that appropriate protective equipment can be developed urgently.

Patricia Dolez of the Department of Mechanical Engineering, at the Ecole de technologie superieure, in Montreal and colleagues point out that skin is not an impervious membrane. This is the reason that protective clothing and gloves, in addition to respirators, are often an essential and common sight in the chemical industry. However, they wonder if standard protection against chemical risks is enough for workers who are handling nanomaterials.

According to the most recent estimates from the U.S. National Science Foundation, the nanotechnology market could reach as much as $1 trillion by 2011/2012. This, says Dolez, corresponds to about 2 million workers involved in nano-related activities. She adds that it has already been shown that nanoparticles may affect biological activity through oxidative stress at the cellular and molecular levels, although these effects are yet to be manifest as health problems among workers.

The anticipated hazards associated with this incredibly diverse range of substances falling under the general and broad tag of "nanomaterials" remain largely unknown. And, some scientists have suggested that we are vigilant to emerging health problems associated with nanomaterials. The U.S. government recently updated its National Nanotechnology Initiative strategic plan to highlight the need for an assessment of nanomaterials toxicity before production begins.

Dolez and colleagues suggest that as this area of manufacturing grows it would be prudent to develop adequate workplace protection sooner, rather than later. Indeed, those workers most likely to be exposed to nanomaterials will be working in cleaning, bagging and formulation activities as well as surface functionalisation of nanoparticles.

They explain that current regulations and standards testing for protective clothing and equipment are almost devoid of references to nanomaterials specifically. Moreover, although some researchers have concluded that certified respirators offer an appropriate level of protection against nanoparticles, there remain large uncertainties, for example due to the increased potential of leaks at face seal because of the very small size of nanoparticles, a few billionths of a meter.

"Personal protective equipment against nanoparticles" in Int. J. Nanotechnol., 2010, 7, 99-117

Source:
Patricia I. Dolez
Inderscience Publishers

Article adapted by Medical News Today from original press release.
Visit our biology / biochemistry section for the latest news on this subject.
There are no references listed for this article.
Please use one of the following formats to cite this article in your essay, paper or report:

MLA
Patricia I. Dolez. "Current Safety Equipment May Not Be Adequate For Nanoprotection." Medical News Today. MediLexicon, Intl., 14 Oct. 2009. Web.
14 Feb. 2012. <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/167329.php>

APA
Patricia I. Dolez. (2009, October 14). "Current Safety Equipment May Not Be Adequate For Nanoprotection." Medical News Today. Retrieved from
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/167329.php.

Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.


Biology / Biochemistry

Most Popular Articles



Follow Our Biology News On Twitter

Follow Us On Twitter
Get the latest news for this category delivered straight to your Twitter account. Simply visit our Biology / Biochemistry Twitter account and select the 'follow' option.



View list of all 'What Is...' articles »