Lower-Dose Dexamethasone Can Be Used To Treat Newly Diagnosed Myeloma
Main Category: Lymphoma / Leukemia / MyelomaArticle Date: 25 Oct 2009 - 0:00 PDT
'Lower-Dose Dexamethasone Can Be Used To Treat Newly Diagnosed Myeloma'
| Patient / Public: | ![]() |
|
| Healthcare Prof: | ![]() |
4 (1 votes) |
| Article opinions: | 2 posts |
High-dose dexamethasone is a mainstay of therapy for multiple myeloma. However, a study published Online First by The Lancet Oncology concludes that lenalidomide plus low-dose dexamethasone is associated with better short-term overall survival and with lower toxicity than lenalidomide plus high-dose dexamethasone in patients with newly diagnosed myeloma; and is thus a viable treatment option for these patients. The Article is written by Professor S Vincent Rajkumar, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA, and colleagues on behalf of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG), USA.
In this randomised controlled trial, patients with untreated, symptomatic myeloma were assigned to receive lenalidomide 25 mg on days 1-21 plus dexamethasone 40 mg on days 1-4, 9-12, and 17-20 of a 28-day cycle (high dose), or lenalidomide given on the same schedule with dexamethasone 40 mg on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 of a 28-day cycle (low dose). After four cycles, patients could discontinue therapy to pursue stem-cell transplantation or continue treatment until disease progression. The primary endpoint was response rate after four cycles, assessed with European Group for Blood and Bone Marrow Transplant criteria.
The researchers found that 79% of 214 patients receiving high-dose therapy and 68% of 205 patients on low-dose therapy had complete or partial response within four cycles. However, at the second interim analysis at 1 year, overall survival was 96% in the low-dose dexamethasone group compared with 87% in the high-dose group. As a result, the trial was stopped and patients on high dose therapy were crossed over to low-dose therapy. 117 (52%) patients on the high-dose regimen had grade 3 or worse toxic effects in the first 4 months, compared with 76 (35%) of the 220 on the low-dose regimen for whom toxicity data were available. 12 (5%) of 222 on high dose and one (<1%) of 220 on low-dose dexamethasone died in the first four months. The three most common grade three or higher toxicities were deep-vein thrombosis-57 (26%) of 223 versus 27 (12%) of 220; infections including pneumonia-35 (16%) of 223 versus 20 (9%) of 220; and fatigue-33 (15%) of 223 versus 20 (9%) of 220, respectively.
The authors say: "High-dose dexamethasone in a community-setting seems more toxic than low-dose dexamethasone, with more early deaths in the first 4 months, increased risk of thromboembolic complications, and higher overall risk of serious adverse events, particularly in patients older than 65 years."
They conclude: "This trial...shows that low-dose dexamethasone in conjunction with lenalidomide is an active regimen for newly diagnosed myeloma with acceptable toxicity and low early mortality."
They add*: "The results of this trial show that the use of high-dose dexamethasone is not needed for the most part in the context of new active agents for myeloma, and as a result almost all current phase 3 trials have adopted low-dose dexamethasone as the standard in combination regimens."
In an accompanying Reflection and Reaction comment, Professor Antonio Palumbo and Dr Francesca Gay, Divisione di Ematologia dell'Universita di Torino, Turin , Italy say: "The high efficacy and good tolerability of lenalidomide plus low-dose dexamethasone as initial therapy for myeloma has thus been established."
They conclude: "Further randomised phase 3 studies, comparing this regimen with current standards of care such as melphalan-prednisone-thalidomide or melphalan-prednisone-bortezomib, are still needed to verify whether lenalidomide plus low-dose dexamethasone can become a new standard of care for patients with myeloma, and whether the optimal therapeutic strategy should be long-term treatment with lenalidomide and steroids or short-term treatment followed by consolidation with autologous transplantation."
Link to article
Source
The Lancet Oncology
Visit our lymphoma / leukemia / myeloma section for the latest news on this subject.
MLA
25 May. 2012. <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/168549.php>
APA
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/168549.php.
Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.
Visitor Opinions (latest shown first)
Dex versus pred
posted by Pablo Nieto on 24 Oct 2010 at 4:17 amI answer myself. I've increased to 8 mg without any
special sensation.
I conclude that when switching from prednisone to dex,
some infiltrated myeloma cells in marrow were cleansed.
Thus, prednisone cannot fully reach deep or dense
tissues, while dex does. This should be tested in labs.
If true, dex should be used at first instance.
Dexamethasone weekly
posted by Pablo Nieto on 21 Sep 2010 at 7:27 amI find strange the dosage of 40 mg once per week. I take, on my own, only 6 mg for myeloma, plus some herbals and common meds.
Already 6 mg is too much. More than that could make me priapism. I've not even tried. No doctor is ready to give me an advice. I don't know why. No side-effects detected, but I prefer not to take more than once per week. Could anyone tell me a word about?
My treatment is on the web, ready to be consulted.
Ask me for the URL.
Add Your Opinion On This Article
'Lower-Dose Dexamethasone Can Be Used To Treat Newly Diagnosed Myeloma'Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.
If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.
All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)
Contact Our News Editors
For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.
![]()
Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:
Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.





