Prostate Cancer-specific Mortality After Radical Prostatectomy For Patients Treated In The Prostate-specific Antigen Era
Main Category: Prostate / Prostate CancerAlso Included In: Urology / Nephrology; Cancer / Oncology
Article Date: 01 Nov 2009 - 0:00 PDT
| Patient / Public: | ![]() |
2.5 (2 votes) |
| Healthcare Prof: | ![]() |
UroToday.com - In the online edition of the Journal of Clinical Oncology, a multi-institutional study reports on prostate cancer (CaP)-specific mortality after radical prostatectomy (RP) treated since the introduction of PSA.
The study sought to establish a predictive nomogram and modeled the nomogram on 6,398 patients treated with RP at Baylor and MSKCC between 1987 and 2005. External validation of the nomogram was performed on 4,103 patients treated at the Cleveland Clinic and 2,176 patients treated at the University of Michigan. Patients were observed for disease recurrence and death was attributed to CaP using death certificates.
In the modeling cohort, 117 patients died from CaP and 343 died from competing causes over a median follow-up of 48 months. The 15-year prostate cancer specific mortality was 12% and the all-cause mortality was 38%. Results were similar in the validation cohort. Patients lost to follow-up at 5, 10, and 15 years were 17%, 24%, and 16%, respectively. The 5-year PSA progression-free probability (PFP) derived from a nomogram was significantly associated with PCSM. In the most favorable quartile, the 15-year PCSM was 5% compared with 38% in the lowest quartile. When analyzed by previously validated risk groups for PSA recurrence, the 15-year PCSM was 2%, 10% and 19% for patients classified as good risk, intermediate risk, and high risk. Multivariable analysis showed that primary and secondary biopsy Gleason grade 4 and 5 and increasing PSA were associated with PCSM. Patients undergoing RP in more recent times had an improved prognosis. PSA velocity was not associated with PCSM. A nomogram predicting PCSM at 10 and 15 years was constructed and adjusted for the year of surgery.
The externally validated concordance index was 0.82 and predictions closely approximated the actual outcome. The model assumes that patients are treated in the year 2005. Considering all 11,649 patients in both cohorts with complete data, only 1,980 (17%) had a predicted 15-year PCSM greater than 5% and 467(4%) had a probability greater than 30%. Considering the 7,403 patients treated since 1998, 296 (4%) had a probability of PCSM >5% and 37 (0.5%) had a predicted risk greater than 30%.
Stephenson AJ, Kattan MW, Eastham JA, Bianco FJ Jr, Yossepowitch O, Vickers AJ, Klein EA, Wood DP, Scardino PT
J Clin Oncol. 2009 Jul 27. Epub ahead of print.
doi:10.1200/JCO.2008.18.2501
Written by UroToday.com Contributing Editor Christopher P. Evans, MD, FACS
UroToday - the only urology website with original content written by global urology key opinion leaders actively engaged in clinical practice. To access the latest urology news releases from UroToday, go to: www.urotoday.com
Copyright © 2009 - UroToday
Visit our prostate / prostate cancer section for the latest news on this subject.
MLA
13 Feb. 2012. <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/169399.php>
APA
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/169399.php.
Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.
|
Rate this article: (Hover over the stars then click to rate) |
Patient / Public: |
or |
Health Professional: |
Add Your Opinion
Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.
If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.
All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)
Contact Our News Editors
For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.
![]()
Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:
Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.




