The Benefits And Risks Of Preventative Brain Radiation For Lung Cancer Patients
Main Category: Lung CancerAlso Included In: Neurology / Neuroscience; Radiology / Nuclear Medicine; Clinical Trials / Drug Trials
Article Date: 03 Nov 2009 - 6:00 PDT
| Patient / Public: | ![]() |
4 (1 votes) |
| Healthcare Prof: | ![]() |
3.5 (2 votes) |
| Article Opinions: | 1 posts |
A new study is taking a closer look at the benefits versus risks for lung cancer patients to undergo preventative brain radiation therapy as a means to stop cancer from spreading to the brain.
Study results show that while preventative brain radiation for patients with non-small cell lung cancer - the most common form of lung cancer - does reduce the chance of developing brain metastases, it impacts some short-term and long-term memory.
The study also reveals that preventative brain radiation does not increase survival and has no significant impact on quality of life, says study co-investigator Benjamin Movsas, M.D., chair of the Department of Radiation Oncology at Henry Ford Hospital in Detroit.
"These findings offer a more complete perspective regarding this intervention for patients with non-small cell lung cancer," Movsas says. "We now need to develop strategies to help shift the benefit-risk ratio for this treatment."
Dr. Movsas presented the study results Nov. 2 at the plenary session for the 51st annual American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO) meeting. Out of nearly 1,000 abstracts submitted, only a handful of study abstracts, including the one from Henry Ford, were selected for the ASTRO plenary session.
The study is part of a national Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) analysis of prophylactic cranial irradiation for patients with stage III non-small cell lung cancer.
Previous studies have found this preventative type of external beam radiation therapy that treats the entire brain - known as prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) - can reduce the risk of cancer spreading to the brain in patients with non-small cell lung cancer, as well as its sister disease, small-cell lung cancer. The risk of cancer developing in the brain increases as people with non-small cell lung cancer live longer with more effective treatments.
To learn more about how PCI impacts a patient's quality of life and cognitive function, Dr. Movsas and his colleagues tracked the progress of 340 patients with stage III non-small cell lung cancer for one year after receiving PCI, a 10-minute treatment that occurs once a day for two to three weeks.
The study finds that patients with non-small cell lung cancer treated with PCI have a significantly decreased risk of developing brain metastases by 10 percent (from 18 percent to 8 percent), compared with those who did not receive the treatment.
Although there was no significant impact on quality of life, patients who underwent PCI had a greater decline in immediate memory recall and delayed memory recall than patients who did not have PCI.
"This study offers patients a look at both sides of the coin with this treatment, allowing them to make an informed decision about their care," says Dr. Movsas. "Now that we have a more complete perspective and know the challenges, we need to move forward to develop strategies to reduce the risk of neurocognitive changes after brain radiation."
Already a RTOG study is underway to test memantine, a medication approved for Alzheimer's disease, to see if it may help improve memory following brain radiation.
Dr. Movsas notes the potential for exploring other strategies, such as using newer radiation technologies like intensity modulated radiation therapy, for a more precise treatment that will spare parts of the brain associated with memory.
About Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Non-small cell lung cancer is a disease in which cancer cells form in the tissues of the lung. With non-small cell lung cancer, cancer tends to spread in the earlier phase of the disease to other organs, including the brain.
According to the American Cancer Society, about eight to nine out of 10 cases of all lung cancers are the non-small cell type. There are three main sub-types of non-small cell: Squamous cell carcinoma, which make up about 25 percent to 30 percent of all lung cancers; adenocarcinoma, which accounts for about 40 percent of lung cancers and is usually found in the outer part of the lung; and large-cell carcinoma, which accounts for about 10 percent to 15 percent of lung cancers.
Smoking tobacco is the major risk factor for developing lung cancer. Possible signs of lung cancer include a cough that doesn't go away and/or shortness of breath, according to the National Cancer Institute.
Reference: "Phase III Study of Prophylactic Cranial Irradiation versus Observation in Patients with Stage III Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Neurocognitive and Quality of Life Analysis of RTOG 0214." ASTRO 2009.
Funding: National Cancer Institute grants (RTOG U10 CA21661 and CCOP U10 CA37422).
Source: Krista Hopson
Henry Ford Health System
Visit our lung cancer section for the latest news on this subject.
MLA
12 Feb. 2012. <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/169654.php>
APA
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/169654.php.
Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.
|
Rate this article: (Hover over the stars then click to rate) |
Patient / Public: |
or |
Health Professional: |
Visitor Opinions In Chronological Order (1)
Preventative Brain Radiation For Lung Cancer
posted by Gregory D. Pawelski on 17 Nov 2009 at 9:17 pmIn regards to small cell lung cancer (SCLC), if they radiate just the whole brain but not the spinal cord, how does it benefit that patient? Any theoretical cancer cells in the spinal cord would eventually infiltrate the brain.
The benefit of prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) is that the vast majority of central nervous system (CNS) occurrences are in the brain rather than the spine, so while there is some theoretical benefit to treating the spinal cord, there is also greater risk, and the volume at risk is probably low enough that it isn't worth the added risk.
PCI doesn't include the whole spine because it doesn't need to do that. So, while theoretically true that all disease in the brain could contaminate the spinal length, it doesn't seem to do that in reality very often, and certainly not often enough to warrent the widespread use of craniospinal radiation for brain mets or PCI.
What I gather is that the larger the volume treated, the greater the "effect" from radiation. The patterns of recurrence along the spine do not support it. It doesn't seem to recur there very often (on average). So why do it, even if it could contaminate the spine? Doesn't make a lot of sense to me. In regards to non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), there is no proven value of PCI for NSCLC. As the above afirms.
The idea that systemic therapies can be as effective as PCI, whole brain radiation or even stereotactic radiosurgery with a more favorable side effect profile has been looked upon for a number of years now, and one that might be done if the value of agents like Temodar and/or EGFR inhibitors against brain metastases can be established more clearly.
The brain is the most common site of metastatic spread of lung cancer. Accumulating evidence suggests that systemic chemotherapy may play an important role. There have been clinical observations of frequent brain metastasis responses with systemic chemotherapy.
I think they can be established more clearly, if you test the tumor first with cell function analysis. The leading edge of research today is determing how a patient's tumor cells work and hitting those pathways with multiple drugs, simultaneously or sequentially, each chosen because it targets one of those growth, replication and angiogenesis pathways.
Matching tumor type to drug.
Add Your Opinion
Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.
If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.
All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)
Contact Our News Editors
For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.
![]()
Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:
Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.





