More Battles Lie Ahead As Health Reform Debate Swings Back To Senate
Main Category: Health Insurance / Medical InsuranceArticle Date: 10 Nov 2009 - 4:00 PDT
The focus of the health care reform debate is expected to shift back to the Senate this week following the passage of the House reform bill (HR 3962) on Saturday, Politico reports. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) -- who is leading the effort to produce a final Senate bill -- is facing opposition from some Senate moderates, as well as growing pressure from some Democrats and White House officials anxious about the lengthening timeline (Budoff Brown/Raju, Politico, 11/8).
Divisions over abortion funding, which "almost derailed the House vote," are also expected to surface in the Senate, the Wall Street Journal reports. According to the Journal, the House's slim 220-215 endorsement of its bill emphasizes the challenge ahead for Reid and other top Democratic senators, who also have yet to reach a consensus on the financing mechanisms of the bill and whether the package should include a government-run public insurance plan option (Adamy/Bendavid, Wall Street Journal, 11/9).
Reid suggested last week that floor debate on the Senate bill might not begin until after Thanksgiving and that the Congressional Budget Office's delay in providing the score report could push the reform debate into 2010. According to Politico, Reid is aware that "the clock was ticking" on his efforts to send a final bill to the floor, and the House action on Saturday "elevated the stakes" (Politico, 11/9). CBO's score report on the bill is expected by the end of this week (Alonso-Zaldivar, AP/Atlanta Journal-Constitution, 11/9).
On Sunday, Obama said he is "absolutely confident" that the Senate will pass the bill, adding, "I am equally convinced that on the day that we gather here at the White House, and I sign comprehensive health insurance reform legislation into law, they'll be able to join their House colleagues and say this was their finest moment in public service" (Lengell, Washington Times, 11/9).
Jim Manley, a spokesperson for Reid, said that the Senate could use the House vote as a gauge on how to address potential sticking points, including abortion coverage. Manley added, "Clearly it is going to give us momentum. But it does not signify any break in the logjam. It was always going to be close in the Senate, and nothing has changed" (Politico, 11/9). The Senate debate over abortion coverage "has been more muted" than in the House, but Manley acknowledged that the rancor would intensify. " The debate in the House highlighted some of these issues that we're going to have to face here in the Senate, and on this issue in particular, it's something (Reid) is going to have to talk with his caucus about" (MacGillis, Washington Post, 11/9).
Reprinted with kind permission from http://www.nationalpartnership.org. You can view the entire Daily Women's Health Policy Report, search the archives, or sign up for email delivery here. The Daily Women's Health Policy Report is a free service of the National Partnership for Women & Families, published by The Advisory Board Company.
© 2009 The Advisory Board Company. All rights reserved.
Visit our health insurance / medical insurance section for the latest news on this subject.
MLA
13 Feb. 2012. <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/170362.php>
APA
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/170362.php.
Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.
|
Rate this article: (Hover over the stars then click to rate) |
Patient / Public: |
or |
Health Professional: |
Visitor Opinions In Chronological Order (1)
If You Believe In Freedom Of Conscience...
posted by Steven Pohorsky on 10 Nov 2009 at 8:53 amIn considering abortion funding, the following context might be helpful. When Roe vs. Wade was decided, it was based in part of a recognition of uncertainty (disagreement) in our land about when human life begins. Even though the right to have an abortion was granted, the government saw that to use tax funds for abortions would violate the freedom of conscience of those who believe that human life begins before birth. Even if you support abortion think of this -- consider how much freedom of conscience there would be if the government required you to pay taxes to support what you believed to be the killing of another human being. Until the debate is settled on when human life begins, for the government to fund abortion amounts to the government taking sides in the debate on when life begins. How much freedom of conscious would that be?
Add Your Opinion
Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.
If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.
All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)
Contact Our News Editors
For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.
![]()
Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:
Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.




