Use Of Performance Enhancers By Athletes More Likely To Lead To Abuse Of Alcohol, Other Drugs
Main Category: Alcohol / Addiction / Illegal DrugsAlso Included In: Sports Medicine / Fitness; Obesity / Weight Loss / Fitness; Anxiety / Stress
Article Date: 12 Nov 2009 - 5:00 PDT
| Patient / Public: | ![]() |
2 (4 votes) |
| Healthcare Prof: | ![]() |
1 (1 votes) |
| Article Opinions: | 2 posts |
College athletes who use performance-enhancing substances may be at heightened risk of misusing alcohol and using recreational drugs as well, according to new research in the Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs.
The study, of 234 male athletes at one university, found that those who used performance enhancers -- ranging from steroids to stimulants to weight-loss supplements -- were more likely to admit to heavy drinking and using drugs like marijuana and cocaine.
Moreover, they also had elevated rates of alcohol- and drug-related problems, such as missing classes, failing tests or getting into fights.
The implication is that many athletes are not only experimenting with recreational drugs and alcohol, but suffering consequences as well, says study co-author Dr. Robert J. Pandina, director of the Center of Alcohol Studies at Rutgers University in Piscataway, New Jersey.
Until now, it had been unclear whether college athletes who use performance enhancers might have any higher risk of misusing other substances. On one hand, Pandina explained, many athletes might avoid habits that could threaten their performance on the field. On the other, athletes drawn to performance-enhancing substances might have certain traits -- such as a propensity toward "sensation seeking" -- that make the misuse of alcohol or other drugs more likely.
In their study, the researchers, led by Dr. Jennifer F. Buckman, assistant research professor at the Center of Alcohol Studies, found that nearly one third of the athletes acknowledged using a performance-enhancing substance in the past year. The list included banned substances like steroids, creatine, "Andro," stimulants and weight-loss aids.
As a group, athletes who used performance-enhancing substances reported higher rates of drug and alcohol use. Seventy percent said they had used marijuana and one third admitted to cocaine use, versus 22 percent and 3 percent of athletes who did not use performance enhancers. They also had higher rates of smoking, binge drinking and prescription-drug misuse.
The results also hint at some reasons for the elevated rates of drug and alcohol use. Athletes who used performance enhancers were more likely than nonusers to be natural sensation seekers -- a desire to have new and varied experiences -- but they were also more likely to say they used drugs or alcohol specifically to cope with stress and anxiety.
This, Pandina says, suggest that these athletes often see a "utilitarian value" to using recreational drugs. "They are using them to cope with the problems of day-to-day living."
Pandina points out that although many college students are under pressure, athletes -- particularly those at the most competitive schools -- may face additional stress. He adds that while testing athletes for drugs helps, it is not enough by itself; understanding why some turn to drugs is also key.
"This really says that we have to focus on the motivations for athletes' substance use," Pandina says, "and make them aware of the consequences that are likely to come of it."
Future studies, according to Pandina, should look at whether the same patterns are seen among female athletes and those at colleges with less-competitive sports programs. The athletes in this study came from a large, NCAA Division I university, where performance pressure could be particularly high.
Buckman J. F., Yusko, D. A., White, H. R., & Pandina, R. J. (November 2009) Risk profile of male college athletes who use performance-enhancing substances. Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, 70, 919-923.
Source: Stephanie Smith Peeters
Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs
Visit our alcohol / addiction / illegal drugs section for the latest news on this subject.
MLA
11 Feb. 2012. <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/170756.php>
APA
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/170756.php.
Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.
|
Rate this article: (Hover over the stars then click to rate) |
Patient / Public: |
or |
Health Professional: |
Visitor Opinions In Chronological Order (2)
Creatine
posted by Fred on 7 Jan 2010 at 7:30 pmHi, I am a 15 year old high school football player intrested in biochemistry and biosciences. I feel that creatine monohydrate should be a banned substance in athletics because that is the pure form that is produced by the human body and the kind in your food. Sure it is in small amounts, but still is exposing your body to this type of chemical compound which is why I feel that it is not a dangerous substance and should not be banned just because it can up athletic performance.
It must be taken on a certain regimen though because of how your body is naturally lazy and if it detects a constant source of external creatine then it will stop producing it in the body and bodybuilders and weightlifters who don't know that damage their creatine production systems forever.
Creatine Hydrochloride
posted by Colleen on 8 Jan 2010 at 12:38 pmFred is correct that creatine should not be a banned substance, which it is not. As a matter of fact, it's the one supplement that can give an athlete increased strength and muscle mass similar to steroids, yet it's natural and safe. It is recognized by the NCAA as a product that college athletes can take. What you may not be aware of though is that creatine monohydrate can give people negative side effects, such as bloating, cramping water retention, and GI distress. That's because due to its lack of solubility, creatine monohydrate is not easily absorbed into the body. As a mater of fact, CM manufactures will have you load and cycle off, taking large abounts of the creatine up front, for the first couple weeks, and then cycle off for a couple weeks. The stomach cannot digest these large amounts properly. There is a new creatine molecular formula called CON-CRET creatine hydrochloride (C-HCl), which is the most soluble creatine on the market (proven to be atleast 60% more soluble than CM, according to a creatine uptake study conducted at The University of Nebraska Medical Center. You can see the full study at http://www.con-cret.com. With CON-CRET only small amounts are required for incredible results, only 1/4 tsp of powder (or 1 capsule) per 100 lbs of body weight are required. There is no loading, no cycling, absolutely no side effects!!! It's worth a try, completely pure, concentrated creatine. Perfect choice for young athlets (as well as older), because its pure, safe and no side effects.
Add Your Opinion
Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.
If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.
All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)
Contact Our News Editors
For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.
![]()
Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:
Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.






