ASCO Releases Updated Treatment Guidelines For Patients With Stage 4 Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Main Category: Lung CancerAlso Included In: Cancer / Oncology
Article Date: 17 Nov 2009 - 3:00 PDT
New recommendations on the use of chemotherapy to treat patients with stage 4 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) were issued today by the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO).
The evidence-based clinical practice guideline indicates a patient's physical age should not determine the cancer treatment he/she is given. Instead, ASCO recommends oncologists take other factors into account including physiological age and performance status when determining appropriate treatment for stage 4 NSCLC patients.
The new guideline also makes specific recommendations for first-line treatment of NSCLC including:
- Cisplatin (Platinol) or carboplatin (Paraplatin) may be used for first-line chemotherapy in combination with a second drug, such as docetaxel (Taxotere), gemcitabine (Gemzar), irinotecan (Camptosar), paclitaxel (Taxol), pemetrexed (Alimta) or vinorelbine (Navelbine).
- Bevacizumab (Avastin) is recommended with carboplatin plus paclitaxel in particular circumstances.
- Physicians may consider adding cetuximab (Erbitux) to cisplatin plus vinorelbine in first-line therapy in patients with a tumor which tests positive for EGFR protein.
- Gefitinib (Iressa) may be used as first-line therapy in patients with a tumor which tests positive for an activating EGFR gene mutation.
Recommendations for second-line and third-line treatment include:
- For second-line treatment, the guideline recommends the use of a single drug, eitherdocetaxel, erlotinib, gefitinib or pemetrexed.
- For third-line treatment, the guideline recommends erlotinib if a patient's performance status is 0 to 3 and he/she has not previously received erlotinib or gefitinib.
While patients with a tumor that tests positive for an EGFR mutation may receive certain drugs which target EGFR earlier in the course of their disease, the guideline does not recommend the routine use of molecular markers to choose treatment for patients with NSCLC because there is not enough evidence that doing so extends patients' lives.
The updated guideline also highlights disparities in treating members of minority populations who are diagnosed with lung cancer. Research has shown that only 36 percent of African Americans with stage 4 NSCLC receive first-line chemotherapy. Reasons for these disparities include socio-economic status, access to health services, other existing medical conditions and ineffectual communication between health care providers and patients.
"Ethnic and racial minorities experience worse outcomes compared to whites in all stages of lung cancer, and these disparities are frequently due to communication barriers between doctors and their patients," said Christopher G. Azzoli, MD, co-lead author of the guideline and physician at the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center in New York City. "When patients receive uniform clinical care, these disparities are minimized."
Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer deaths for men and women in the United States, and it is estimated that 159,390 people will die from lung cancer (88,900 men and 70,490 women) in 2009. NSCLC is the most common type of lung cancer, and a stage 4 diagnosis means that the cancer has spread to the opposite lung, and/or to distant sites within the body by way of the bloodstream and is no longer operable. Once released in the blood, NSCLC can spread anywhere in the body, but has a tendency to spread to the brain, bones, liver, and adrenal glands.
ASCO published its first evidence-based clinical practice guideline on treating NSCLC in 1997 and published an update in 2003. In conjunction with the latest update published today, ASCO has developed clinical tools and resources for oncologists that summarize the findings and recommendations. These resources include Decision Aid Tools to help physicians and patients have a better dialogue on the potential benefits, risks, and prognosis of treating stage 4 non-small cell lung cancer with chemotherapy, as well as a slide presentation and a summary in the Journal of Oncology Practice.
The updated clinical practice guideline, decision aid tools, and other resources are available at http://www.asco.org/guidelines/nsclc. ASCO also has developed a corresponding patient guide available on ASCO's patient web site, http://www.cancer.net.
This guideline is being published in the November 16 issue of the Journal of Clinical Oncology (JCO), the semi-monthly peer-reviewed journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), the world's leading professional society representing physicians who treat people with cancer.
Source
American Society of Clinical Oncology
Visit our lung cancer section for the latest news on this subject.
MLA
13 Feb. 2012. <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/171133.php>
APA
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/171133.php.
Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.
|
Rate this article: (Hover over the stars then click to rate) |
Patient / Public: |
or |
Health Professional: |
Visitor Opinions In Chronological Order (1)
Do Molecular Markers Extend Patients' Lives?
posted by Gregory D. Pawelski on 17 Nov 2009 at 8:59 pmDo molecular markers extend patients' lives? No. No diagnostic or laboratory test ever has. This is not what it does.
What is the appropriate standard to judge medical tests?
1. Efficacy (use of tests improves clinical outcomes)
2. Accuracy (the test accurately measures what they are purported to measure)
Diagnostic and laboratory tests are judged by accuracy and reproducibility and never by their effect upon treatment outcomes. Most tests used today have comparable "sensitivities" and "specificities."
Pet Scans were not approved because they saved lives in a controlled clinical trial that compared the outcome of patients who received care with or without the benefit of a Pet Scan.
They were approved because their performance characteristics (sensitivity/specificity) are reproducible, favorable and provide information to treating physicians.
In cancer medicine, no test in oncology has ever been shown in prospective randomized clinical trials to improve patient outcomes. The existing standard has always been the "accuracy" of the test.
This is true for every single test used in cancer medicine, from estrogen receptors to panels of immunohistochemical stains (IHC) to diagnosing and classifying tumor to Her2/neu and CA-125 to cell culture assays to MRI's, CT Scans, Pet Scans, molecular assays, and so on.
The essential "proof" is that all they have to do is have a useful degree of "accuracy," not that the use of the diagnostic test improves clinical outcomes.
Add Your Opinion
Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.
If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.
All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)
Contact Our News Editors
For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.
![]()
Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:
Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.




