Training, Credentialing, Proctoring And Medicolegal Risks Of Robotic Urological Surgery: Recommendations Of The Society Of Urologic Robotic Surgeons

Main Category: Medical Devices / Diagnostics
Also Included In: Urology / Nephrology
Article Date: 01 Dec 2009 - 1:00 PDT

email to a friend   printer friendly   opinions  

UroToday.com - The rapid application of laparoscopic and robotic surgery to radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer has really mirrored that of the laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the early 1990s. It is estimated that in 2009 85% of all radical prostatectomies will be performed robotically. This approach has become the standard of care in many urologic communities around the country but as in the initial years of the laparoscopic choleceptectomy, the robot lacks guidelines for the training and safe application of this new technology to clinical practice.

In this report undertaken by the Society of Urologic Robotic Surgeons (SURS), a literature review was performed on the safety and medical/legal implications of proctoring and the safe introduction of surgical procedures to develop recommendations for robotic assisted radical prostatectomy. The differences between proctoring and preceptoring are outlined by the authors and the medical/legal implications of each are defined.

The authors' hope that this article will serve as a catalyst for the development of guidelines for robotic training and credentialing of surgeons in their medical centers has already occurred. In this regard, the American Urologic Association Laparoscopy and Robotic Surgery Committee is presently in the process of finalizing guidelines for residency training and surgeon activity with regards to basic robotic skills. These guidelines will be very similar to those developed by the SAGES and American College of Surgeons as the Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery (FLS). As this article points out the majority of malpractice claims resulting from robotic surgical errors are due to systems malfunctions. Of 444 closed malpractice claims 75% arose during intraoperative care with systems factors contributing to 82% of the cases, and most of these were due to inexperience or lack of technical competence (41%).

Therefore, it would seem imperative for us to adequately train surgeons on the technical aspects of the equipment that they will be using in their clinical practice. As such, the AUA Basic Robotic Skills Guidelines will address the basic technical knowledge as well as skills required to perform effective and safe robot assisted surgical procedures, and are anticipated to be available on the AUA website in 2010.

Zorn KC, Gautam G, Shalhav AL, Clayman RV, Ahlering TE, Albala DM, Lee DI, Sundaram CP, Matin SF, Castle EP, Winfield HN, Gettman MT, Lee BR, Thomas R, Patel VR, Leveillee RJ, Wong C, Badlani GH, Rha KH, Eggener SE, Wiklund P, Mottrie A, Atug F, Kural AR, Joseph JV; Members of the Society of Urologic Robotic Surgeons.

J Urol. 2009 Sep;182(3):1126-32
10.1016/j.juro.2009.05.042

Written by UroToday.com Contributing Editor Elspeth M. McDougall, MD, FRCSC, MHPE

UroToday - the only urology website with original content written by global urology key opinion leaders actively engaged in clinical practice. To access the latest urology news releases from UroToday, go to: www.urotoday.com

Copyright © 2009 - UroToday

• Additional
• References
• Citations