Abortion-Rights Supporters, Opponents Use Social Networking Tools To Shape Messages
Main Category: AbortionAlso Included In: IT / Internet / E-mail
Article Date: 01 Dec 2009 - 3:00 PDT
Supporters and opponents of abortion rights are using social networking tools -- such as blogs, text messaging, Facebook and Twitter -- to rally grassroots support and keep their constituencies informed about abortion provisions in congressional health reform legislation, The Hill reports.
For abortion-rights supporters, social networking has been a key component in promoting a planned Dec. 2 lobby day involving more than 40 organizations. According to The Hill, social networking tools helped abortion-rights supporters collect more than 97,000 signatures in three days for an online petition against an amendment by Rep. Bart Stupak (D-Mich.) included in the House health reform bill (HR 3962). The amendment would ban any insurance plan, public or private, that receives federal subsidies from offering abortion coverage.
According to Elizabeth Shipp, political director for NARAL Pro-Choice America, social media "allows us to go much broader with our message" and helps the group "get out there in a much bigger way." Kristin Koch, NARAL's deputy director for communications and online strategies, said that hundreds of people have viewed photos of abortion-rights rallies posted on Twitpic or Flickr and that 7,000 people have viewed videos explaining the debate over abortion provisions in health care reform legislation. NARAL's Twitter account has more than 60,000 followers. According to Koch, since the Stupak amendment was adopted, NARAL has seen a 15% jump in the number of "friends" it has on Facebook.
Meanwhile, abortion-rights opponents are using social networking tools to garner support for including language similar to the Stupak amendment in the Senate health reform bill. The National Right to Life Committee has six Facebook pages totaling 21,000 friends. The group also maintains the blog stoptheabortionagenda.com and a Twitter account with 1,100 followers (Snyder, The Hill, 11/27).
Reprinted with kind permission from http://www.nationalpartnership.org. You can view the entire Daily Women's Health Policy Report, search the archives, or sign up for email delivery here. The Daily Women's Health Policy Report is a free service of the National Partnership for Women & Families, published by The Advisory Board Company.
© 2009 The Advisory Board Company. All rights reserved.
Visit our abortion section for the latest news on this subject.
MLA
13 Feb. 2012. <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/172558.php>
APA
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/172558.php.
Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.
|
Rate this article: (Hover over the stars then click to rate) |
Patient / Public: |
or |
Health Professional: |
Visitor Opinions In Chronological Order (1)
Pro-choice
posted by Shemika on 1 Dec 2009 at 6:09 pmI feel that a woman should have a choice or rather or not she want the child because she could have got raped or it could have been a mistake to where she don't have no money or stable to take care of the baby.
Add Your Opinion
Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.
If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.
All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)
Contact Our News Editors
For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.
![]()
Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:
Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.




