Risky Department Of Health Scheme Failing People With MS
Main Category: Multiple SclerosisArticle Date: 02 Dec 2009 - 2:00 PDT
In 2002 the National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE) ruled that certain drugs for the treatment of multiple sclerosis (MS) were not cost effective. In response, the Department of Health (DH) set up an observational study called the Risk Sharing Scheme.
The aim of the study was to observe the effects of these drugs (over a ten-year-period) and if the four drugs in question failed to perform as promised then the manufacturers would share the risk of any potential negative outcomes by subsidising their future cost to the NHS.
The scheme promised to make these drugs available to all those with MS who fitted the study criteria.
Seven years into the scheme; the first two year analysis has been belatedly published in the British Medical Journal online today.
It highlights a series of methodological difficulties with the scheme, which if not addressed will result in its failure.
The MS Society has an additional list of concerns regarding this scheme:
- Prescribing rates for MS drugs are amongst the very lowest in Europe.
- There is evidence that the 4 drugs in question are still subject to a post-code lottery despite the scheme.
- There is evidence that the only NICE approved drug for MS, Tysabri, is subject to a massive post-code lottery. Confusion exists amongst commissioners regarding entitlement to this drug which is not part of the scheme.
- NICE will not update guidance on the drugs pending the outcome of the scheme. The inertia this has created means that the NICE guideline on MS, published six years ago is now chronically out of date.
Simon Gillespie, Chief Executive of the MS Society, said: "This is a deeply frustrating situation. The four drugs involved are not the issue and many have benefitted from taking them. It is the way the scheme has been run that is the problem.
"People with MS and taxpayers deserve much better. Government's approach towards the treatment of 100,000 people with MS across the UK doesn't give them, or their families, confidence for the future.
"We already have evidence that the ineffective operation of the scheme has exacerbated the post code lottery in treatments, for example in prescribing the newer drug Tysabri for people with severe MS.
"Unless the shortcomings of the scheme are addressed rapidly, the introduction of other new therapies for MS is also likely to be delayed.
"MS is a complex condition for which there is no cure. Most people live with their MS for many decades, and it is imperative that people with MS receive the correct treatment at the right time.
"Anything short of this would be a grave injustice to all those with MS, as well as ultimately costing society more for hospital stays and care that could be avoided."
Source
Multiple Sclerosis Society
Visit our multiple sclerosis section for the latest news on this subject.
MLA
16 Feb. 2012. <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/172673.php>
APA
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/172673.php.
Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.
|
Rate this article: (Hover over the stars then click to rate) |
Patient / Public: |
or |
Health Professional: |
Visitor Opinions In Chronological Order (1)
Multiple Sclerosis
posted by Joyce on 30 Dec 2009 at 11:09 amUntil the medical community stops the non-treating physician opinions of diagnosis of Multiple Sclerosis over the treating physicians, patients will continue to have failure of the system.
Diagnosis by treating physicians must become the important issue!
Laws protecting MS patients' health have to be changed to insure that treatment will be available. Currently, debates that influence against treatment for MS patients, have denied resources of early treatment. The general attitude has been "no real proof of disease" when in fact medical records have confirmed the diagnosis of MS. To many MS patients continue to develop progressive MS due to the lack of knowledge by unqualified physicians and limited access to care. The average MS patient diagnosis has been five years or more. This causes disability issues that do not go away. The disgrace of lack of radiologist training to recognize MRI lesions, the lack of neurological certification in MS, still is a major contribution in delay of diagnosis.
The financial ruin still occurs even before diagnosis for MS patients. This then leaves little alternative for treatment of the disease. Multiple Sclerosis is an expensive disease, but the disease is more than financial. Having the disease without resources is a for many a death sentence.
Knowing that the disease attacks the central nervous system throughout the body which causes complications of failure of internal organs, patients are overcome many times without hope.
We have allowed the dictation of insurance companies to deny benefits and created a manipulation of at risk for those who desperately need help. Until these known issues are approached and overcome, we will still have discrimination against those with Multiple Sclerosis.
Add Your Opinion
Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.
If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.
All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)
Contact Our News Editors
For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.
![]()
Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:
Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.




