Confirmation Of Hamilton To Appeals Court Signals Hope For Ending Nomination Battles, Opinion Piece Says
Main Category: Litigation / Medical MalpracticeArticle Date: 03 Dec 2009 - 3:00 PDT
| Patient / Public: | ![]() | |
| Healthcare Prof: | ![]() |
Although the "machinations" surrounding the confirmation of U.S. Appeals Court Judge David Hamilton -- including a GOP filibuster attempt -- "might seem to continue the long-standing confirmation wars, the developments could actually help end these perennial battles," Carl Tobias, a professor at the University of Richmond School of Law, writes in a Baltimore Sun opinion piece.
Tobias writes that with 98 federal court vacancies to fill, President Obama "made use of good practices to swiftly nominate" Hamilton, who "had compiled an excellent 15-year District Court record" and earned the support of the American Bar Association and the conservative Federalist Society. Obama also worked to secure the support of Hamilton's home-state senators -- Indiana Democrat Evan Bayh and Republican Richard Lugar -- before announcing the nomination. Despite his record and bipartisan support, Hamilton was attacked as a controversial nominee by Sen. Jeff Sessions (R-Ala.), who attempted a filibuster. Ten Republicans joined the Democratic caucus in defeating the filibuster effort.
According to Tobias, "Despite the Sturm und Drang, the Hamilton confirmation offers hope for ending the confirmation wars." He writes, "Obama must redouble his substantial efforts to consult with GOP and Democratic senators prior to actual nominations," adding, "Democrats should ensure comprehensive floor debates, principally as substitutes for filibusters." Tobias also recommends that Republicans "be receptive to consultation by offering frank advice on candidates, even suggesting prospects whom they deem superior, and to thorough floor debates by eschewing filibusters and agreeing to votes." He concludes, "Republicans and Democrats should seize this opportunity to cooperate and fill the 98 vacancies, so that the federal courts might have the full complement of jurists needed to adequately deliver justice" (Tobias, Baltimore Sun, 11/30).
Reprinted with kind permission from http://www.nationalpartnership.org. You can view the entire Daily Women's Health Policy Report, search the archives, or sign up for email delivery here. The Daily Women's Health Policy Report is a free service of the National Partnership for Women & Families, published by The Advisory Board Company.
© 2009 The Advisory Board Company. All rights reserved.
Visit our litigation / medical malpractice section for the latest news on this subject.
MLA
11 Feb. 2012. <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/172828.php>
APA
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/172828.php.
Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.
|
Rate this article: (Hover over the stars then click to rate) |
Patient / Public: |
or |
Health Professional: |
Add Your Opinion
Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.
If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.
All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)
Contact Our News Editors
For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.
![]()
Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:
Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.



