YouTube As Source Of Prostate Cancer Information
Main Category: Prostate / Prostate CancerAlso Included In: IT / Internet / E-mail
Article Date: 06 Dec 2009 - 0:00 PDT
| Patient / Public: | ![]() |
4 (2 votes) |
| Healthcare Prof: | ![]() |
UroToday.com - Half of patients faced with a decision related to prostate cancer (CaP) will use the Internet for information. YouTube is a popular Internet video site with over 100 million viewers daily. Sources and quality of data on sites like YouTube are not disclosed. In the online edition of Urology, Dr. Peter Steinberg and colleagues assessed the accuracy, quality and bias of English language CaP related videos that appear on YouTube.
The authors searched YouTube for videos on PSA testing, radiotherapy, and surgical therapy for CaP. Videos were abstracted if they were ten minutes or less in length and not patient testimonials. Two urology residents analyzed each video's informational and scientific content, rating it as excellent, fair or poor. Bias was graded as for, against, or neutral. Disagreements were arbitrated by a third, more senior urology resident. Criteria were applied as definitions for each of the rating scores. Inter observer agreement was calculated as a kappa score.
A total of 228 videos were found. Of those, 26 on PSA testing, 28 on radiotherapy, and 123 on surgery were excluded primarily due to content unrelated to CaP. This left 14 videos on PSA, 5 on radiotherapy and 32 on surgery for analysis. The need for the senior resident to arbitrate was relatively common. Information content was rated as fair or poor in 73% of all videos and the interobserver agreement was well above that expected by chance alone. Regarding bias, 69% of videos were rated as having bias for surgery, radiotherapy, or PSA testing. No video was biased against treatment or PSA testing. The length of surgery and PSA testing videos correlated with the content. Video length was associated with a bias favoring surgery. The authors conclude that YouTube is not a reliable source of CaP information.
Steinberg PL, Wason S, Stern JM, Deters L, Kowal B, Seigne J
Urology. 2009 Oct 6. (Epub ahead of print)
doi:10.1016/j.urology.2008.07.059
Written by UroToday.com Contributing Editor Christopher P. Evans, MD, FACS
UroToday - the only urology website with original content written by global urology key opinion leaders actively engaged in clinical practice. To access the latest urology news releases from UroToday, go to: www.urotoday.com
Copyright © 2009 - UroToday
Visit our prostate / prostate cancer section for the latest news on this subject.
MLA
11 Feb. 2012. <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/173056.php>
APA
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/173056.php.
Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.
|
Rate this article: (Hover over the stars then click to rate) |
Patient / Public: |
or |
Health Professional: |
Add Your Opinion
Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.
If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.
All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)
Contact Our News Editors
For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.
![]()
Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:
Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.




