New Mammogram Guidelines Make 'Good Arguments,' Opinion Piece Says
Main Category: Preventive MedicineAlso Included In: Women's Health / Gynecology; Breast Cancer
Article Date: 24 Dec 2009 - 2:00 PDT
| Patient / Public: | ![]() |
|
| Healthcare Prof: | ![]() |
5 (1 votes) |
"A federal advisory panel recently set off a controversy by recommending that most women without special risk factors delay breast cancer screening until they turn 50, not 40, and that mammograms take place only every other year," Richard Thaler of the University of Chicago writes in a New York Times opinion piece. He adds that although the guidelines "have been called a rash misjudgment and an example of ostrich-like thinking," this "criticism is unfair ... to the scientists who prepared the report."
According to Thaler, the report "makes some good arguments, and a discussion of the underlying numbers and a bit of probability theory may help explain how the scientists reached their conclusions -- and help us evaluate the policy implications." He adds, "Analyzing this problem also highlights the difficulties in gauging health care reform: Should we continue any test that offers some chance of preventing a death, regardless of the odds or the costs associated with the testing?"
The "numbers show that about 2,000 women need to be screened regularly for a decade to avert one breast cancer death," and "during that decade, between four and 20 of these women will be 'overdiagnosed' and get radiation, chemotherapy or a mastectomy unnecessarily," Thaler writes. He adds, "And when you add up a decade of false positives, hundreds of these women will have received false alarms -- and about half of these will have received biopsies." According to Thaler, it is "safe to say that our current medical care system is not designed to do well at making these decisions. Careful medical and scientific recommendations are turned into political footballs, and doctors are often paid for testing and treating and run the risk of being sued or rendered guilt-ridden for not doing so." He concludes, "One can make a good case that we don't want the government making these choices, but few want those decisions made by private insurance companies, either" (Thaler, New York Times, 12/20).
Reprinted with kind permission from http://www.nationalpartnership.org. You can view the entire Daily Women's Health Policy Report, search the archives, or sign up for email delivery here. The Daily Women's Health Policy Report is a free service of the National Partnership for Women & Families, published by The Advisory Board Company.
© 2009 The Advisory Board Company. All rights reserved.
Visit our preventive medicine section for the latest news on this subject.
MLA
13 Feb. 2012. <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/174818.php>
APA
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/174818.php.
Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.
|
Rate this article: (Hover over the stars then click to rate) |
Patient / Public: |
or |
Health Professional: |
Add Your Opinion
Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.
If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.
All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)
Contact Our News Editors
For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.
![]()
Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:
Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.




