Airport Full-Body Scanners And Radiation: ACR Statement
Main Category: Radiology / Nuclear MedicineAlso Included In: Bio-terrorism / Terrorism; Public Health
Article Date: 08 Jan 2010 - 0:00 PDT
|
|
| Patient / Public: | ![]() |
5 (3 votes) |
| Healthcare Prof: | ![]() |
2.4 (5 votes) |
| Article Opinions: | 1 posts |
Amid concerns regarding terrorists targeting airliners using weapons less detectable by traditional means, the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) is ramping up deployment of whole body scanners at security checkpoints in U.S. airports. These systems produce anatomically accurate images of the body and can detect objects and substances concealed by clothing.
To date, TSA has deployed two types of scanning systems:
Millimeter wave technology uses low-level radio waves in the millimeter wave spectrum. Two rotating antennae cover the passenger from head to toe with low-level RF energy.
Backscatter technology uses extremely weak X-rays delivering less than 10 microRem of radiation per scan - the radiation equivalent one receives inside an aircraft flying for two minutes at 30,000 feet.
An airline passenger flying cross-country is exposed to more radiation from the flight than from screening by one of these devices. The National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurement (NCRP) has reported that a traveler would need to experience 2,500 backscatter scans per year to reach what they classify as a Negligible Individual Dose. The American College of Radiology (ACR) agrees with this conclusion.
The ACR is not aware of any evidence that either of the scanning technologies that the TSA is considering would present significant biological effects for passengers screened.
Source:
Shawn Farley
American College of Radiology / American Roentgen Ray Society
Visit our radiology / nuclear medicine section for the latest news on this subject.
MLA
16 Feb. 2012. <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/175340.php>
APA
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/175340.php.
Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.
|
Rate this article: (Hover over the stars then click to rate) |
Patient / Public: |
or |
Health Professional: |
Visitor Opinions In Chronological Order (1)
Hard to Justify a Little More Radiation
posted by Donald C Thiel,Jr, DMD on 15 Nov 2010 at 9:28 pmAirport scanners claim to expose passengers to low doses of radiation but there is no such thing as a safe dose of radiation. Any exposure to radiation regardless of its source can cause damage to DNA resulting in cell mutation . True, exposure in lower doses is statistically less likely to cause damage but as the number of doses increases so increases the chances for DNA damage. I would "Opt Out" and get a pat-down.
Add Your Opinion
Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.
If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.
All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)
Contact Our News Editors
For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.
![]()
Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:
Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.




