Digital Mammograms Deliver Less Radiation Than Film Version, Study Finds
Main Category: Breast CancerAlso Included In: Radiology / Nuclear Medicine
Article Date: 27 Jan 2010 - 5:00 PDT
| Patient / Public: | ![]() |
3 (2 votes) |
| Healthcare Prof: | ![]() |
Digital mammograms deliver an average of 22% less radiation than film mammograms, according to a study partially funded by the National Cancer Institute and published in the American Journal of Roentgenology, Reuters reports. For the study, researchers analyzed the results of the 2005 Digital Mammographic Imaging Screening Trial involving 49,528 women. That trial found that digital mammograms detected up to 28% more cancers than film mammograms in women under age 50 who had not experienced menopause and women with dense breast tissue.
Carol Lee, chair of the American College of Radiology Breast Imaging Commission, said the new study showed that the benefits of digital mammograms "can be achieved with overall a lower radiation dose." She said that the level of radiation from either type of mammogram is not large enough to warrant concern and that women should not avoid recommended mammograms if the digital version is not available in their area. However, in general, lowering the dose of radiation is preferable, she said, adding, "We certainly want to keep radiation doses as low as possible and still achieve the desired goal of a good image" (Steenhuysen, Reuters, 1/22).
Reprinted with kind permission from http://www.nationalpartnership.org. You can view the entire Daily Women's Health Policy Report, search the archives, or sign up for email delivery here. The Daily Women's Health Policy Report is a free service of the National Partnership for Women & Families, published by The Advisory Board Company.
© 2010 The Advisory Board Company. All rights reserved.
Visit our breast cancer section for the latest news on this subject.
MLA
13 Feb. 2012. <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/177231.php>
APA
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/177231.php.
Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.
|
Rate this article: (Hover over the stars then click to rate) |
Patient / Public: |
or |
Health Professional: |
Add Your Opinion
Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.
If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.
All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)
Contact Our News Editors
For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.
![]()
Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:
Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.





