Brain Dopamine Receptor Density Correlates With Social Status
Main Category: Psychology / PsychiatryAlso Included In: Biology / Biochemistry; MRI / PET / Ultrasound; Clinical Trials / Drug Trials
Article Date: 04 Feb 2010 - 2:00 PDT
| Patient / Public: | ![]() |
4.1 (10 votes) |
| Healthcare Prof: | ![]() |
4.89 (9 votes) |
| Article Opinions: | 2 posts |
People have typically viewed the benefits that accrue with social status primarily from the perspective of external rewards. A new paper in the February 1st issue of Biological Psychiatry, published by Elsevier suggests that there are internal rewards as well.
Dr. Martinez and colleagues found that increased social status and increased social support correlated with the density of dopamine D2/D3 receptors in the striatum, a region of the brain that plays a central role in reward and motivation, where dopamine plays a critical role in both of these behavioral processes.
The researchers looked at social status and social support in normal healthy volunteers who were scanned using positron emission tomography (PET), a technology that allowed them to image dopamine type 2 receptors in the brain.
This data suggests that people who achieve greater social status are more likely to be able to experience life as rewarding and stimulating because they have more targets for dopamine to act upon within the striatum.
Dr. Martinez explains their findings: "We showed that low levels of dopamine receptors were associated with low social status and that high levels of dopamine receptors were associated with higher social status. The same type of association was seen with the volunteer's reports of social support they experience from their friends, family, or significant other."
Dr. John Krystal, Editor of Biological Psychiatry commented, "These data shed interesting light into the drive to achieve social status, a basic social process. It would make sense that people who had higher levels of D2 receptors, i.e., were more highly motivated and engaged by social situations, would be high achievers and would have higher levels of social support."
These data also may have implications for understanding the vulnerability to alcohol and substance abuse, as the work of Dr. Nora Volkow, the Director of the National Institute on Drug Abuse, and colleagues suggests that low levels of D2/D3 receptors may contribute to the risk for alcoholism among individuals who have family members who abuse alcohol. The current data suggest that vulnerable individuals with low D2/D3 receptors may be vulnerable to lower social status and social supports, and these social factors have previously been suggested as contributors to the risk for alcohol and substance use.
These findings are particularly exciting because they put human neurobiology into a social context, and we humans are fundamentally social creatures. It is in these social contexts that the biological effects on behavior obtain their real meaning.
Source: Elsevier
Visit our psychology / psychiatry section for the latest news on this subject.
MLA
13 Feb. 2012. <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/178120.php>
APA
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/178120.php.
Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.
|
Rate this article: (Hover over the stars then click to rate) |
Patient / Public: |
or |
Health Professional: |
Visitor Opinions In Chronological Order (2)
Chicken Or Egg
posted by Joseph Bennette on 15 Feb 2010 at 11:08 amChicken or Egg - did many D2/D3 receptors cause an increase in successful social behaviors; or did successful social behaviors cause an increase in D2/D3 receptors over time? The study is unclear to me. I like to think that successful behaviors can cause an increase in D2/D3 receptors - which would, in turn, increase successful social behaviors - which would cause even more D3/D3 receptors... etc. - making the whole process more under conscious control than if we are destined by our receptor count to be rich/poor, successful/failure, etc. This definitely needs much more study.
Fascinating
posted by K Cat on 1 Jul 2010 at 12:14 pmMy only complaint is that you didn't include the title of the research study. I want to look it up!
Add Your Opinion
Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.
If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.
All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)
Contact Our News Editors
For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.
![]()
Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:
Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.





