Preventive Mastectomy Does Not Improve Five-Year Survival In Most Breast Cancer Patients, Study Finds
Main Category: Breast CancerArticle Date: 02 Mar 2010 - 1:00 PDT
| Patient / Public: | ![]() |
1 (1 votes) |
| Healthcare Prof: | ![]() |
5 (1 votes) |
| Article Opinions: | 1 posts |
A preventive mastectomy of a healthy breast does not increase survival rates in most women with cancer in the other breast, although the procedure might prolong survival in a specific subset of patients, according to a new study from researchers at MD Anderson Cancer Center, Time reports. Although previous research has shown that double mastectomy lowers the risk of breast cancer recurrence, the new study is the first to conclude that the procedure is unnecessary for many women, according to Time.
Isabelle Bedrosian, the study's lead author and an assistant professor in MD Anderson's surgical oncology department, said, "We have not had real data to guide us." She added, "We can't sit down with a woman and say, 'If you do this, this is your expected benefit.' And when we don't have those data, then biases become the big drivers of decision making." According to Bedrosian, many physicians and women err toward surgery to be cautious, which has fueled a trend toward unnecessary procedures. Time reports that the rate of double mastectomies rose by 150% from 1998 to 2003.
The study involved 107,000 women undergoing mastectomy for breast cancer. Only patients younger than age 50 with early-stage cancer and estrogen-receptor negative tumor experienced an improvement in their chance of five-year survival -- a group that represents less than 10% of breast cancer patients. The study found that women in this group had a 4.8% increased chance of surviving five years, compared with women who did not have a preventive mastectomy. Bedrosian said, "We hope this study helps women make better decisions," adding that the results "provide some reassurance that perhaps a (preventive) mastectomy is not necessary, perhaps overly aggressive and perhaps a bit too much."
Some experts said the findings were too preliminary to apply to clinical practice. George Sledge, president-elect of the American Society of Clinical Oncology and a professor of medicine at Indiana University, said that factors other than mastectomy could have affected women's survival rates in the study. Women who choose a double mastectomy "may be overall healthier in that they see their physician more frequently, and their physician may be more aggressive in treating their cancer in terms of what chemotherapy they use," he said (Park, Time, 2/25).
Reprinted with kind permission from http://www.nationalpartnership.org. You can view the entire Daily Women's Health Policy Report, search the archives, or sign up for email delivery here. The Daily Women's Health Policy Report is a free service of the National Partnership for Women & Families, published by The Advisory Board Company.
© 2010 The Advisory Board Company. All rights reserved.
Visit our breast cancer section for the latest news on this subject.
MLA
13 Feb. 2012. <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/180769.php>
APA
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/180769.php.
Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.
|
Rate this article: (Hover over the stars then click to rate) |
Patient / Public: |
or |
Health Professional: |
Visitor Opinions In Chronological Order (1)
I Had A Bilateral Mastectomy And Would Do It Again
posted by Martha Lanier on 2 Mar 2010 at 10:44 amI was diagnosed with having a .7 cm Infiltrating Ductal Carcinoma, Stage I almost 2 years ago. Although I was advised I could have a lumpectomy with 6 weeks of radiation, it was my decision to have a bilateral mastectomy with reconstruction. Without a doubt, if I had it to do over, I would do exactly the same thing. With no more information than is available today, I am not willing to gamble. Although having a mastectomy may not guarantee I won't have cancer again, not having a mastectomy doesn't guarantee I won't either. I would rather be proactive and take my chances than to be passive and take the risk.
Add Your Opinion
Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.
If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.
All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)
Contact Our News Editors
For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.
![]()
Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:
Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.





