Early Clamping Of The Umbilical Cord May Interrupt Humankind's First 'Natural Stem Cell Transplant'
Main Category: Pregnancy / ObstetricsAlso Included In: Stem Cell Research; Nursing / Midwifery; Pediatrics / Children's Health
Article Date: 25 May 2010 - 5:00 PDT
|
|
| Patient / Public: | ![]() |
4.72 (18 votes) |
| Healthcare Prof: | ![]() |
4.5 (10 votes) |
| Article Opinions: | 3 posts |
The timing of umbilical cord clamping at birth should be delayed just a few minutes longer, suggest researchers at the University of South Florida's Center of Excellence for Aging and Brain Repair.
Delaying clamping the umbilical cord for a slightly longer period of time allows more umbilical cord blood volume to transfer from mother to infant and, with that critical period extended, many good physiological "gifts" are transferred through 'nature's first stem cell transplant' occurring at birth.
The USF review is published in a recent issue of the Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine (14:3).
"Several clinical studies have shown that delaying clamping the umbilical cord not only allows more blood to be transferred but helps prevent anemia as well," said the paper's lead author Dr. Paul Sanberg, director of the Center. "Cord blood also contains many valuable stem cells, making this transfer of stem cells a process that might be considered 'the original stem cell transplant'."
At birth, the placenta and umbilical cord start contracting and pumping blood toward the newborn. After the blood equilibrates, the cord's pulse ceases and blood flow from mother to newborn stops. In recent Western medical practice, early clamping - from 30 seconds to one minute after birth -- remains the most common practice among obstetricians and midwives, perhaps because the benefits of delaying clamping have not been clear. However, waiting for more than a minute, or until the cord stops pulsating, may be beneficial, the authors said.
Birthing methods have also changed over the last century. Throughout human history and currently in cultures and areas where delivering mothers squat to deliver, gravity helps speed the stem cell transfer. Today, the cord may be clamped early for a number of reasons, including the medical resuscitation and stabilizing of infants or the notion that delaying clamping might lead to adverse effects or, more recently, to quickly facilitate umbilical cord banking.
According to study co-author Dr. Dong-Hyuk Park, the relationship between cord clamping time and the transfer of stem cells needs to be understood through the early weeks of the perinatal period and the process of 'hematopoiesis,' the formation of blood cells that begins as early as two weeks into pregnancy. A transfer of pluripotent stems cells continues throughout pregnancy, however, and for a time through the umbilical cord following delivery.
"Several randomized, controlled trials, systematic reviews and meta-analyses have compared the effects of late versus early cord clamping," said Dr. Park. "In pre-term infants, delaying clamping the cord for at least 30 seconds reduced incidences of intraventricular hemorrhage, late on-set sepsis, anemia, and decreased the need for blood transfusions."
Another potential benefit of delayed cord clamping is to ensure that the baby can receive the complete retinue of clotting factors.
Yet, there is debate and disagreement on early versus later clamping. The side favoring delayed clamping, the authors noted, cite the value of the infant's receiving umbilical cord blood (UCB)-derived stem cells, known to be pluripotent.
"The virtue of the unique and immature features of cord blood, including their ability to differentiate, are well known," added Dr. Sanberg.
The researchers concluded that many common disorders in newborns related to the immaturity of organ systems may receive benefits from delayed clamping. These may include: respiratory distress; anemia; sepsis; intraventricular haemorrhage; and periventricular leukomalacia. They also speculate that other health problems, such as chronic lung disease, prematurity apneas and retinopathy of prematurity, may also be affected by a delay in cord blood clamping.
"There remains no consensus among scientists and clinicians on cord clamping and proper cord blood collection," concluded co-author and obstetrician Dr. Stephen Klasko, senior vice president of USF Health and dean of the USF College of Medicine. "The most important thing is to avoid losing valuable stems cells during and just after delivery."
The authors agreed that delaying cord clamping should appropriately be delayed for pre-term babies and babies born where there is no effort to bank umbilical cords, and for babies born where there is limited access to health care and where nutrition may be poor.
Source:
Dr. Paul Sanberg
University of South Florida Health
Visit our pregnancy / obstetrics section for the latest news on this subject.
MLA
13 Feb. 2012. <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/189803.php>
APA
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/189803.php.
Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.
|
Rate this article: (Hover over the stars then click to rate) |
Patient / Public: |
or |
Health Professional: |
Visitor Opinions In Chronological Order (3)
Jaundice babies
posted by Maria on 18 Nov 2010 at 9:31 pmI notice that the article does not make any mention of what will happen to the additional blood volume. I had originally wanted to delay clamping of my son's cord, but when everything was said and done, it was done right away. Even so, we had to stay for an additional day due to elevated bilirubin levels and then after going home for 24 hours, my son had to return to the NICU for 2 additional days to be under 2 sets of lights to get his bilirubin levels under control (he was admitted to the NICU with a bili of >20).
We joked and said that he was our little Oompa Loompa, but it was very distressing to say the least. All I can think about was what if the cord clamping had been delayed and he had even more blood to break down and filter? I love hearing about alternate ways to do things, but this article is very one sided. I'm not a medical professional by any means, but please make sure you include the possible risks as well as the possible benefits.
Blood volume is baby's blood
posted by Annie on 19 Nov 2010 at 2:54 pmI understand the question about what are the side effects of letting the baby have his blood but this is the baby's own blood. This blood is meant to go somewhere-in a human baby. Babies who will be compromised will have a blood transfusion anyway so why not let them have their own blood to start with instead? Just wanted to say that we cut the cord early in hospital because of the need to do every thing in a timely manner not because it is proven to be best for mother and babies. Hope this makes sense.
No need to clamp for recus, Annie.
posted by Dr. Laura on 20 Nov 2010 at 1:04 pmAt our hospital, with the mother's consent, we like to do resuscitation with the cord still intact in order to let the oxygen-rich blood from the placenta flow into the neonate to maximize fetal outcome; we find that these babies who have their full complement of blood will often need less intervention than those who have had early clamping (including a lower incidence of jaundice).
In addition, delayed clamping prevents blood from being pushed back into the maternal bloodstream while the placenta is still attached, and mom is less likely to become sensitized when there is an Rh incompatibility. There do not seem to be any negative side effects, only positives. I would love to see a study done in this regard to back up our work here.
Add Your Opinion
Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.
If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.
All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)
Contact Our News Editors
For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.
![]()
Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:
Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.




