Malpractice Reformers Get Grants, But Fear Of Lawsuits Remains ER Scourge

Main Category: Litigation / Medical Malpractice
Also Included In: Public Health;  Primary Care / General Practice
Article Date: 22 Jun 2010 - 4:00 PDT

email icon email to a friend   printer icon printer friendly   write icon opinions  

Current Article Ratings:

Patient / Public:4 stars

4 (1 votes)

Healthcare Prof:not yet rated

A New York judge's unusual technique - listening to the families of injured people, knowing something about medicine - for dealing with difficult medical malpractice cases will be among 20 explored with $3 million grants as part of the health overhaul, The Associated Press reports. The judge, Douglas McKeon, said, "I don't discuss settlement offers with families right away. ... I just say, 'Tell me a little bit about your loved one.'" The grants are meant to "find answers to such problems as getting hospitals and doctors to acknowledge mistakes, rather than cover them up, and protecting clinicians who follow best practices and still have something go wrong."

In New York, the pilot will work like this: "Cases that aren't settled by the hospitals will go to a special courtroom staffed by judges trained with a curriculum McKeon helped develop and calls 'Medicine for Judges.' Plaintiffs don't have to settle; they can insist on a jury trial at any point" (Alonso-Zaldivar, 6/21).

The Associated Press, in a separate story: One thing at stake in the current malpractice system is that fear of lawsuits may lead doctors to overtest and overtreat, especially in emergency rooms. "The fast ER pace plays a role, too: It's much quicker to order a test than to ask a patient lots of questions to make sure that test is really needed. ... Patients' demands drive overtesting, too. Many think every ache and pain deserves a high-tech test. ... Refusing those demands creates unhappy patients. And concern that unhappy patients will sue remains the elephant in the emergency room."

All that leaves "ER physicians ... among the top 10 specialists most likely to be sued for malpractice, according to leading doctor and insurers groups." One Texas physician said, "when all hell is breaking loose [in a busy ER], not a lot of doctors feel they can take the time to sit down with the patient [to build trust]." The AP explains, "[t]he result can be extra costs, and potential harm - including side effects from unneeded drugs and increased chances for future cancer from excessive radiation" (Tanner, 6/21).

This information was reprinted from kaiserhealthnews.org with kind permission from the Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation. You can view the entire Kaiser Daily Health Policy Report, search the archives and sign up for email delivery at kaiserhealthnews.org.

© Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation. All rights reserved.



Article adapted by Medical News Today from original press release.
Visit our litigation / medical malpractice section for the latest news on this subject.
There are no references listed for this article.
Please use one of the following formats to cite this article in your essay, paper or report:

MLA
Kaiser. "Malpractice Reformers Get Grants, But Fear Of Lawsuits Remains ER Scourge." Medical News Today. MediLexicon, Intl., 22 Jun. 2010. Web.
15 Feb. 2012. <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/192530.php>

APA
Kaiser. (2010, June 22). "Malpractice Reformers Get Grants, But Fear Of Lawsuits Remains ER Scourge." Medical News Today. Retrieved from
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/192530.php.

Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.


Litigation / Medical Malpractice

Most Popular Articles



Follow Our Litigation News On Twitter

Follow Us On Twitter
Get the latest news for this category delivered straight to your Twitter account. Simply visit our Litigation / Medical Malpractice Twitter account and select the 'follow' option.



View list of all 'What Is...' articles »