Former Leaders Urge Alternatives To 'War On Drugs' In Lead Up To XVIII International AIDS Conference
Main Category: Alcohol / Addiction / Illegal DrugsAlso Included In: HIV / AIDS; Conferences
Article Date: 15 Jul 2010 - 0:00 PDT
Former presidents Fernando Henrique Cardoso (Brazil), Ernesto Zedillo (Mexico) and Cesar Gaviria (Colombia) have announced their endorsement of the Vienna Declaration, the official declaration of the XVIII International AIDS Conference (AIDS 2010) taking place from 18 to 23 July 2010.
The Vienna Declaration seeks to improve community health and safety by calling for the incorporation of scientific evidence into illicit drug policies. The declaration was opened for endorsement by academics and members of the public on 28 June 2010.
"The war on drugs has failed," said Fernando Henrique Cardoso. "In Latin America, the only outcome of prohibition is to shift areas of cultivation and drug cartels from one country to another, with no reduction in the violence and corruption generated by the drug trade."
Authored by an international group of distinguished scientists and experts, the Vienna Declaration highlights the ways that over reliance on drug law enforcement results in a range of health and social harms including growing HIV rates among people who use drugs.
The three former heads of state are the co-presidents of the influential Latin American Commission on Drugs and Democracy, which strives to inform drug policy in the region and to contribute towards more effective, safe and humane drug policies. Joining them in supporting the Vienna Declaration are three other influential Latin American figures - Peruvian writer, journalist and essayist Mario Vargas Llosa, Brazilian writer Paulo Coelho and Sergio Ramírez Mercado, writer and former vice-president of Nicaragua.
"The war on drugs has had such an incredibly negative impact on Latin America, and the fact that the Vienna Declaration is receiving this level of endorsement from former heads of state should serve as an example to those currently in power," said AIDS 2010 Chair Dr. Julio Montaner, President of the International AIDS Society (IAS) and Director of the BC Centre for Excellence in HIV/AIDS (BC-CfE). "I hope that the Vienna Declaration will inspire many more political leaders to cast aside the drug war rhetoric and embrace evidence-based policies that can meaningfully improve community health and safety."
The Vienna Declaration calls on governments and international organizations, including the United Nations, to take a number of steps, including:
- undertaking a transparent review of the effectiveness of current drug policies
- implementing and evaluating a science-based public health approach to address the harms stemming from illicit drug use
- scaling up evidence-based drug dependence treatment options
- abolishing ineffective compulsory drug treatment centres that violate the Universal Declaration of Human Rights
- endorsing and scaling up funding for the drug treatment and harm reduction measures endorsed by the World Health Organization (WHO) and the United Nations
"Instead of sticking to failed policies with disastrous consequences, we must direct our efforts to the reduction of consumption and the reduction of the harm caused by drugs to people and society," said Cardoso. "Repressive policies are firmly rooted in prejudices, fears and ideological visions. The way forward to safeguard human rights, security and health is a strategy of peace not war."
Outside of sub-Saharan Africa, injecting drug use accounts for approximately one in three new cases of HIV. In some areas of rapid HIV spread, such as in Eastern Europe and Central Asia, injecting drug use is the primary cause of new HIV infections. Legal barriers to scientifically proven prevention services such as needle and syringe programs and opioid substitution therapy (OST) mean hundreds of thousands of people become infected with HIV and Hepatitis C every year. The effectiveness of these programs is well-documented, though access to such interventions is often limited in those locations where HIV is spreading most rapidly. According to various scientific reviews conducted by the World Health Organization, the Institute of Medicine (U.S.) and others, these programs reduce HIV rates without increasing drug use.
"We welcome the support of Presidents Cardoso, Zedillo and Gaviria, as well as the many doctors, scientists, researchers and public figures who have already put their support and endorsement behind the Vienna Declaration," said Dr. Evan Wood, founder of the International Centre for Science in Drug Policy (ICSDP) and the Chair of the Vienna Declaration Writing Committee. "This level of support, especially before the conference has started, demonstrates the urgency that global leaders in many disciplines believe we must move towards reforming drug policies."
As an estimated 20,000 conference participants travel to Vienna this week, conference organizers are encouraging them to join the growing call for evidence-based drug policies.
"The approach to drug policy proposed in the Vienna Declaration will prevent new HIV infections and ensure that people who struggle with addiction have access to the medical and support services they need," said Dr. Brigitte Schmied, AIDS 2010 Local Co-Chair and President of the Austrian AIDS Society. "Access to proven interventions and to the highest standard of health are rights that each of us values, including those living with addiction."
The Vienna Declaration was initiated by the IAS, the International Centre for Science in Drug Policy, and the BC Centre for Excellence in HIV/AIDS based in Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Source:
Michael Kessler
International AIDS Society
Visit our alcohol / addiction / illegal drugs section for the latest news on this subject.
MLA
16 Feb. 2012. <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/194695.php>
APA
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/194695.php.
Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.
|
Rate this article: (Hover over the stars then click to rate) |
Patient / Public: |
or |
Health Professional: |
Visitor Opinions In Chronological Order (2)
Drug War Failure is Not an Argument Against the Drug War
posted by Clean Living on 15 Jul 2010 at 10:31 amAbout 3,000 Americans died as a result of drunk driving in the year 2007. Meanwhile, about 16,000 Americans are murdered each year, and 1.3 million American women, and 800,000 American men are assaulted by a significant other annually.
These grim figures have not yet resulted in a chorus of people demanding that drunk driving, murder, and domestic violence be legalized. Indeed, if anything, a spike in the incidence of a certain crime typically leads to demands for a crackdown, and ultimately stiffer penalties for the convicted.
Why, then, do Drug War opponents like to point to the “failure” of criminalized drug use as an argument for legalization?
It’s certainly a favorite argument of Drug War opponents – the claim that the Drug War has “failed,” and that therefore drugs should be legalized. Walter Cronkite, the former president of Brazil, a scribe at commondreams.org, and bassist extraordinaire Sting have all made it in recent years. Here at True/Slant, our own Allison Kilkenny forwarded a similar argument just this week.
Yet the argument makes no logical sense, and is dependent on a flawed understanding of the nature of our legal system.
In the United States, it is understood that prohibitive laws will reduce the incidents of a certain crime, not entirely eradicate it. Only a truly draconian system – a North Korea – aims to completely eliminate any behavior that it criminalizes. Here in the US, we have found a way to strike a balance between liberty and the enforcement of laws. For instance, we will try to catch killers, but we will not subject all American citizens to strip searches to prevent murders from ever happening. We do not consider laws against murder a “failure,” solely because some miscreants continue to kill.
Indeed, when the amount of a certain crime has reached intolerable highs, American law enforcement has traditionally innovated to bring about a reduction. Consider the oft-discussed – but still breathtaking – reduction in New York City’s murder rate. In the 1970s and into the ’80s, America’s largest city suffered from a high violent crime rate. As the criminologist George Kelling remembers it, the city was “racked with crime: murders, burglaries, drug deals, car thefts, thefts from cars.” Strangely, this did not result in New Yorkers demanding that crime, burglary, and car theft be legalized. Rather, New York implemented the innovative “broken windows” theory of policing, and ultimately turned New York into America’s safest big city.
It seems self-evident that the criminalization of hard drugs has at least done something to reduce their use. Does anyone believe that if heroin and cocaine were available at the corner convenience store, no more people would use them than do now? Part of the reason that drinking is so widespread in our society is that booze is readily available in most places. I know this from my own experience – I drink a lot because the opportunities to do so are ample.
But, even if the Drug War is a “failure” in that many people continue to use drugs, this fact does not constitute a logical argument for the legalization of drugs. Drug war opponents need to find another argument. The biggest “failure” is the case that they are trying so desperately to make.
Drug War Failure is an Argument
posted by J.N. Burroughs on 18 Jul 2010 at 11:34 am@Clean Living
Let me count the logical fallacies in your statement and opinion.
First off is your 'Bifurcation Fallacy'. We should not get weak on violent and property crimes therefore we should not get weak on 'drug crimes'. You're trying to say that there is only one or the other, tough on all crimes or weak on all crimes. If we get weak on 'drugs' what's next we get weak on murder? I highly doubt anyone that is advocating an end to the 'drug war' also wants to legalize murder. Nice try...
The next is an 'ad hominem' attack mixed with a 'red herring'. You're implying that all those opposed to the 'drug war' are opposed to any form of law and order, illogical and ignorant of the law. You're attacking the man/men not the argument.
Another is a 'weak analogy' fallacy. Rape and burglary are crimes as are possession of marijuana. Since they are crimes they are the same. Anyone with one ounce of sense can tell this is not the case. Maybe it is you who needs a lesson on law?
Then you throw out another 'red herring' by mentioning North Korea and also murder (again). What exactly does North Korea have to do in relation to arresting over 800k people a year for marijuana in the US? Oh, you're trying to say we are not draconian. If we are not draconian why do we have 5% of the world population but 25% of the prisoners? Why are 1/7 African American males incarcerated for drug crimes?
For someone that likes to claim we have much freedom in this country and make comparisons to North Korea. I ask you this; why is it that people like you should have ownership of my body and mind? True freedom would be for individuals to have ownership of their bodies and minds and put what they see fit in them as long as they're not harming anyone else.
Then once again you go into how New York experienced a crime wave back in the 70's and 80's and the solution was not to legalize murder and burglary. This is also an 'equivocation fallacy'. You are saying that the crack down on property and violent crime worked so a crack down on drugs would also work. Any one that can reason logical can see this reasoning has failed. The appetite for drugs in America is insatiable. We have 'cracked' down on drugs (for example the draconian Rockefeller Laws) but drugs are widespread, cheaper than ever and stronger than ever.
I'm sure you know this statement:
What is the definition of insanity?
Doing the same thing over and over again expecting different results.
For over 40 years since the start of the drug war we have been increasing law-enforcement and locking people away for using drugs. Has it worked? The answer is a simple, no!
The 'war on drugs' has not worked, drugs are cheaper than ever, purer than ever, easy to acquire. Remember drug dealers don't check ID, any high school kid will tell you its much easier to get marijuana then alcohol or tobacco because of this fact.
The drug war has failed, there are alternatives!
First we need to re-think our policies and base our new policies on these four pillars: Science, Compassion, Health and Human rights.
Clean Living would make you believe that decriminalization and legalization are one in the same. Decriminalization just means we are no longer imprisoning drug users, it does not mean heroin will be for-sale in Wal-Mart. Drug dealing will still be against the law and punished.
Do a search on "Portugal Drug Decriminalization."
It's been 10 years since Portugal decriminalized the possession of small amount of drugs. Across the board drug use is down, HIV is down, teen drug use is down and treatment is up. It has been a huge success.
Unfortunately we have people like Clean Living using arguments riddled with fallacies, fear mongering and moral ambiguity.
Drug policy should be based on science, fact and compassion not political and moral ideology and fear mongering.
Add Your Opinion
Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.
If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.
All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)
Contact Our News Editors
For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.
![]()
Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:
Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.






