New Vitamin D Guidelines
Main Category: Nutrition / DietAlso Included In: Bones / Orthopedics
Article Date: 15 Jul 2010 - 0:00 PDT
| Patient / Public: | ![]() |
4.64 (11 votes) |
| Healthcare Prof: | ![]() |
4.67 (9 votes) |
| Article Opinions: | 1 posts |
New and updated guidelines on recommended vitamin D intake have been published this week in the online issue of the Canadian Medical Association Journal (CMAJ).
Dr. David Hanley, professor at the University of Calgary Faculty of Medicine, and member of Osteoporosis Canada's (OC) Scientific Advisory Council, is the lead author of the paper on behalf of Osteoporosis Canada.
"OC's current recommendations on vitamin D intake for Canadians are more than 10 years old, and since then, there has been a lot of new and exciting research in this area," says Hanley, who is also a member of the McCaig Institute for Bone and Joint Health and the Calgary Institute for Population and Public Health (CIPPH) at the U of C. "Because of these research advances, we felt it was time to update OC's 2002 Clinical Practice Guidelines for the treatment and management of osteoporosis."
Vitamin D, often called the sunshine vitamin, is mainly obtained from sun exposure of our skin. However, Canadians are not getting enough. Supplements are necessary to obtain adequate levels because a person's diet has minimal impact. "Canadians are at risk of vitamin D deficiency from October to April because winter sunlight in northern latitudes does not allow for adequate vitamin D production," says Julie Foley, president & CEO of Osteoporosis Canada. "Also, because vitamin D requirements for an individual may vary considerably depending on many factors, it's very important to check with your physician about how much vitamin D you should be taking."
Vitamin D is essential to the treatment of osteoporosis because it promotes calcium absorption from the diet and is necessary for normal bone growth. Some research suggests it may also ward off immune diseases, infection and cancer.
The new guidelines recommend daily supplements of 400 to 1000 IU for adults under age 50 without osteoporosis or conditions affecting vitamin D absorption. For adults over 50, supplements of between 800 and 2000 IU are recommended.
"A daily supplement of 25 mcg (800 IU) should now be regarded as a minimum dose for adults with osteoporosis," writes Hanley with co-authors. "Canadians can safely take daily vitamin D supplements up to the current definition of tolerable upper intake level (50 mcg [2000 IU]), but doses above that require medical supervision."
The authors conclude with a call for research into optimal doses and safe upper limits for vitamin D intake. Despite a great deal of new research in the past decade, these major clinical questions still have not been addressed.
Source:
Marta
University of Calgary
Visit our nutrition / diet section for the latest news on this subject.
MLA
15 Feb. 2012. <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/194706.php>
APA
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/194706.php.
Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.
|
Rate this article: (Hover over the stars then click to rate) |
Patient / Public: |
or |
Health Professional: |
Visitor Opinions In Chronological Order (1)
Not quite right
posted by Gretchen on 31 Jul 2010 at 4:28 pmThe researchers of this article failed to take into account that when one spends 15 minutes in full sun - non-burning due to the time frame - during the 10-2pm time frame, the body will make - regularly - somewhere around 40,000 units of Vitamin D which it will use as needed until the next "body-fix". The idea that 2-3K IU of Vit D is some how "worrisome" is in, itself worrisome. It is completely documented that one does not have to worry about too much VitD until one gets up to the 100K IU leve. Almost impossible to obstain.
For myself: I've been taking and testing my blood level of Vitd for the last two year. I've taken 1,400 mg of VitD/day - EVERY DAY - and taken a blood level Vit D test this spring. Guess what? I was, at 31ng/ml one point away of being possibly deficient. The well-repsected and nationally known VitD research group Dr. Heller et al recommends VitD levels at 50ng/ml and above. So you can see that even though I supplemented i wasn't even CLOSE to an optimal minimal level. VitD has impacts on EVERY ASPECT OF OUR PHYSIOLOGY IN EXTRADORINARILY BROAD AND IMPORTANT WAYS. Do your research!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Add Your Opinion
Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.
If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.
All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)
Contact Our News Editors
For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.
![]()
Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:
Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.






