FDA Panel Recommends Against Avastin For Breast Cancer Treatment
Main Category: Breast CancerAlso Included In: Regulatory Affairs / Drug Approvals
Article Date: 22 Jul 2010 - 3:00 PDT
On Tuesday, the FDA Oncologic Drugs Advisory Committee voted 12-1 to recommend that the agency revoke approval of Avastin for the treatment of breast cancer, citing sparse evidence that the drug benefited patients in two new studies, the New York Times reports (Pollack, New York Times, 7/20).
FDA still needs to make a final decision about whether to revoke Avastin's breast cancer indication, though the agency typically follows its advisory panels' advice. FDA's decision would not affect the drug's approval status for other indications, including brain, colon, kidney and lung cancers. A final ruling is expected by Sept. 17. Avastin -- manufactured by Roche's Genentech unit -- had worldwide sales of $6 billion in 2009 (Corbett Dooren, Wall Street Journal, 7/20).
In 2008, FDA granted Avastin accelerated approval, which allows the agency to approve treatments for life-threatening conditions based on limited proof of effectiveness. Companies must then conduct follow-up studies to validate the initial data and obtain full approval (New York Times, 7/20). The 2008 approval allowed Roche to market Avastin for use in combination with chemotherapy to treat the most common form of advanced breast cancer.
A preliminary study used for the accelerated approval showed that Avastin increased progression-free breast cancer survival by 5.5 months when combined with the chemotherapy treatment paclitaxel. However, two more recent studies found that Avastin had a more modest effect on progression-free survival, extending progression-free survival by less than one month to 2.9 months and showing no effect on overall survival. The new studies also showed that patients who received Avastin experienced more severe side effects (Wall Street Journal, 7/20). The side effects included bleeding, blood clots and gastrointestinal perforations (Richwine, Reuters, 7/20).
According to the Journal, the panel unanimously concluded that the follow-up studies failed to confirm Avastin's clinical benefit (Wall Street Journal, 7/20). The new information shows "there's very little benefit to patients -- with significant toxicity risks and no clear survival benefit," Natalie Compagni Portis, the panel's patient representative, said (Perrone, AP/Atlanta Journal-Constitution, 7/20).
Genentech said in a statement that "Avastin should be an option for patients with this incurable disease" (Wall Street Journal, 7/20).
Reprinted with kind permission from http://www.nationalpartnership.org. You can view the entire Daily Women's Health Policy Report, search the archives, or sign up for email delivery here. The Daily Women's Health Policy Report is a free service of the National Partnership for Women & Families.
© 2010 National Partnership for Women & Families. All rights reserved.
Visit our breast cancer section for the latest news on this subject.
MLA
16 Feb. 2012. <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/195511.php>
APA
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/195511.php.
Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.
|
Rate this article: (Hover over the stars then click to rate) |
Patient / Public: |
or |
Health Professional: |
Visitor Opinions In Chronological Order (1)
One Example of Personalized Medicine
posted by Gregory D. Pawelski on 28 Aug 2010 at 10:57 amAn article appearing in the Journal of Internal Medicine reported that until the Microvascular Viability Assay (MVA) test, there have been the lack of a relevant and practical system for testing anti-microvascular drugs against human tumors in which to discover synergistic anti-microvascular drug combinations.
According to Dr. Larry Weisenthal, MD, PhD., developer of the test, it works by measuring drug effects upon endothelial cells which make up blood vessels. The MVA test is both relevant and practical for use in discovering synergistic drug combinations and identifying which patients are most likely to benefit from which drug combinations.
Dr. Weisenthal says he would like to see the test become available to patients worldwide through service agreements with larger laboratory companies or with a biotechnology company which might develop a testing kit for sale to hospitals and laboratories. He also would like to license the test to pharmaceutical companies for use in new drug development.
It has been suggested perhaps Genentech/Roche should use assays like MVA to identify a potential target population of breast cancer patients that it thinks will benefit from the drug Avastin and then conduct a randomized clinical trial among this group. I couldn't agree more!
Source: J Intern Med 264:275-287, September 2008
Add Your Opinion
Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.
If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.
All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)
Contact Our News Editors
For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.
![]()
Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:
Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.





