FDA Ruling On Avastin A 'Critical Test' For Agency, New York Times Editorial Says
Main Category: Breast CancerAlso Included In: Regulatory Affairs / Drug Approvals
Article Date: 27 Jul 2010 - 2:00 PDT
'FDA Ruling On Avastin A 'Critical Test' For Agency, New York Times Editorial Says'
| Patient / Public: | ![]() |
2 (1 votes) |
| Healthcare Prof: | ![]() |
|
| Article opinions: | 2 posts |
The recent "flameout" of the breast cancer drug Avastin "will pose a critical test" on whether FDA will "have the courage to reverse course when a medical treatment that it approved based on preliminary evidence flops badly in follow-up studies," the New York Times says in an editorial.
In 2008, FDA granted Genetech's Avastin "accelerated approval" to treat breast cancers that have spread to other parts of the body. Such approval is a "hurry-up mechanism" that "allows approval of a drug that has not yet been proved safe and effective in thorough clinical trials but has shown promise that it might benefit patients with life-threatening diseases," the Times says. A single clinical trial showed that when used with another drug, Avastin could slow breast cancer's progression but "did not significantly extend patients' lives," the editorial says. "Now two follow-up trials by the manufacturer have failed to confirm even those meager gains," leading an FDA advisory committee to "quite sensibly" vote 12-1 last week in favor of revoking Avastin's approval as a breast cancer treatment, the Times says.
The Times argues that FDA "has rarely removed drugs that were given accelerated approval and sometimes has failed even to compel completion of follow-up studies." However, "there are signs it may get tougher," the editorial continues, concluding, "With Avastin, the follow-up studies were completed in a timely manner -- with such meager results that withdrawal seems the right response" (New York Times, 7/26).
Reprinted with kind permission from http://www.nationalpartnership.org. You can view the entire Daily Women's Health Policy Report, search the archives, or sign up for email delivery here. The Daily Women's Health Policy Report is a free service of the National Partnership for Women & Families.
© 2010 National Partnership for Women & Families. All rights reserved.
Visit our breast cancer section for the latest news on this subject.
MLA
25 May. 2012. <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/195919.php>
APA
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/195919.php.
Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.
Visitor Opinions (latest shown first)
It cost too much......80K
posted by Lisa Rochelle on 2 Sep 2010 at 6:25 pmGenerally Recognized as Safe and Effective....is the usual standard of approving a drug....where is the outrage here? No significant harmful side effects resulted from a year of AVASTIN and the drug offered hope of a prolonged life and a cure for breast cancer patients. My mother is a 3y4mo survivor. In '07 she had stage III triple negative breast cancer...and today she is cancer free without evidence of metastatic cancer. Funny how the drug is approved for colon and lung cancer, but not breast cancer. Could it be that the cost outweighs the benefit? 1 in 8 women get breast cancer...the older they are, the more likely to have cancer while on Medicare.
The drug costs 80,000. The outrage is that women are suffering a lost chance where the benefit outweighs the risk. Sure, doctors can still treat aggressive breast cancer with Avastin, but off-label use is not likely to be covered by Medicare or commercial insurance carriers when it is has not been approved by the FDA. This seems like prima facia evidence of health care rationing in light of Health Care Reform. Nothing good comes cheap or free....so apparently only those breast cancer victims that have 80,000 to spare will be able to afford the drug in light of the impending FDA ruling.
Yet, everyone will have coverage. Could this seriously be considered a just result under Obamacare? Everyone gets coverage, but what is the quality of that coverage? Seriously, if we all had a right to drive.....would we all be in the safest and highest quality vehicle or we would all be driving around in paper cars? Nothing of quality comes cheap or free, but why is that a women's cancer treatment receives such a quick denial? I smell disparate treatment!!
Nothing courageous about that
posted by Eli on 27 Jul 2010 at 2:41 amTo punish a company for completing it's commitment in a timely fashion and not dragging the follow-up studies for ten years like others have done, is unfair.
To remove a drug, that shows some efficacy and does not do much harm, from the market, is unjustified.
There's nothing courageous about that.
The FDA should leave the current indication as it is.
Add Your Opinion On This Article
'FDA Ruling On Avastin A 'Critical Test' For Agency, New York Times Editorial Says'Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.
If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.
All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)
Contact Our News Editors
For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.
![]()
Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:
Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.





