Limitations To Ultrasound In The Detection And Measurement Of Urinary Tract Calculi
Main Category: Urology / NephrologyAlso Included In: Medical Devices / Diagnostics
Article Date: 02 Aug 2010 - 9:00 PDT
'Limitations To Ultrasound In The Detection And Measurement Of Urinary Tract Calculi'
| Patient / Public: | ![]() |
|
| Healthcare Prof: | ![]() |
3.33 (3 votes) |
UroToday.com - Urinary tract stones are commonly diagnosed and followed by ultrasound (US). Our study highlights several important limitations to the test that should be recognized by the clinician. First, compared with axial unenhanced CT, stone size tends to be overestimated, particularly when up to 10mm. This finding illustrates the danger of using US as the sole diagnostic test when planning treatment. In this setting, surgical intervention could be planned when a more conservative management strategy may be warranted. In part, this effect may be due to the operator-dependent nature of the test and the difficulty in defining the interface between the stone and kidney. Ultrasound measurements should be conducted in a minimum of two orthogonal planes and the maximal length reported. Interestingly, we also found that there was a direct correlation between over-estimation of stone size and distance of the stone from the US transducer. To date, this "lensing" effect has not adequately been explained.

Solitary stone present in the mid pole of the
left kidney. The maximal CT measurement was 4.0mm,
and the maximal US measurement was 7.3mm.
It is not our intention to eliminate the use of US entirely. Instead, US should be limited to the routine follow-up of radiolucent calculi as well as a first-line investigative tool for pediatric and pregnant patients with suspected urolithiasis in whom radiation exposure is undesirable. US may also be of benefit in the evaluation of hydronephrosis and should be considered in patients at risk of repetitive CT scans.
Solitary stone present in the mid pole of the left kidney. The maximal CT measurement was 4.0mm, and the maximal US measurement was 7.3mm.
Written by A. Andrew Ray, Daniela Ghiculete, Kenneth T. Pace and R. John D'A. Honey as part of Beyond the Abstract on UroToday.com. This initiative offers a method of publishing for the professional urology community. Authors are given an opportunity to expand on the circumstances, limitations, etc., of their research by referencing the published abstract.
UroToday - the only urology website with original content written by global urology key opinion leaders actively engaged in clinical practice. To access the latest urology news releases from UroToday, go to: www.urotoday.com
Copyright © 2010 - UroToday
Visit our urology / nephrology section for the latest news on this subject.
MLA
25 May. 2012. <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/196548.php>
APA
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/196548.php.
Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.
Add Your Opinion On This Article
'Limitations To Ultrasound In The Detection And Measurement Of Urinary Tract Calculi'Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.
If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.
All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)
Contact Our News Editors
For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.
![]()
Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:
Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.





