New VBAC Guidelines Give Women More Decision-Making Power, Editorial States
Main Category: Pregnancy / ObstetricsArticle Date: 04 Aug 2010 - 4:00 PDT
|
|
| Patient / Public: | ![]() |
5 (2 votes) |
| Healthcare Prof: | ![]() |
2.67 (3 votes) |
| Article Opinions: | 1 posts |
Although it is "understandable" that some health care providers are "cautious" about vaginal births after caesarean sections, it "should hardly be a controversial notion" that a woman who has had a c-section "should have a say in whether to try a vaginal birth during her next delivery," the Raleigh News & Observer says in an editorial.
According to NIH, one-third of U.S. hospitals and 50% of physicians refuse to allow women to attempt VBACs "due to a fear of lawsuits over uterine ruptures," which occur in 0.7% to 0.9% of cases, the editorial states. "Extremely small as that risk may be, even tiny numbers represent real women and real babies who can suffer serious consequences in a delivery gone bad," it continues.
However, "when up to 80% of women who are 'allowed' to attempt VBAC succeed, it's not so easy to understand why all women aren't 'allowed' to weigh the risks and to make their own choices regarding their own childbirth experiences," the editorial argues. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists " recently eased its guidelines to say that hospitals offering women trial labors after caesareans should have a surgical team 'readily available' instead of 'immediately available,'" the editorials notes.
"It's a small change, but one that might send the precipitously declining VBAC rates headed in the right direction again," the editorial argues, concluding, "Let these new guidelines be the impetus for giving women the information they need to weigh the risks and to be able to choose a trial labor or a repeat caesarean themselves" (Raleigh News & Observer, 7/31).
Reprinted with kind permission from http://www.nationalpartnership.org. You can view the entire Daily Women's Health Policy Report, search the archives, or sign up for email delivery here. The Daily Women's Health Policy Report is a free service of the National Partnership for Women & Families.
© 2010 National Partnership for Women & Families. All rights reserved.
Visit our pregnancy / obstetrics section for the latest news on this subject.
MLA
13 Feb. 2012. <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/196759.php>
APA
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/196759.php.
Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.
|
Rate this article: (Hover over the stars then click to rate) |
Patient / Public: |
or |
Health Professional: |
Visitor Opinions In Chronological Order (1)
It's About Time
posted by Bonnie Anderson on 7 Aug 2010 at 6:35 pmThe trend favoring VBAC is great, but sadly LONG OVERDUE. Providers should not simply "allow" women to go for a VBAC, they should actively ENCOURAGE it. The risks to both mother and baby are lower, the outcomes much better overall.
It is high time to stop practicing in fear of the low percentage worst-case scenarios and instead work harder to achieve the best-case scenarios!
Add Your Opinion
Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.
If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.
All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)
Contact Our News Editors
For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.
![]()
Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:
Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.




