New Report Finds Nearly Half Of States Falling Short On Policies To Prevent And Fight Cancer, USA
Main Category: Cancer / OncologyArticle Date: 06 Aug 2010 - 2:00 PDT
| Patient / Public: | ![]() | |
| Healthcare Prof: | ![]() |
Nearly half of all states are falling short on legislative solutions to prevent and fight cancer, according to a new report released today by the American Cancer Society Cancer Action Network (ACS CAN). However, despite budget crises in several states, some state lawmakers still made positive progress in the fight against a disease that will kill an estimated 569,000 people in the United States this year.
The new report, How Do You Measure Up?: A Progress Report on State Legislative Activity to Reduce Cancer Incidence and Mortality, was released today at the National Conference of State Legislatures annual meeting in Louisville, KY. The report finds that 23 states have reached benchmarks on none or only one of the six legislative priority areas measured by ACS CAN, the advocacy affiliate of the American Cancer Society. No state has met all of the benchmarks for effective cancer-fighting policies.
The report also provides an overview of how passage of the new health care law, the Affordable Care Act, will dramatically change the landscape of state health policy in the coming years.
"In the best interests of their constituents, state legislators should support laws and policies that help people fight cancer by emphasizing disease prevention, making health care affordable and accessible and focusing on patient-centered care during and after treatment," said Christopher W. Hansen, president of ACS CAN. "This duty is all the more important with passage of the Affordable Care Act. Cancer advocates will be working with state legislators to ensure that the new health care system is as strong as possible for people with cancer and their families."
How Do You Measure Up? measures state policies and provides a blueprint for effective legislation on six priority areas: breast and cervical cancer early detection program funding; access to care for the uninsured; colorectal screening coverage laws; smoke-free laws; tobacco prevention program funding; and tobacco taxes. Failure to address these issues places barriers in front of those who seek proper preventive care, diagnosis and treatment of cancer.
A color-coded system is used to identify how well a state is doing. Green represents the benchmark position, showing that a state has adopted well-balanced policies and good practices; yellow indicates moderate movement toward the benchmark and red shows where states are falling short.
No state reached a benchmark in all six issues and only one state - Hawaii - reached benchmarks in five of the six priority legislative areas in the fight against cancer. Seven states - Alabama, Florida, Idaho, Mississippi, Oklahoma, South Carolina and Tennessee - did not meet the benchmark on any of the six issues, and another 16 received high marks on only one issue.
In addition to the six focus areas on which states were rated, the report examines how states are measuring up on issues such as the affordability of health coverage in the individual market and through Medicaid. It also details efforts on pain management as well as state investments in nutrition and physical activity promotion.
Despite budget pressures this past year, some state lawmakers have made positive progress in the fight against cancer. Since July 2009, when the report was last published, 11 states and the District of Columbia have passed tobacco tax increases, bringing to 47 the total number of states with tobacco tax increases since 2002 and increasing the current national average to $1.45 (up from $1.28 in 2009). Research has consistently shown that every 10 percent increase in the price of cigarettes reduces youth smoking by 7 percent and overall cigarette consumption by about 4 percent.
New York now has the highest tax in the nation at $4.35 per pack and is also the first state with a tobacco tax over $4. South Carolina's historic 50-cent increase came after a decade-long battle. Until recently, the state had the lowest tobacco tax in the nation and had not passed an increase since 1977. Missouri now has the lowest tax in the nation at 17 cents.
Early in the year, North Carolina became the first major tobacco growing state to implement a 100 percent statewide smoke-free restaurant and bar law. Three states (Kansas, Wisconsin and Michigan) implemented 100 percent comprehensive smoke-free laws protecting workers and patrons from the hazards of secondhand smoke, bringing to 35 the number of states, in addition to the District of Columbia and Puerto Rico that now require 100 percent smoke-free workplaces and/or restaurants and/or bars. Additionally, more than 3,000 municipalities have local laws in effect that restrict where smoking is permitted. Combined, this represents nearly 79 percent of the U.S. population.
In addition to passing these measures, many state legislatures fought hard to preserve coverage for lifesaving cancer screenings and treatments and to stave off attempts to cut state funds that support these programs, such as the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program. Medicaid coverage for cancer treatments also came under attack, and many state legislatures voted to protect programs that help ensure quality cancer care for those who desperately need it. For example, Idaho successfully increased funding for the Women's Health Check, the state's Breast and Cervical Cancer Screening Program - a major victory considering the current economic climate in the state.
Other findings in the report:
For state-by-state details or a copy of the complete report, please visit www.acscan.org.
Source: American Cancer Society
Visit our cancer / oncology section for the latest news on this subject.
MLA
13 Feb. 2012. <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/196964.php>
APA
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/196964.php.
Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.
|
Rate this article: (Hover over the stars then click to rate) |
Patient / Public: |
or |
Health Professional: |
Add Your Opinion
Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.
If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.
All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)
Contact Our News Editors
For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.
![]()
Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:
Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.




