Finland Bans Tobacco Display In Europe's Toughest Tobacco Control Law
Main Category: Smoking / Quit SmokingArticle Date: 22 Aug 2010 - 1:00 PDT
| Patient / Public: | ![]() |
2.8 (5 votes) |
| Healthcare Prof: | ![]() |
5 (1 votes) |
| Article Opinions: | 6 posts |
ASH congratulates the Finnish president who signed a new law putting tobacco displays out of sight in shops. Finland joins a growing number of countries including Ireland, Canada and Norway that have adopted the measure to protect young people from tobacco marketing. [1] In several jurisdictions, including Scotland and England, tobacco manufacturers have initiated legal challenges to defend this highly effective marketing asset. [2]
The Finnish law does not stop at ending tobacco displays: it also makes it an offence for under 18s to possess tobacco products. Buying cigarettes on behalf of a minor becomes an offence punishable by up to 6 months in prison.
Martin Dockrell, Director of policy and research at the health charity Action on Smoking & Health said:
"Across the UK those who make and sell cigarettes have been fighting tooth and nail to overturn this legislation but the tide is running against them. Laws for smokefree public places started in a few small jurisdictions and rapidly spread across the globe. We are seeing exactly the same process here, the only question is: Will the UK be one of the first major economies to implement a display ban or will it be the first to cave in to tobacco industry pressure and reverse a law that has already been passed by parliament?"
Notes:
[1] To date 5 countries have implemented tobacco display bans: Australia, Canada, Iceland, Ireland and Norway. The ban on tobacco displays in Finland will come into effect on 1 January 2012. A ban on the sale of tobacco products from vending machines will be implemented from 1 Jan 2015.
[2] Legal challenges have been issued in England, Scotland and Norway.
The following is a summary of the new Finnish tobacco law:
The new objective of the Tobacco Act is to put an end to the use of tobacco products in Finland. The purpose is to achieve this aim by preventing in particular children and adolescents from taking up smoking. Finland is the first country to lay down the aim of putting an end to smoking in a law. The Government proposed passing the bill on Wednesday 18 August. The purpose is that the President of the Republic will approve the proposed Act on Friday.
The purpose of the Act is to restrict the marketing and supply of tobacco products especially in the everyday life of children. Not only shops but also private persons may not sell or supply tobacco products to persons under 18. According to the Act, even selling one cigarette or fetching a packet of cigarettes from a shop to a minor person should be interpreted as a tobacco selling violation, for which the person can be fined or sentenced to prison for a maximum of six months. It is also forbidden to offer tobacco without payment to minor persons, but this is not punishable however.
People under 18 are forbidden to import and possess tobacco products. A fine can be imposed on import of tobacco products, but possession is not punishable under the law. In the future, also sellers of tobacco products must be aged at least 18 years.
There will be a total ban on the sale of snuff in Finland, as the ban on import and sale will be extended to also apply to private persons. Ordering snuff e.g. via the Internet will also be forbidden. A maximum of 30 packets, each containing 50 grams snuff, may however be imported for one's own use. It will be forbidden to import snuff as a gift.
The prohibitions against smoking will be extended e.g. in facilities used by children and young people, the joint facilities of apartment house companies, events organised outdoors and hotel rooms.
In the future, tobacco products or their trademarks may not be displayed in retail sale facilities. Customers can at their request be shown a catalogue or be given a printed list of the prices of the tobacco products on sale. Furthermore, the sale of tobacco products from vending machines will be forbidden. The Medicines Act is amended to the effect that nicotine preparations can be sold, besides in shops, kiosks and gas stations, also in restaurants.
The Act enters into force as soon as on 1 October this year. The prohibition on display of tobacco products as well as the restrictions on smoking in hotel rooms enter into force at the beginning of 2012. The vending machines for tobacco products will be forbidden as from the beginning of 2015.
Source:
ASH
Visit our smoking / quit smoking section for the latest news on this subject.
MLA
13 Feb. 2012. <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/198494.php>
APA
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/198494.php.
Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.
|
Rate this article: (Hover over the stars then click to rate) |
Patient / Public: |
or |
Health Professional: |
Visitor Opinions In Chronological Order (6)
An incessant tide of junk science
posted by Dave Atherton on 22 Aug 2010 at 2:12 amIn week where Professor Enstrom was fired from UCLA for daring to speak the truth on the harmlessness of second hand smoke and traffic pollution we now have more Orwellian Newspeak from ASH. Enstrom's departure marks a new low in the suppression of free speech and honest science.
Dr. Patrick Basham's erudite paper (1) makes the convincing case that display bans do not lead to less youth smoking and drive youngsters into the arms of criminals for their supplies. Also 15% of convenience stores closed as a result.
What was most remarkable about the publication of Basham's paper was the intervention of Stefan Hrafn Jonsson the Icelandic Public Health Official. (2) He also liaises with the WHO on the FCTC, so it is hard to smear him with tobacco money. He said that “Few, if any, believe that this reduction is an effect on one factor.”
He also went on to supply this paper (3) "Substance use prevention for adolescents: the Icelandic Model." If you carefully read how they reduced alcohol, drug and tobacco consumption (42% of 15/16 year olds admitted to being drunk in a month for example) was by using parents to patrol streets and peer presure.
There is no mention in the paper at all about the tobacco display ban.
In a week when the USA government has admitted to spending $1 trillion in the last 25 years on the war on drugs (tobacco worldwide is worth $ 500 billion as opposed to $135 for class A drugs) ASH not only take artistic licence on the truth but will be the architects of a new criminal Armageddon.
Display Ban Blindness
posted by F Wilson on 22 Aug 2010 at 5:06 amAnother pointless move by anti-smokers, there is no evidence that a display ban will have any effect on smoking,the Public have now woken up to the anti smoking lobby as with the false claims on secondhand smoke danger,the public now say,Prove the claims or withdraw them. As for the so called "charity" ASH,it is time for their Taxpayer funding to stop,no place in the country for Quangos.
ASH and Display bans
posted by Pete on 22 Aug 2010 at 5:51 amTo date there there has been no clear evidence that display bans would make even the slightest difference in detering youth smoking.
Martin Dockrell conveniently forgets to mention that some of the main areas of opposition is from small shopkeepers that will be forced to spend a few thousand pounds that they can not afford just to suit anti smoking social engineering policy.
The effect on small independent shopkeepers is expected to lead to a closure rate of between 10 to 20 percent of these outlets resulting in misery for the owners their families and the community.
Most retailers of cigarettes are highly responsible and do not knowingly sell to underage youngsters anyway.
Making cigarettes seem like forbidden fruit has already proved to make cigarettes more mystical and is leading to youngsters buying illegal highly dangerous fakes from organised criminals.
The statement in the article "The new objective of the Tobacco Act is to put an end to the use of tobacco products in Finland." mirrors the aim of ASH and its backers eventually eradication of tobacco.
The display should never have even been considered, it is based on no evidence and is just reflects other anti smoking agendas to social engineer out something unacceptable to the few.
It would be in the interest of truth and democracy to have the law reversed by parliament, laws should not be based on ficticious statistics and who can shout the loudest such as Martin Dockrell.
Prohibition doesn't work.
posted by chas on 22 Aug 2010 at 7:26 amAre we going to hide everything that can cause harm? If so, we would have to hide almost everything.
Criminal gangs and terrorists are the only ones profiting from all these restrictions, because they don't care who they sell their wares to. Counterfeit tobacco is far more dangerous than authentic tobacco.
My heart bleeds for those little shopkeepers
posted by Margaret Hogge on 22 Aug 2010 at 4:04 pmMy heart bleeds for all those small shopkeepers who have been longterm willing participants in Big Tobacco's chain of dealing death.
Go claim compensation from your suppliers.
You have known since the 1950's that tobacco kills more than any other single product.
Those shopkeepers should close
posted by Mike Pierce on 4 Sep 2010 at 2:04 pmIf any shop closes due to the lost business from a ban on cigarette displays (advertising), then they were being kept in business by selling a known, dangerous product. In this case, they do not deserve to stay in business, so, good riddance.
Add Your Opinion
Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.
If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.
All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)
Contact Our News Editors
For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.
![]()
Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:
Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.






