Women Receiving Epidural Early in Labor No More Likely To Have C-Section Than Women Receiving Epidural Later, Study Says
Main Category: Women's Health / GynecologyArticle Date: 18 Feb 2005 - 20:00 PDT
'Women Receiving Epidural Early in Labor No More Likely To Have C-Section Than Women Receiving Epidural Later, Study Says'
| Patient / Public: | ![]() |
|
| Healthcare Prof: | ![]() |
4.5 (4 votes) |
Women who receive epidural anesthesia early in labor are no more likely to undergo a caesarean-section delivery than women who receive systemic narcotics for initial pain and do not receive an epidural until later in labor, according to a study published in the Feb. 17 issue of the... New England Journal of Medicine, the Boston Globe reports. Dr. Cynthia Wong, an obstetric anesthesiologist at Northwestern Memorial Hospital, and colleagues at Northwestern University studied 728 women laboring at Prentice Women's Hospital in Chicago between 2000 and 2003 (Johnson, Boston Globe, 2/17). All of the women were giving birth for the first time, and all requested pain medication during labor. The researchers then randomly assigned the women to receive one of two pain-relief methods. The first group received anesthesia injected into their spinal space at first request for pain medication and an anesthetic injection into their epidural space when their cervices were dilated about two inches. The second group received systemic narcotics upon first request for pain medication and did not receive an epidural until their third request for additional pain medication or their cervices had dilated at least four inches, whichever happened first.
Findings
Among women in the
early epidural group, approximately 18% subsequently underwent c-section deliveries, compared with 21% in the delayed epidural group, a difference that
was not statistically significant (Donn, AP/
Long Island Newsday, 2/17). However, the median pain labor pain score as rated by women in the early epidural group was a two on a scale of
one to 10, compared with a median score of six for women in the delayed epidural group. Also, infants born to women in the early epidural group were "
more alert" upon delivery, according to the Chicago Sun-
Times (Ritter, Chicago Sun-Times, 2/17). Although some health professionals have expressed concern that epidural provision slows down
contractions and labor progress, the study found that the average time between epidural provision and full cervical dilation was about 295 minutes for the
early epidural group, compared with 385 minutes for the delayed epidural group (BBC News, 2/17). In addition, women in the early epidural group on average had total labor times that were 90 minutes shorter than the labor
times of women in the delayed epidural group (AP/Long Island Newsday, 2/17).
Researcher Conclusions
"The message of
this is that there is no reason why women who want an epidural should not get it when they first request it," Wong said (Bowman, Scripps Howard/Knoxville News-Sentinel, 2/17). She
added that women often are "pressured" to delay receiving an epidural and made to feel "guilty or weak" if they requested one too early in labor, according
to the New York Times (Grady, New York
Times, 2/17). "Doctors should feel comfortable they're not increasing the risk of their patient getting a c-section by allowing them to get an epidural
earlier in labor," Wong said (Emery, Reuters
i>, 2/16).
ACOG Recommendations
The new study's findings appear to "contradict" previous research that showed women who
received early epidurals required more c-section deliveries than women who delayed receiving epidurals, according to the AP/Newsday (AP/Long
Island Newsday, 2/17). The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
recommends delaying an epidural, when "feasible," until the cervix is dilated at least four centimeters, especially for women giving birth for the first time,
the New York Times reports (New York Times, 2/17). In February 2002, ACOG issued an opinion statement -- following reports that some
medical institutions have policies that restrict women from receiving epidurals until the cervix has dilated to a diameter of at least four to five centimeters --
to clarify its position. ACOG said that a woman who requests an epidural anesthetic to relieve labor pain should receive one regardless of her stage of
labor. Contradictory evidence on whether or not receiving an epidural earlier in pregnancy put women at an increased risk for a c-section delivery
prompted an ACOG task force in 2000 to examine the issue. The task force concluded that epidurals should be delayed when feasible, but its
recommendation specifically stated that providers should not intentionally limit pain relief to women in labor (Kaiser Daily Reproductive Health Report, 2/4/02). ACOG officials said they
are unlikely to change their guidelines in reaction to the study findings because the spinal-epidural combination used in the study is an "uncommon
method" for receiving an epidural, according to the Globe. Approximately 60% of women who give birth in the United States receive an epidural
during labor, according to the Globe (Boston Globe, 2/17).
Reaction, Editorial
Dr. Laura Riley, director of labor and
delivery at Massachusetts General Hospital in Boston, agreed with the ACOG officials, saying
that the type of epidural studied by the Northwestern researchers is "very intricate," adding, "I don't know that many places that can do it." She also said
the study's findings "may just pertain to this group of patients," adding, "It's not clear that this is really generalizable." In an accompanying NEJM editorial, Dr. William Camann, an anesthesiologist at Brigham and Women's Hospital in Boston, wrote that women were "forced to endure extra hours of pain
for no reason and given narcotics that did not work well," according to the Times. "Women in labor deserve to have as many options as possible at
their disposal to ensure a safe and satisfying birth experience both for themselves and for their infants," Camann writes (New York Times, 2/17).
The study's findings "make it clear that safe, effective pain relief with the use of regional anesthetics should not be withheld simply because an arbitrary
degree of cervical dilatation has not yet been achieved," Camann concludes (Camann, NEJM, 2/17).
ABCNews' "World News Tonight":
The program includes comments from Camann (McKenzie, "World News Tonight," ABCNews, 2/16). The complete segment is available online in RealPlayer.
"Reprinted with permission from kaisernetwork.org kaisernetwork.org. You can
view the entire Kaiser Daily Reproductive Health Report, search the archives, or sign up for email delivery at www.kaisernetwork.org/dailyreports/repro The Kaiser Daily Reproductive Health Report is published for
kaisernetwork.org, a free service of The Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation . © 2005 Advisory
Board Company and Kaiser Family Foundation. All rights reserved.
Visit our women's health / gynecology section for the latest news on this subject.
MLA
25 May. 2012. <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/20151.php>
APA
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/20151.php.
Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.
Add Your Opinion On This Article
'Women Receiving Epidural Early in Labor No More Likely To Have C-Section Than Women Receiving Epidural Later, Study Says'Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.
If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.
All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)
Contact Our News Editors
For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.
![]()
Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:
Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.




