Senate Approves Legislation Preventing Insurers, Employers From Discriminating Based on Genetics
Main Category: GeneticsArticle Date: 21 Feb 2005 - 4:00 PDT
The Senate on Thursday voted 98-0 in favor of a bill... (S 306) that would establish protections against genetic discrimination, CQ Today reports (Swindell, CQ Today, 2/17). Under the legislation, sponsored by Sen. Olympia Snowe (R-Maine), employers could not use genetic information in employment decisions, and insurance companies could not deny coverage or establish premium rates based on such information (Kaiser Daily Health Policy Report, 2/11).
House Action
A similar recent House bill, sponsored by
Rep. Louise Slaughter (D-N.Y.), had 242 co-sponsors but never made it through committee. Slaughter said she plans to introduce a new bill that will be
supported by a more aggressive lobbying campaign based on the Senate vote. Rep. John Boehner (R-Ohio), chair of the Education and Workforce Committee, said, "We're looking at what the Senate did and reviewing the issue as we have
the last three or four years. No decision has been made." An unnamed House GOP aide said party leaders want to ensure that the bill "would not launch a
new mandate with unintended consequences" (CQ Today, 2/18). Slaughter said the bill must be passed soon, adding, "The president supports it,
the Senate has passed it overwhelmingly and a majority of the House is ready to vote in favor of the bill. The House leadership has failed to lead on this
issue. It is time for them to get out of the way and allow this bill to become law" (Washington Times, 2/18).
Reaction
Snowe --
citing an NIH report that found about 32% of women decline genetic testing for breast cancer because
of insurance concerns -- said, "It is of critical importance that people do not feel afraid to use available technologies that could save their lives just because
they are worried about losing their health coverage and their jobs" (CQ Today, 2/17). Sen. Christopher Dodd (D-Conn.) said, "It is absolutely
essential that in this time of fantastic scientific advances and discovery that [genetic] information be used for the purpose of preventing, treating and
healing diseases, and not as a basis for discrimination." Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist (R-Tenn.), who has supported the legislation for the past seven
years, said many people avoid genetic testing for fear their employer or insurer will discover negative results. "This bill will also prevent employers from
hiring or firing folks based on their genetic information; it is progressive legislation that prevents it all right upfront," Frist added (DeBose, Washington Times, 2/18). America's Health Insurance Plans, which opposed the previous House legislation, said it supports Snowe's bill, which it believes
would not increase litigation or prevent insurers and hospitals from using genetic information for health reasons.
Opposition
"[P]
owerful business interests" could keep the measure "in limbo," CQ Today reports. The U
.S. Chamber of Commerce, the National Association of Manufacturers and the National Restaurant Association oppose the bill because they say that it would "add to a confusing patchwork
of laws" and possibly "trigger an explosion of lawsuits because it allows for jury trials and punitive and compensatory damages," CQ Today reports.
Neil Trautwein, assistant vice president of human resources policy for the NAM, said, "There is no evidence that employers are presently discriminating on
the basis of genetic information and nothing to support the idea that we might do so in the future." He added, "The House should consign this bill to the
trash heap" (CQ Today, 2/17).
"Reprinted with permission from kaisernetwork.org kaisernetwork.org. You can
view the entire Kaiser Daily Health Policy Report, search the archives, or sign up for email delivery at http://www.kaisernetwork.org/dailyreports/healthpolicy. The Kaiser Daily Health Policy Report is published for
kaisernetwork.org, a free service of The Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation . © 2005 Advisory Board
Company and Kaiser Family Foundation. All rights reserved.
Visit our genetics section for the latest news on this subject.
MLA
15 Feb. 2012. <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/20207.php>
APA
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/20207.php.
Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.
|
Rate this article: (Hover over the stars then click to rate) |
Patient / Public: |
or |
Health Professional: |
Visitor Opinions In Chronological Order (1)
Genetic non-discrimination eliminates EEO
posted by Jay Burns on 23 Feb 2005 at 3:17 amIf this bill passes as stated, I understand that the EEO could finally be deemed against the law since some genetic markers for race/sex provide extra points on employment applications.
Add Your Opinion
Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.
If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.
All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)
Contact Our News Editors
For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.
![]()
Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:
Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.



