States Respond To Increasing Demand For Midwives, Home Births
Main Category: Pregnancy / ObstetricsAlso Included In: Nursing / Midwifery
Article Date: 27 Sep 2010 - 0:00 PDT
'States Respond To Increasing Demand For Midwives, Home Births'
| Patient / Public: | ![]() |
|
| Healthcare Prof: | ![]() |
5 (2 votes) |
| Article opinions: | 3 posts |
An increasing number of pregnant women are eschewing hospital deliveries for home births, prompting some states to consider legislation to license midwives who assist in home deliveries, the New York Times reports.
The number of home births in the U.S. rose by 5% from 2004 to 2005 and held steady at 25,000 in 2006, the last year for which data are available, according to the National Center for Health Statistics. Women who opt for home births cite several reasons, such as religious beliefs or a desire to avoid a caesarean section. A 2008 report co-authored by Childbirth Connection -- a not-for-profit maternal health research organization -- found that medical interventions have increased significantly in the past 20 years, including interventions in low-risk pregnancies. The report said that the number of induced labors doubled from 1990 to 2005, while c-sections rose from 4.5% of U.S. hospital births in 1965 to a current 40%.
Midwifery advocates argue that recent figures showing an increase in the U.S. maternal mortality rate supports their position that a majority of c-sections are unnecessary and possibly dangerous. However, some physicians and medical groups argue that home births carry higher risks than hospital births. Jacques Abramowicz, co-director of Rush University Medical Center's Fetal and Neonatal Medicine Center and a fellow of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, said, "Childbirth is very dynamic, and it can be a very dangerous process." He added, "In the vast majority of cases, nothing happens. However, if an emergency occurs, it happens very fast -- in two, three, four minutes."
Illinois Legislature Considering Midwife-Certification Bill
The issue of how to regulate midwives is playing out in Illinois, where the state Legislature is considering a bill (HB 226) that would license direct-entry midwives, who do not have nursing degrees, the Times reports. Illinois law considers legal home births to be those attended by a physician or a nurse midwife, an advanced-practice nurse with a secondary degree in midwifery.
Home births in Illinois account for 700 to 1,000 births each year, many of them in rural areas, where obstetricians are scarce, according to the state Department of Vital Health Statistics. Licensed home-birth attendants work in only seven of Illinois' 102 counties, leaving a majority of the state home births unattended or attended illegally by someone whose license and education are unregulated. According to the Times, women often register home births as "unassisted" to avoid scrutiny of their midwives.
Supporters of the Home Birth Safety Act -- which passed the Senate in May and is pending in the House -- argue that it strengthens and protects pregnant women and their infants from untrained practitioners. It also allows midwives to practice openly and transport pregnant women to hospitals in emergency cases without fear of reprisal or arrest. Opponents of the measure -- including ACOG, the Illinois State Medical Society and the American Medical Association -- argue that home births are riskier than births in medical settings.
Illinois' midwifery organizations are cautiously optimistic that the measure will pass. Rachel Dolan Wickersham, president of the Coalition for Illinois Midwifery and vice president of the Illinois Council of Certified Professional Midwives, said medical groups' opposition to the measure is "about power and control." She added, "These women are going to have babies at home," adding, "Why would anyone want to keep the situation so that the person attending them has no regulated training or is afraid to transport them to a hospital in an emergency?" (Reaves, New York Times, 9/24).
Reprinted with kind permission from http://www.nationalpartnership.org. You can view the entire Daily Women's Health Policy Report, search the archives, or sign up for email delivery here. The Daily Women's Health Policy Report is a free service of the National Partnership for Women & Families.
© 2010 National Partnership for Women & Families. All rights reserved.
Visit our pregnancy / obstetrics section for the latest news on this subject.
MLA
26 May. 2012. <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/202532.php>
APA
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/202532.php.
Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.
Visitor Opinions (latest shown first)
I hope something changes....
posted by Crystal Rhodes Strickland on 30 Sep 2010 at 12:27 pmI am a previous c-section mommy times two for unnecessary reasons and too many medical interventions. South Carolina law doesn't allow me to home birth unless I do it illegally because I'm a previous section. So I will be attempting a VBAC in a hospital this time around and will have to fight for it with all my being. It's a horrible place to be in and I understand why so many women are doing it off the record.
The Goal of Birth Attendants
posted by Momma Lu on 29 Sep 2010 at 8:43 pmBirth should be about empowering a woman to do her best, to begin (or continue) her greatest job ever, being a parent, with pride, power, and dignity! When Drs ignore a woman's feelings and desires, usually for their own convenience, they are robbing a woman of one of the greatest events of her life! To take away this woman-defining moment, the moment a baby slides naturally from your vagina into your waiting arms, is to truly rob women of their womanhood. I have had 2 completely natural homebirths, one with a midwife, one without. I had lost faith in my midwife; I didn't feel right or comfortable with her anymore. She ignored my wishes, and lost a client. I had a doula and my husband at my second birth.
I agree with the post above... do you really want to push women away? Women feel unsafe, violated, at the very least, uncomfortable, when their Drs, nurses, and midwives ignore their wishes, wants, needs, feelings, and desires. In a birth emergency, I would transport, not to the hospital 5 minutes away (cut-happy butchers), but to the next nearest hospital, 45 minutes away! That's how afraid of this hospital and these Drs I am. And I won't use the nearest midwife because she makes me uncomfortable. For baby #3, due in Dec, I'll have a doula again, actually 2 doulas, which I know isn't exactly the very safest of situations, but it feels the safest and most comfortable to me, since the alternatives DO NOT feel safe or comfortable at all!
Births will be safest when we follow the example of the Dutch... 30% of all births at home, midwives instead of Drs, except in rare emergency or very high-risk cases, midwives and Drs working together for the benefit of women. Legalize direct-entry midwives in all 50 states, and DC, require registration at the very least, and documentation of some kind of education or apprenticeship or experience, and let them be made available to the women who are seeking them out.
Restrict Drs in how many interventions they are allowed to push on women, lower all the intervention stats, especially the outrageous 40% c-sec rate, and give women back the control of their births and their bodies. Drs back-up midwives, hospitals support them, staff members treat them as equals, and all of you treat women like the CEOs of birth that they are. Let's make birth safe and empowering for women, as it is MEANT to be.
Homebirth v. Hospital
posted by Bonnie on 27 Sep 2010 at 7:17 pmIn my personal experience, I had two cesareans of questionable necessity followed by a homebirth.
The first Cesarean occurred as a direct consequence of AROM, which was done "to speed things up a bit." I was a naive first-time mom and trustingly went along with the idea. However that intervention caused my baby to become lodged sideways, and unable to descend. Diagnosis: CPD/FTP, C-Section.
My second birth, a VBAC attempt, was hampered greatly from emotional baggage left over from the first, however again hospital interventions also played a contributing role. I was given an epidural and Pitocin which required EFM, which limited my range of motion. Instead of being encouraged to move about to enhance the labor, I ended up laying on my side or my back (which compresses major blood vessels in the abdominal region). After a long labor fetal distress ensued, necessitating the second C-Section.
These two experiences so traumatized me that when I became pregnant a third time I sought counseling to face the fears I had built up from the past. I also became educated about the physiology of natural childbirth. I no longer FELT SAFE in a hospital environment. A woman MUST FEEL SAFE to labor effectively.
My third birth was intended as labor at home with homebirth midwives as doulas, then transport in time to deliver without interventions. Yet I was SO AFRAID to go to the hospital that I waited too long, and we ended up delivering at home.
Is that what you want? Women who feel so UNSAFE at the hospital that they refuse to go in? When will the medical profession realize that NON-INTERFERENCE is the best approach to birth??? Be ready to assist in a TRUE EMERGENCY, otherwise just let nature take its course, and provide well-trained labor support to guide and encourage things like squatting and so on. Until such a day I will encourage every low-risk first time mom I know to homebirth, and it is not out of the question for VBAC, either. I did it!
Respectfully Submitted,
Bonnie Anderson, Minnesota
Add Your Opinion On This Article
'States Respond To Increasing Demand For Midwives, Home Births'Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.
If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.
All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)
Contact Our News Editors
For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.
![]()
Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:
Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.




