MRI Better Than Current Standard of Practice In Assessing Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer Patients

Main Category: MRI / PET / Ultrasound
Article Date: 04 Mar 2005 - 0:00 PDT

Current ratings for:
'MRI Better Than Current Standard of Practice In Assessing Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer Patients'

Patient / Public:not yet rated

Healthcare Prof:not yet rated


More breast cancer patients with large palpable tumors are now undergoing chemotherapy before surgery in an effort to reduce the size of their tumor, and MRI is the best way to predict if the chemotherapy is working, preliminary results of a study show. If the chemotherapy is successful, then the woman may be able to undergo breast-conservation surgery rather than a mastectomy.

Currently, it is standard practice for the physician to do a breast examination to non-invasively assess whether the chemotherapy was effective, said Eren Yeh, MD, an instructor of radiology at Massachusetts General Hospital in Boston, and the lead author of the study. "Before we began the study, we weren't sure if breast tumors would enhance with the MR contrast agent gadolinium and therefore be visible after chemotherapy. Our study found that MRI is not perfect, but it's better than what's been used as the gold standard in the past," she said.

For the study, 31 patients prospectively underwent clinical examination, mammography, sonography and an MRI examination before, then following, chemotherapy. The results of these tests were then compared to the pathology results following surgery. MRI was right (when compared to pathology results) 71% of the time. It overestimated the amount of residual tumor in 6% and underestimated the amount of residual tumor in 23% of patients.

Sonography, on the other hand, was right only 35% of the time, overestimating the amount of tumor after chemotherapy in 13% and underestimating the amount of tumor in 52% of the cases. Clinical examination agreed with pathology in 19% of the cases, underestimating in 55% and overestimating the amount of disease in 26% of the cases; mammography was right in 26% of the cases, underestimating the amount of disease in 52% and overestimating in 23% of the cases.

In addition to being more accurate, MRI detected two additional lesions that were not seen on the other imaging methods, and these findings altered the way the patients were treated, said Dr. Yeh.

"In the future, we hope to use MRI earlier in the chemotherapy treatment to determine if the toxic therapy is reducing the tumor size. If it's not working, we can perhaps change the drug that's being used-in fact tailor treatment for each patient," she said.

The study appears in the March 2005 issue of the American Journal of Roentgenology.

AJR Mar 2005;184:868-877

Contact: Jason Ocker
jason@arrs.org
703-858-4304
American Roentgen Ray Society
http://www.arrs.org

Article adapted by Medical News Today from original press release.
Visit our mri / pet / ultrasound section for the latest news on this subject.
There are no references listed for this article.
Please use one of the following formats to cite this article in your essay, paper or report:

MLA
Joe Sutton. "MRI Better Than Current Standard of Practice In Assessing Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer Patients." Medical News Today. MediLexicon, Intl., 4 Mar. 2005. Web.
25 May. 2012. <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/20698.php>

APA
Joe Sutton. (2005, March 4). "MRI Better Than Current Standard of Practice In Assessing Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer Patients." Medical News Today. Retrieved from
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/20698.php.

Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.



Add Your Opinion On This Article

'MRI Better Than Current Standard of Practice In Assessing Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer Patients'

Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.

If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.

All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)

Your Name:*
E-mail Address:*
Your Opinion Title:*
Opinion:*
This is to help prevent SPAM submissions. Please enter the words exactly as they appear, including capital letters and punctuation.*

* Fields marked with a * need to be filled in before you hit the submit button.

Contact Our News Editors

For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.

Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:

Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.


MRI / PET / Ultrasound

What Is A PET Scan?

A PET scan uses radiation, or nuclear medicine imaging, to produce 3-dimensional, color images of the functional processes within the human body. PET stands for positron emission tomography. Read more...

What Is MRI?

MRI is short for Magnetic Resonance Imaging. It is a procedure used in hospitals to scan patients and determine the severity of certain injuries. Read more...

What Is An Ultrasound?

An ultrasound scan is a device that uses high frequency sound waves to create an image of some part of the inside of the body. Read more...

Most Popular Articles



Follow Our MRI News On Twitter

Follow Us On Twitter
Get the latest news for this category delivered straight to your Twitter account. Simply visit our MRI / PET / Ultrasound Twitter account and select the 'follow' option.



View list of all 'What Is...' articles »