Many children are undervaccinated or have delayed vaccinations in their first 2 years of life, USA
Main Category: Pediatrics / Children's HealthArticle Date: 09 Mar 2005 - 0:00 PDT
Approximately one-third of US children were undervaccinated for more than six months and one-fourth experienced delays in receiving many of the recommended vaccinations during their first 24 months of life, according to a study in the March 9 issue of JAMA.
Remaining appropriately vaccinated at all times decreases a child's risk of contracting vaccine-preventable diseases and prevents disease outbreaks, according to background information in the article. Yet a previous study found that only 18 percent of children in the U.S. received all vaccinations at the recommended ages or acceptably early (i.e., within minimum age allowances) and only 9 percent at the recommended ages.
Elizabeth T. Luman, Ph.D., of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, and colleagues examined the timeliness of receipt of vaccination among a nationally representative sample of children in the United States for each recommended vaccine and for all vaccines combined. The study consisted of the 2003 National Immunization Survey, conducted by random-digit dialing of households and mailing to vaccination providers to estimate vaccination coverage rates for U.S. children aged 19 to 35 months. Data for this study were limited to 14,810 children aged 24 to 35 months. The researchers wanted to determine the cumulative days children were undervaccinated during the first 24 months of life for each of 6 vaccines (diphtheria and tetanus toxoids and acellular pertussis; poliovirus; measles, mumps, and rubella; Haemophilus influenzae type b; hepatitis B; and varicella) and all vaccines combined, number of late vaccines, and risk factors for severe delay of vaccination.
The researchers found that children were undervaccinated an average of 172 days for all vaccines combined during their first 24 months of life. Approximately 34 percent were undervaccinated for less than 1 month and 29 percent for 1 to 6 months, while 37 percent were undervaccinated for more than 6 months. Vaccine-specific undervaccination of more than 6 months ranged from 9 percent for poliovirus vaccine to 21 percent for Haemophilus influenzae type b vaccine. An estimated 25 percent of children had delays in receipt of 4 or more of the 6 vaccines. Approximately 21 percent of children were severely delayed (undervaccinated for more than 6 months and for 4 or more vaccines).
Factors associated with severe delay included having a mother who was unmarried or who did not have a college degree, living in a household with 2 or more children, being non-Hispanic black, having 2 or more vaccination providers, and using public vaccination provider(s).
"Interventions must be focused on plans that could best address the needs of these mothers, such as extended office hours for women who have difficulty taking time away from work, using appropriate education-level information regarding safety and benefits of vaccination, and ensuring availability of sibling child care in the workplace," the researchers write.
"Assessing days undervaccinated reveals weaknesses in childhood vaccination programs. Physicians are in the best position to assess the needs of their patients to determine reasons for delay. Evidence-based solutions exist for many of these needs, such as reminder-recall systems, extended office hours, expanding availability of pediatric care, and education regarding the importance and safety of vaccinations. Minimizing the time spent incompletely protected from vaccine-preventable diseases is important to the health of individuals and to public health and should be given greater emphasis by public health programs and vaccination providers," the authors write.
"These results confirm that opportunity exists for improvement in vaccine administration in the United States to ensure that all children remain fully vaccinated and optimally protected from vaccine-preventable diseases throughout early childhood--the time when children are most at risk for illness and severe complications from many vaccine-preventable diseases," the researchers write.
(JAMA. 2005;293:1204-1211. Available post-embargo at http://www.jama.com)
Editor's Note: This research and the National Immunization Survey were conducted through funding by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
Contact: Curtis Allen
404-639-8487
JAMA and Archives Journals
http://www.jama.com
Visit our pediatrics / children's health section for the latest news on this subject.
MLA
16 Feb. 2012. <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/20929.php>
APA
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/20929.php.
Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.
|
Rate this article: (Hover over the stars then click to rate) |
Patient / Public: |
or |
Health Professional: |
Visitor Opinions In Chronological Order (2)
Dangerous immunization schedule
posted by Candace McCollett on 20 Mar 2005 at 10:04 pmI am very concerned on this issue. I do not wish for my family, or myself, to be fully immunized due to philosophical and moral reasons. Through my personal research on the subject, I find that the benefits do not outweigh the risks. I am not willing to put my family’s health in jeopardy through what I feel is an unsafe immunization schedule. Consequently, I have created my own immunization schedule for my children that cuts out some and reduces the frequency of others.
First of all, it shocks me to know that malpractice insurance does not cover vaccination procedures. Is it because of the chance that the recipient will have an adverse reaction to the sometimes dead, sometimes alive virus that is invading their system? Or is it the deadly and carcinogenic ingredients found in vaccinations? Here is a list:
Phenol—(carbolic acid) a deadly poison.
Formaldehyde—a known cancer-causing agent which is commonly used to embalm
corpses.
Thimerosal—(a mercury derivative) a toxic heavy metal that is not easily eliminated
from the body.
Alum—a preservative.
Aluminum phosphate—used in deodorants. Toxic.
Aluminum and oil adjuvants—cancer-producing in laboratory mice.
Acetone—a solvent used in fingernail polish remover. Very volatile.
Glycerin—a tri-atomic alcohol extracted from natural fats which are putrefied and decomposed. Some toxic effects of glycerin are kidney, liver and lung damage, diuresis, pronounced local tissue damage, gastrointestinal damage and death.
Furthermore, the CDC recommended vaccination schedule has most infants receiving 15 doses of these poisons by 6 months of age and up to 33 doses by the time they enter school. Specifically, mercury blocks the immune function of magnesium and zinc and interferes with production of some cytokines. There is also evidence that some forms of leukemia are abnormal responses to antigenic stimulation by mercury. You can be sure I am going to keep my kids away from a health hazard such as this.
Even as recently as the past 12 years, there have been recorded measles epidemics in high schools and colleges. Why these outbreaks if the MMR vaccination “works”? Mortality from such diseases has declined so dramatically over the past 100 years not just due to vaccinations, but also due to increased sanitation, antibacterial drugs and our body’s natural ability to build up immunity. For example, the bubonic plague (“black death”) never brought about a mass vaccination program, yet the disease is virtually unknown today. Naturally acquired immunity has worked in the past, there is no reason why it should not work now. Additionally, the Hepatitis B (HB) vaccine has been linked to autoimmune diseases such as Insulin Dependent Diabetes Mellitus, arthritis, Systemic Lupus Erythematosus, and Multiple Sclerosis (MS). Is it a coincidence that autoimmune diseases are more frequent in nations where vaccines are widely used? Dr. Burton A. Waisbren, a cell biologist and infectious disease specialist who also is a founding member of the Infectious Disease Society of America, has noticed an increasing number of reports in medical literature that point to demyelinizing diseases occurring after HB vaccination, as in MS. He warns that the genetically engineered HB vaccine contains polypeptide sequences that are present in human neurologic tissues. Also known as molecular mimicry, the HB vaccine “tricks” the immune system of genetically susceptible individuals into attacking their own body’s tissues. Another factor that may contribute to the autoimmune response to nervous tissue has to do with thimerosal that was mentioned earlier. This organic mercurial is similar to methyl- and ethylmercury and is likely to accumulate in lipid rich tissues, such as the CNS. The immune system recognizes this material as foreign and attacks it and the surrounding myelin sheath without bias.
We know that the government and the pharmaceutical companies give grants and other financial incentives to states to reward them for their vaccination efforts. It makes one wonder in which order priorities are laid since Merck’s 1997 vaccine sales reached one billion. More specifically, the FDA licensed the HB vaccine after monitoring their test subjects for only 5 days after injection, which says nothing for the long-term safety of the product. It can take months and sometimes years for chronic autoimmune diseases to develop and vaccine companies have not tracked the administration of their vaccines for that long before they marketed them. Therefore, the mass immunization project has made it a national experiment on our children. Needless to say, much more research is needed. Although doctors routinely give multiple vaccinations to children in one sitting, the Merck and Co. HB vaccine product insert states, “specific data are not yet available for the simultaneous administration of RECOMBIVAX HB with other vaccines.” Their product insert even admits that more research is needed: “the duration of the protective effect of RECOMBIVAX HB in healthy vaccines is unknown at present and the need for booster doses is not yet defined.”
Just as a patient would get a second opinion for an operation, it is important for parents to question any medical procedure that is to be done to their child. Immuniza-tions such as MMR, DTP, Hib, Polio and Hepatitis B are considered so routine we do not think to question these procedures. Every person has a different chemical make up and therefore will respond differently to foreign matter being injected into their body. Realistically, the medical community is playing Russian roulette by administering these shots to children. Some other reactions to immunizations have been paralytic polio, encephalitis and SIDS. Even though encephalitis is curable, paralytic polio and SIDS are irreversible.
In conclusion, I need to exercise my freedom of choice in matters concerning my health and uphold my moral obligations. Education and research is the key to ending this controversy.
Your Immunization Schedule
posted by Whitney on 29 May 2008 at 9:15 pmCan you please post the schedule that you and your family use? I and I'm sure others would find it very helpful.
Thanks!
Add Your Opinion
Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.
If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.
All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)
Contact Our News Editors
For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.
![]()
Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:
Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.





