Conservatives pledge £52 million to fight MRSA, UK
Main Category: MRSA / Drug ResistanceArticle Date: 11 Apr 2005 - 0:00 PDT
A £52 million plan to put matrons back in charge in Britain's NHS hospitals, armed with powers to spearhead a new crackdown on the MRSA "superbug", has been unveiled by Michael Howard.
Switching the election campaign spotlight onto health, the Party Leader announced that as part of a wider strategy to clean up dirty hospitals, an incoming Conservative administration will give priority to a special initiative to combat the crisis in hospital-acquired infections.
The clean-up drive will include providing extra funds to those hospitals which agree to adopt a ten point 'best practice' action plan which involves the named appointment of the Matron who will be responsible for infection prevention and control; establishing clear lines of accountability from senior nurses and midwives on wards to the Matron, to deliver cleanliness and infection prevention standards; and accepting a A Trust-wide dress code policy which will minimise cross-infection, maintain a professional appearance and enable staff to be easily identified.
If the Matron, or senior nurse, decides that the standard of cleaning is not good enough, a dirty ward would be cleaned again, until the appropriate standard is met. Otherwise Matrons will withhold payment.
Other details of the scheme include providing a designated uniform-changing area; promising to implement a model cleaning contract; ensuring that all wards have access to 24/7 cleaning; and seeing that senior nurses check every bed before a patient occupies it.
If the Matron, advised by the Infection Control Team after a risk assessment, decides to close a bed or ward, that decision could not overturned by any other manager.
After a campaign visit to St George's Hospital in Tooting, South London, Mr Howard returned to party HQ to launch his policy initiative, rip into Labour's failure to get a grip on the MRSA scandal, and warn that NHS patients "are dying because of Mr Blair's targets".
Calling for a change of direction, Mr Howard declared: "We'll put matron back where she belongs - in charge. This is central to my whole approach. It's called accountability. When something goes wrong someone, somewhere should take responsibility. Just as when something goes well they should get the credit - not the politicians. We'll also require hospitals to publish their infection levels so that patients know which hospitals are the cleanest. And we'll give them the right to choose to be treated in those hospitals."
The Conservative Party
Visit our mrsa / drug resistance section for the latest news on this subject.
MLA
15 Feb. 2012. <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/22633.php>
APA
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/22633.php.
Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.
|
Rate this article: (Hover over the stars then click to rate) |
Patient / Public: |
or |
Health Professional: |
Visitor Opinions In Chronological Order (2)
MRSA
posted by maria t sweeney on 19 Jul 2005 at 6:27 amYes, I am in favour of cleaning up your hospitals. I visited my father in the southern general hospital in Glasgow Scotland and could not beleive the filth, carpet on the walls in the corridors, baseboard hanging off the walls- definite germ harbor. It does not take a rocket scientist to see this. I visited my father to see blood under his nails, he had pulled his introvenous needle out-I had to tell the nurse to clean his nails, two hours later it was done, yes your hospitals are filthy, but your nursing staff are not on the ball either. my question to you is how do I deal with this when one of the causes of death stated on my dad's death certificate was MRSA, thank you national health for nothing, this was a man who went into hospital with a urinary infection, which the professor said " was the easiest to cure" his words, a man who could not wait to go and see his grandchildren, yes he was 89, but I can show you pictures on him doing things I could not do and I am 25 years younger, explain to me the sense in all of his, there is none other than down right negligence. Please answer me on this????? I would like a reply if you need more details I will gladly provide them, I have all the medical records.
Should skin prep before injections be resumed?
posted by Prof. F F Robb on 4 Aug 2005 at 9:13 pmI draw to your attention apaer by Pratt, Hoffman and Robb in British journal of Infection Control August 2005 Vol 6 No 4 pp 18 -20 discussing whether or not patients are being put at risk by the recent discontinuation of skin prep before injections etc.
Add Your Opinion
Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.
If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.
All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)
Contact Our News Editors
For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.
![]()
Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:
Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.



