Independent Analysis of Malpractice Debate Calls Clash Between Doctors and Lawyers a Red Herring, USA

Main Category: Litigation / Medical Malpractice
Article Date: 29 Apr 2005 - 12:00 PDT

Current ratings for:
'Independent Analysis of Malpractice Debate Calls Clash Between Doctors and Lawyers a Red Herring, USA'

Patient / Public:not yet rated

Healthcare Prof:not yet rated

Article opinions: 2 posts

Study Faults US Malpractice System for Skyrocketing Malpractice Costs -

Tired of the war mongering between doctors and lawyers groups accusing each other of being responsible for rapidly rising malpractice costs, the independent nonprofit group CodeBlueNow! today issued a Malpractice Fact Sheet that describes the current debate over medical malpractice and damage caps. According to CodeBlueNow!'s analysis, the real malpractice "crisis" is about fundamental flaws in the American malpractice system.

The CodeBlueNow! Malpractice Fact Sheet can be found online at codebluenow.org/pdf/malpractice-facts.

"The problem with the current debate is that neither the doctors nor the lawyers in the current debate speak for the citizen consumer," says Kathleen O'Connor, Founder and CEO of CodeBlueNow!. "When consumers become victims of unavoidable or avoidable medical error, they need to be compensated for medical expenses, wage loss and other direct damages in a fair, efficient and timely manner. It's our malpractice system and its reliance on fault that are responsible for increasing damage awards and costly defensive medicine on the part of physicians."

The American malpractice system relies on fault. It requires the injured victim and their attorney to allege fault and to accuse the medical provider of substandard medicine. The system requires the medical provider and their attorney to defend against these charges -- which, in turn, motivates the provider to conceal rather than document mistakes -- and to practice defensive medicine. Having providers conceal their errors is antithetical to quality improvement programs, which require the diligent identification of individual and system errors to establish proper corrective actions. The provider's practice of defensive medicine is not only costly; it exposes patients to medically unnecessary treatment.

Troyen Brennan, professor of Medicine, Law and Public Health at Harvard, and others who have studied the performance of the medical malpractice system with respect to these consumer objectives, have found the American malpractice system to be woefully inadequate. The majority of malpractice system dollars do not go to victims of medical error, but to plaintiff and defense attorneys, insurers, expert witnesses, and so forth. Brennan's studies also show that the vast majority of medical error victims do not file medical malpractice suits. Finally, the small minority that do sue and receive compensation are likely to be victims of actual medical error, although the system does sometimes reward individuals who are not in fact victims.

"There is no evidence that the American fault-based system motivates healthcare providers to practice better medicine. A no-fault based medical injury compensation system modeled after the American workers compensation system or New Zealand's governmental medical injury compensation program seems to require greater attention in the current debate. They are far more advantageous to citizen consumers who become medical injury victims. These individuals are not looking for someone to blame following suffering of medical injury, they are simply looking for appropriate compensation," O'Connor stresses.

The Malpractice Fact Sheet is the second in a series. The first was on the Medicare Prescription Drug Bill. Coming next is Medicaid. All Fact Sheets are available for downloading from the CodeBlueNow! website: codebluenow.com/news.html#factsheets

About CodeBlueNow!

CodeBlueNow! is a non-partisan, national 501(c)3 non-profit organization that is mobilizing grassroots efforts to transform the financing, delivery and management of the American health care system, by assuring that the public has a voice in shaping health care policy. The organization has grown from 30 people in October 2003 to having thousands of supporters in 46 states and an online radio show. More information is online at: http://www.codebluenow.org.

Article adapted by Medical News Today from original press release.
Visit our litigation / medical malpractice section for the latest news on this subject.
There are no references listed for this article.
Please use one of the following formats to cite this article in your essay, paper or report:

MLA
Trish Malden. "Independent Analysis of Malpractice Debate Calls Clash Between Doctors and Lawyers a Red Herring, USA." Medical News Today. MediLexicon, Intl., 29 Apr. 2005. Web.
26 May. 2012. <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/23594.php>

APA
Trish Malden. (2005, April 29). "Independent Analysis of Malpractice Debate Calls Clash Between Doctors and Lawyers a Red Herring, USA." Medical News Today. Retrieved from
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/23594.php.

Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.



Visitor Opinions (latest shown first)

Network of Health Care Courts

posted by Gregory D. Pawelski on 16 May 2005 at 8:55 pm

A new policy report from the Progressive Policy Institute and Common Good, is calling for a new network of specialized health courts (similar to those that judge workers' compensation claims) that would help replace America's broken justice system. The report says that today's medical justice system fails to compensate the vast majority of injured patients and does a poor job of preventing medical mistakes.

The current liability system does not give most injured patients access to justice. Only people with serious injuries and the potential for large awards are likely to find a lawyer to take their case because the legal costs involved are so high. Even for those with a serious injury, the malpractice system compensates only one in fourteen people.

At the same time, the system fails to promote patient safety. It does not send clear signals about standards of care that would help health care providers avoid medical mistakes, and it discourages frank discussion about failures and near misses.

A system of Health Courts would more frequently pay limited compensation awards for injuries that receive nothing today. It is a lot better than allowing tort cap awards for the few, while the majority of real problems are not even addressed.

A cap on non-economic damages would limit victims' access to justice by making it harder for lawyers to recoup the high costs of pursuing malpractice cases. Instead of caps on a broken legal system, Congress should fix it with Health Courts.

More information on the creation of special health courts as a way of restoring reliability to the medical justice system can be found at:
http://www.pipionline.org/documents/healthcourts_0217.pdf

| post followup | alert a moderator |


The real malpractice crisis is malpractice

posted by Jane Marshall on 30 Apr 2005 at 7:20 pm

According to CodeBlueNow!'s analysis, the real malpractice "crisis" is about fundamental flaws in the American malpractice system.

I beg to differ. The real malpractice crisis is malpractice. I can't recall anyone or any group who has addressed this issue who didn't put the metaphorical cart before the metaphorical horse.

Of course, addressing medical malpractice would mean holding not only bad doctors accountable for their affront to patients but also holding the medical profession responsible for policing its ranks.

Doctors hide behind their white wall of silence and patients too often suffer as a consequence.

Nationally, as many as 195,000 patients die annually because of medical negligence or error according to Colorado health care consultants HealthGrades Inc. That is twice the number reported in 1999 by the Institute of Medicine, using the same methodology.

That is an outrage.

| post followup | alert a moderator |


Add Your Opinion On This Article

'Independent Analysis of Malpractice Debate Calls Clash Between Doctors and Lawyers a Red Herring, USA'

Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.

If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.

All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)

Your Name:*
E-mail Address:*
Your Opinion Title:*
Opinion:*
This is to help prevent SPAM submissions. Please enter the words exactly as they appear, including capital letters and punctuation.*

* Fields marked with a * need to be filled in before you hit the submit button.

Contact Our News Editors

For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.

Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:

Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.


Litigation / Medical Malpractice

Most Popular Articles



Follow Our Litigation News On Twitter

Follow Us On Twitter
Get the latest news for this category delivered straight to your Twitter account. Simply visit our Litigation / Medical Malpractice Twitter account and select the 'follow' option.



View list of all 'What Is...' articles »