Despite Survival Benefit, Thousands Of Seniors Lack Access To Lifesaving Kidney Transplant
Main Category: Transplants / Organ DonationsAlso Included In: Urology / Nephrology; Seniors / Aging
Article Date: 15 Jan 2012 - 0:00 PST
Thousands more American senior citizens with kidney disease are good candidates for transplants and could get them if physicians would get past outdated medical biases and put them on transplant waiting lists, according to a new study by Johns Hopkins researchers.
The Hopkins investigators estimate that between 1999 and 2006, roughly 9,000 adults over 65 would have been "excellent" transplant candidates and approximately 40,000 more older adults would have been "good" candidates for new kidneys. None, however, were given the chance.
"Doctors routinely believe and tell older people they are not good candidates for kidney transplant, but many of them are if they are carefully selected and if factors that really predict outcomes are fully accounted for," says transplant surgeon Dorry L. Segev, M.D., Ph.D., an associate professor of surgery at the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine and leader of the study being published in the January issue of the Journal of the American Geriatric Society. "Many older adults can enjoy excellent transplant outcomes in this day and age," he says, and should "be given consideration for this lifesaving treatment."
Those ages 65 and older make up over one-half of people with end-stage renal disease in the United States, and appropriately selected patients in this age group will live longer if they get new kidneys as opposed to remaining on dialysis, Segev says. The trouble is, he adds, that very few older adults are even put on transplant waiting lists. In 2007, only 10.4 percent of dialysis patients between the ages of 65 and 74 were on waiting lists, compared to 33.5 percent of 18- to 44-year-old dialysis patients and 21.9 percent of 45- to 64-year-old dialysis patients.
Segev cautions that some older kidney disease patients are indeed poor transplant prospects, because they have other age-related health problems. But he says his team's new findings, in addition to other recent research, show that new organs can greatly improve survival even in this age group.
Segev and his team constructed a statistical model for predicting how well older adults would be expected to do after kidney transplantation by taking into account age, smoking, diabetes and 16 other health-related variables. Using those data to define an "excellent" candidate, the information was then applied to every person 65 and older on dialysis during the seven-year study period. The researchers also determined whether these candidates were already on the waiting list.
"We have this regressive attitude toward transplantation in older adults," Segev says, "one based on historical poor outcomes in older patients, which no longer hold up. Anyone who can benefit from kidney transplantation should at least be given a chance. They should at least be put on the list."
Segev says he knows there is a shortage of kidneys and some will question whether scarce organs would be put to better use in younger patients. But Segev's study predicts that more than 10 percent of older patients would get kidneys from living relatives or friends, which would have little impact on the nationwide shortage of deceased donor kidneys. But finding a living donor first requires referral for transplantation.
"By not referring older adults for transplant, we're not just denying them a chance at a kidney from a deceased donor, but we're potentially denying them a kidney from a live donor," he adds.
According to research by Segev and his team published last year in the Journal of the American Medical Association, live kidney donation is very safe for both donor and recipient, and more older adults are donating their kidneys to relatives. Other research done by Segev has shown that older kidney transplant recipients do well with kidneys from older donors, organs that are otherwise be rejected for use in younger patients.
Visit our transplants / organ donations section for the latest news on this subject.
The study was supported by grants from the National Institutes of Health and the American Federation for Aging Research.
Other Hopkins researchers involve in the research include Morgan E. Grams, M.D., M.H.S.; Lauren M. Kucirka, M.H.S.; Colleen Hanrahan, M.S.; Robert A. Montgomery, M.D., D.Phil.; and Alan B. Massie, M.H.S.
Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions
MLA
23 Feb. 2012. <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/240287.php>
APA
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/240287.php.
Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.
|
Rate this article: (Hover over the stars then click to rate) |
Patient / Public: |
or |
Health Professional: |
Visitor Opinions In Chronological Order (2)
Kidney Transplants are NOT life-saving
posted by Living Donor 101 on 15 Jan 2012 at 8:26 amLife-saving? Dr. Segev knows better. A transplant isn't a cure for kidney disease, but a treatment, just like dialysis. In addition, there is plenty of evidence to suggest that at home dialysis is just as effective as a transplant. Of course, Segev and his surgeon cohorts don't profit from dialysis.
Considering OPTN's recent admission that transplant centers often discard viable donor kidneys from deceased donors over the age of 50, and many others have had an adverse reaction to the suggestion that recipients and donor kidneys be age-matched (Oh, the horror that a 70 year old wouldn't receive a 40 year old kidney!), what solution does Dr. Segev suggest?
Making more people eligible for an already scarce resource hardly seems wise. Is Dr. Segev active in increased organ donors? Or does he prefer to solicit more members of the public to be living donors despite a complete absence of national standards, quality controls, and data? Creating a new class of patients with reduced renal function doesn't seem to be the most efficient or ethical means of treating kidney disease in the elderly. But then again, it assures the transplant industry a future revenue stream.
YES, Kidney Transplants ARE Life Saving!
posted by george franklin on 17 Jan 2012 at 5:51 amSpeaking from MY experience, YES, getting a kidney transplant HAS saved my life. There are few doctors that would agree that a person starting hemo dialysis in 1972 at the age of 18 would still be alive, on hemo dialysis at the age of 57. I look at Organ Transplantation as any business that grows due to advances in technology etc. Are people making money due to transplantation?? Of course. Are people making money due to advances in the technology of dialysis?? BIG of course! Are people making money because of the advances in headache pills...of course. Things are NOT as they were in 1972, certainly not as they were in 1952! Or 1982. Would I be alive, 'existing' on dialysis for over 39 years??? It's VERY unlikely. Ask ANY Doctor about that. As a 'kid', I had NINE surgeries during the 3 years I was on hemo dialysis...I've had one minor and three major surgeries since the transplant in 1975, with the first major surgery in 1995, 20 years after the transplant. And none of those surgeries related to the transplant.
SO...Has Organ Donation saved MY life...Y E S. Ask my grand son if it saved my life. Google my name, if you like. You can see the history of a life SAVED by a still Unknown Deceased Donor from the great state of Tennessee saying YES in 1975, to save the life of a then 21 year old sick kid in DC on hemo dialysis.
Add Your Opinion
Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.
If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.
All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)
Contact Our News Editors
For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.
![]()
Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:
Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.




