London's Underground is still polluted, but the dust does not pose a serious risk to health

Main Category: Public Health
Article Date: 17 May 2005 - 0:00 PDT

Current ratings for:
London's Underground is still polluted, but the dust does not pose a serious risk to health

Patient / Public:4 and a half stars

4.5 (2 votes)

Healthcare Prof:not yet rated


Commuters and workers on the London's Tube network, gearing up for another potentially suffocating summer below ground, can at least take some comfort from research in Occupational and Environmental Medicine.

The study shows that although polluted and extremely dusty, London's underground transport system has much lower levels of more hazardous ultrafine particles than are found in the air near the capital's roads.

Instead, the system harbours larger and heavier particles that are made of iron, rather than carbon, while harmful minerals are well below levels permissible in the workplace.

The research team analysed the amount and size of dust particles at several different station platforms and in drivers' cabs on the London Underground. They calculated the likely levels of exposure to particulate matter by staff and passengers, and tested it for levels of toxicity.

They found that compared with outdoor air the dust levels were high in terms of mass, but low in terms of particle number, and were somewhat lower in drivers' cabs than on station platforms.

Two thirds (67%) of the dust comprised iron oxide, with a further 1 to 2% quartz, plus traces of other minerals, such as chromium, copper, zinc and manganese, which were too low to pose a health risk.

The researchers judged that, weight for weight, the risks from Underground dust are much more comparable to iron oxide welding fume than to particles in outdoor air. But the exposure is much lower than would be required to cause lung disease.

The safe occupational welding fume exposure level is set at 5000 ug/m3 and workers on the London Underground could expect to be exposed to maximum levels of 200 ug/m3 over an 8 hour shift.

Commuters using the Underground for two hours every day would boost their particulate matter levels by 17 ug/m3 over 24 hours, but this would comprise iron oxide rather than ultrafine particles.

The authors conclude that the risks of serious heart or lung disease are very low for those working or travelling on the London Underground, and that choice of travel should be based on cost and convenience, not on the risks to health from inhaling particles.. But they say that efforts to eliminate the dust should continue, "since the dust is not without toxicity."

[The London Underground: dust and hazards to health Occup and Environ Med 2005; 62: 355-62]
[The London Underground: time for a thorough clean-up? Occup and Environ Med 2005; 62: 334] (Editorial)

Click here to view the paper(s) in full:

Paper:
press.psprings.co.uk/oem/june/355_om14332.pdf

Editorial:
http://press.psprings.co.uk/oem/june/354_om18929.pdf

Article adapted by Medical News Today from original press release.
Visit our public health section for the latest news on this subject.
There are no references listed for this article.
Please use one of the following formats to cite this article in your essay, paper or report:

MLA
Pickwick, Anne. "London's Underground is still polluted, but the dust does not pose a serious risk to health." Medical News Today. MediLexicon, Intl., 17 May. 2005. Web.
18 May. 2013. <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/24485.php>

APA
Pickwick, A. (2005, May 17). "London's Underground is still polluted, but the dust does not pose a serious risk to health." Medical News Today. Retrieved from
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/24485.php.

Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.



Add Your Opinion On This Article

'London's Underground is still polluted, but the dust does not pose a serious risk to health'

Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.

If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.

All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)

Your Name:*
E-mail Address:*
Your Opinion Title:*
Opinion:*
This is to help prevent SPAM submissions. Please enter the words exactly as they appear, including capital letters and punctuation.*

* Fields marked with a * need to be filled in before you hit the submit button.

Contact Our News Editors

For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.

Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:

Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.


Public Health

Do You Know What Drowning Looks Like?

If you and your family are planning to spend some of the summer by the sea, by the pool, or perhaps even a river or lake, perhaps you should ask yourself: do you really know what drowning looks like? Read more...

Tips For Healthy Flying

There was a time when jumping on a plane was a relatively easy thing to do (assuming you had the money). But today's flying experience is often more of an ordeal than a pleasure. Read more...

Most Popular Articles



Follow Our Public Health News On Twitter

Follow Us On Twitter
Get the latest news for this category delivered straight to your Twitter account. Simply visit our Public Health Twitter account and select the 'follow' option.



View list of all 'What Is...' articles »