Psychologists find neurological mechanism for subliminal learning, Boston University
Main Category: Psychology / PsychiatryArticle Date: 27 May 2005 - 0:00 PDT
| Patient / Public: | ![]() |
4.05 (22 votes) |
| Healthcare Prof: | ![]() |
4.83 (6 votes) |
| Article Opinions: | 1 posts |
Watch out -- you may learn something and not even know it, says Takeo Watanabe, an associate professor of psychology at Boston University's Center for Brain and Memory. Watanabe and his team recently pinpointed the mechanism that makes subliminal learning work. Watanabe will present the team's findings at the American Psychological Society meeting in Los Angeles, May 27 and 28.
Long considered the realm of science fiction, subliminal learning occurs when individuals are influenced by a stimulus they are unaware of, like words played back below the threshold of hearing or images flashed on screen faster than the eye can perceive. Watanabe's recent findings grew out of his team's previous work in which they established that subliminal learning is real and that the brain is capable of learning without consciously focused attention.
In this latest research, Watanabe and his team uncovered the mechanism that primes the subconscious, enabling individuals to learn a task without actually realizing it. They also showed this type of learning is retained, giving a new interpretation to how long a learned behavior is retained in the visual cortex -- an area of the brain thought to be fixed very early in life.
To establish how the mechanism worked, Watanabe's team devised a series of perception tests. Initially, participants watched a computer screen as a series of letters flashed by and were instructed to signal when they saw a gray letter. As individuals concentrated on watching for gray letters, sets of dots jiggled on the screen in areas that were at the periphery of the visual field. Five to 10 percent of the dots moved together in a coherent direction -- a fraction smaller than that easily detectible by the human eye. Letters flashing on the screen were randomly paired with the moving dots.
From this test, the researchers established the length of time it took each participant to identify the direction and coherent movement of the dots on the screen.
Participants were next exposed to a similar set of computer screens, this time with the fraction of the moving dots faded to just below the level of human perception. As participants watched for gray letters to appear in the center of the screen, the imperceptible dots moved coherently just outside their field of vision. Participants were exposed again and again to the imperceptible, moving dots as they signaled the gray letters and were later tested to see if their recognition time had improved.
In a subsequent round of tests, participants showed marked improvement in the time they took to recognize the coherently moving dots. Watanabe says this improvement demonstrates the participants learned to recognize and better identify the movement during the trials, even though their attention was focused somewhere else and the moving dots were faded to the point of being imperceptible.
The experiment differed from previous studies in having participants focus on something other than the moving dots -- in this case, the letters on the screen -- while being exposed to the movement of the imperceptible dots. Watanabe says that having subjects focus on letters activated an internal "reward" pathway in their brains, priming their subconscious to learn more efficiently.
According to Watanabe, the visual cortex, the area of the brain tested in his experiments, has long been considered unchangeable in humans past 6 months of age. Watanabe found it could be "changed" and that the changes could last for a considerable period; individuals were tested again six months after the initial trials and show little or no deterioration in their ability to recognize moving dots in a visually noisy background.
"It's possible that other parts of the brain could work this way too," Watanabe says. "People might be able to improve their pronunciation of a new language, if it's presented simply, without paying attention. It's possible the brain could be changed without a lot of effort."
The Watanabe group plans to repeat their experiments using functional magnetic resonance imaging, or fMRI, to peer into the brains of participants. Using fMRI, the team will essentially be able to look directly into the portion of the brain involved in subliminal learning.
The Department of Psychology at Boston University, part of the College and Graduate School of Arts and Sciences, offers programs of research in brain, behavior, and cognition; clinical psychology; or human development.
Boston University, the fourth-largest independent university in the nation, has an enrollment of more than 29,000 in its 17 schools and colleges.
Contact: Ann Marie Menting/Brad Plummer
amenting@bu.edu
617-358-1240
Boston University
http://www.bu.edu
Visit our psychology / psychiatry section for the latest news on this subject.
MLA
14 Feb. 2012. <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/25190.php>
APA
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/25190.php.
Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.
|
Rate this article: (Hover over the stars then click to rate) |
Patient / Public: |
or |
Health Professional: |
Visitor Opinions In Chronological Order (1)
Subliminal Learning
posted by Michele Robles on 28 Oct 2010 at 10:49 amHello, just read your article on subliminal learning, May 2005. Just to let you know I so much agree with it. I am an artist and have been using spray paint as my medium since around 1980,(not to be confused with grafitti art) For the longest I thought I was the only one doing this sort of thing until I heard about other people who also did something similar. In short, my point is that even though really in my heart I felt I had not copied anyone else---nevertheless I can't help but think that somewhere, somehow I picked up that idea and applied it with perfect timing when one day I had this urge to paint and did not have the needed supplies. Also, So many times I have read where artists express that no one influenced them, insinuating that they are original. In my opinion, no one is original. Michele Robles (Michelou)
Add Your Opinion
Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.
If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.
All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)
Contact Our News Editors
For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.
![]()
Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:
Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.





