Computerized Physician Order Entry System Does Not Reduce Medical Errors in Utah VA Hospital, Study Finds

Main Category: Litigation / Medical Malpractice
Article Date: 27 May 2005 - 10:00 PDT

email icon email to a friend   printer icon printer friendly   write icon opinions  

Current Article Ratings:

Patient / Public:not yet rated

Healthcare Prof:not yet rated


A high rate of medical errors in prescription drug ordering, dosage and monitoring can persist at hospitals that use computerized order entry systems, according to a study published this week in the... Archives of Internal Medicine, the Salt Lake Tribune reports. In the study, conducted at the Veterans Administration Healthcare System in Salt Lake City, lead researcher Jonathan Nebecker and colleagues analyzed electronic records of 937 patients admitted to the hospital over a 20-week period in 2000. Ninety percent of patients at VA hospitals are males who tend to be older and sicker and have lower incomes than patients at other facilities. According to the study, 27% of adverse events related to prescription drugs were caused by medical errors. Of those, 61% occurred in ordering prescriptions, 25% during monitoring, 13% in administering drugs and 1% in dispensing medications. Researchers found no errors related to the transcription of prescriptions. Overall, researchers found 483 significant adverse drug events. At least one adverse event occurred in 25% of hospitalizations, including six deaths. Researchers believe the actual rate of adverse drug effects at the hospital was similar to that of other hospitals, but the numbers appear higher than in other studies because of the clarity of the computerized system. "It's not that there were more events, the measurements are better. We found that three-quarters of adverse drug effects were recognized by the computerized system," Nebecker said. He added, "People on the one hand expect computers to solve all problems. They eliminated transcription problems, but the program was not designed to detect problems with drug choice and dosing." Researchers said more sophisticated technology that can offer advice on drug choice, dosage levels and monitoring is needed at hospitals (Hamilton, Salt Lake Tribune, 5/25).

Online An abstract of the study is available online.

"Reprinted with permission from kaisernetwork.org kaisernetwork.org. You can view the entire Kaiser Daily Health Policy Report, search the archives, or sign up for email delivery at http://www.kaisernetwork.org/dailyreports/healthpolicy. The Kaiser Daily Health Policy Report is published for kaisernetwork.org, a free service of The Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation . © 2005 Advisory Board Company and Kaiser Family Foundation. All rights reserved.

Article adapted by Medical News Today from original press release.
Visit our litigation / medical malpractice section for the latest news on this subject.
There are no references listed for this article.
Please use one of the following formats to cite this article in your essay, paper or report:

MLA
Mary Sweeney. "Computerized Physician Order Entry System Does Not Reduce Medical Errors in Utah VA Hospital, Study Finds." Medical News Today. MediLexicon, Intl., 27 May. 2005. Web.
15 Feb. 2012. <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/25222.php>

APA
Mary Sweeney. (2005, May 27). "Computerized Physician Order Entry System Does Not Reduce Medical Errors in Utah VA Hospital, Study Finds." Medical News Today. Retrieved from
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/25222.php.

Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.


Litigation / Medical Malpractice

Most Popular Articles



Follow Our Litigation News On Twitter

Follow Us On Twitter
Get the latest news for this category delivered straight to your Twitter account. Simply visit our Litigation / Medical Malpractice Twitter account and select the 'follow' option.



View list of all 'What Is...' articles »