Bathing Abdomen In Chemotherapy Gives Ovarian Cancer Patients Better Chance Of Survival
Main Category: Ovarian CancerAlso Included In: Radiology / Nuclear Medicine
Article Date: 09 Mar 2013 - 9:00 PST
Bathing Abdomen In Chemotherapy Gives Ovarian Cancer Patients Better Chance Of Survival
| Patient / Public: | ![]() |
3 (1 votes) |
| Healthcare Prof: | ![]() |
3 (1 votes) |
| Article opinions: | 1 posts |
More Women Should Receive Intraperitoneal Treatment, Suggests 10-Year Follow-up
Patients with advanced ovarian cancer who undergo intensive treatment with chemotherapy that bathes the abdomen are significantly more likely to live longer than those who receive standard intravenous (IV) chemotherapy, according to a study that analyzed long-term follow-up from two landmark Gynecologic Oncology Group (GOG) trials comprising 876 patients. Results of the study are being presented at the Society of Gynecologic Oncology (SGO) Annual Meeting on Women's Cancer in Los Angeles, March 9-12.
Women who receive the treatment in the form of intraperitoneal, or IP chemotherapy are 17 percent more likely to survive longer than those who have IV chemotherapy, according to the analysis, which had a median follow-up of more than 10 years. Median survival was more than five years (62 months) for patients in the IP group and about four years (51 months) for patients in the IV group. Median is defined as the number separating the upper and lower half of a study population.
The findings also suggest women who complete most or all of the recommended six cycles of IP therapy are likely to live longer than women who complete four or fewer cycles. After five years, 59 percent of patients who completed five or six cycles of IP therapy were alive, compared to 33 percent of those who completed three or four cycles and 18 percent of those who completed one or two cycles. Patients who are unable to receive the full six cycles of IP therapy typically transition to IV chemotherapy for the remaining cycles.
"Too many women do not receive an explanation about the advantages and disadvantages of IP therapy and that it could be a potential life saver," said Devansu Tewari, MD, Director of Gynecologic Oncology for the Southern California Permanente Medical Group in Orange County, Calif., of Kaiser Permanente and Assistant Professor of Obstetrics and Gynecology at the University of California, Irvine School of Medicine. "But there is also a caution that it should be administered by a physician who has expertise in the treatment and can best manage the risks and side effects."
Every year, more than 22,000 women are diagnosed with ovarian cancer and more than 15,000 die of the disease. In standard IV chemotherapy, the drugs are infused into the bloodstream and throughout the body, whereas IP treatment directs the chemotherapy to the abdomen. This not only places a high concentration of cancer-killing drugs where they are needed, but the chemotherapy agents are absorbed more slowly, providing more exposure to the medicine. IP is recommended by the National Cancer Institute for women who have had optimal surgery.
Because IP therapy is more rigorous, some of the side effects are also more intense, such as numbness in the hands and feet and abdominal pain, and some women are unable to complete the suggested six cycles of therapy. Researchers found younger, healthier patients were more likely to complete more cycles of IP.
Funded by the National Cancer Institute, the Gynecologic Oncology Group comprises experts in the field, from gynecologic oncologists to nurses to scientists, who are committed to maintaining the highest standards in clinical trials. The GOG focuses its research on women with pelvic malignancies, such as cancer of the ovary, uterus and cervix.
"There is no question IP therapy should be much more widely offered, and advanced ovarian cancer patients should consult with gynecologic oncologists or medical oncologists with experience in this cancer who have the expertise to determine the best therapy," said Dr. Tewari. "At the very least, these women should be treated by someone who has experience with IP therapy issues and knowledge of whether she would be a good candidate."
Visit our ovarian cancer section for the latest news on this subject.
MLA
23 May. 2013. <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/257355.php>
APA
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/257355.php.
Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.
Visitor Opinions (latest shown first)
Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy Improves Survival In Ovarian Cancer?
posted by Greg on 14 Mar 2013 at 9:11 amIn 2006, Dr. Deborah Armstrong's study was published on this protocol and many doctors thought the results would change the field forever. It compared standard intravenous chemotherapy with intraperitoneal chemotherapy. The test regimen was highly toxic, and not all patients could tolerate it, with only 42% of women being able to finish the rather arduous trial. But Armstrong had the most definitive results.
Why hasn't IP therapy caught on? Dr. Armstrong told New York Times that part of the reason may involve money. With IP chemotherapy, patients also need a lot of intravenous fluids, which means unusually long treatment sessions. Oncologists are paid for treatments, not for time, so for those in private practice, long sessions can eat away at income. “You don’t make a lot of money with somebody in the chair getting IV fluids,” Dr. Armstrong said. “Chair time is money."
The issue about "chair time" is similar to the way a restaurant owner doesn't want customers to linger for a long time over a meal, but instead wants them to eat, drink, pay their bill and free up the table for the next customer. Some chemotherapy treatments require the patient to remain in the oncologist's chemotherapy chair for many hours. Other treatments are in and out in a matter of minutes. NCI-designated cancer centers want to free up chairs for their clinical trial students.
Intraperitoneal chemotherapy improving the chances of survival in ovarian cancer could be an indication of the "Right Therapy" but the "Wrong Drugs."
The hallmark of cancer is heterogeneity. Not just many types of cancer, but many subtypes of cancer within a given type. The biologies are very different and the response to given drugs is very different.
The hallmark of cancer treatment is heterogeneity. There are hundreds of FDA approved cancer drugs. All of these drugs tend to be partially effective, and even then, in only a minority of cases, and often for only a short duration of time.
The single most neglected area of cancer research has been the development of methods and technologies to be "matchmakers" between individual cancer with individual cancer treatment.
The single most neglected area of cancer treatment has been the unwillingness to utilize the matchmaker technologies which have already been developed and available. These technologies involve studies of cancer cell responses to drug exposure in cell culture systems "outside" of the patient's body, before they are put "into" the patient's body.
Add Your Opinion On This Article
'Bathing Abdomen In Chemotherapy Gives Ovarian Cancer Patients Better Chance Of Survival'Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.
If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.
All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)
Contact Our News Editors
For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.
![]()
Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:
Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.


