Fertility Drugs Might Not Help Women Lacking Estrogen Gene, Study Says
Main Category: FertilityArticle Date: 24 Jul 2005 - 7:00 PDT
| Patient / Public: | ![]() |
|
| Healthcare Prof: | ![]() |
1 (1 votes) |
Fertility drugs might not increase a woman's chance of conception if she lacks the gene known as estrogen receptor beta, according to a study published in the August issue of the journal... Endocrinology, Reuters reports. John Couse of the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences and colleagues genetically engineered female mice without the estrogen receptor protein and then compared their fertility to that of other female mice. The researchers found those that were genetically altered were more likely to be infertile or have fewer offspring than the other mice. In addition, the mice without estrogen receptor beta failed to produce additional eggs after receiving fertility drugs (Reuters, 7/20). If researchers determine that the findings are applicable to women as well, a blood test could be developed to detect the presence or absence of the gene, allowing doctors to diagnose infertility more effectively and narrow down possible treatments, according to an NIH release. "If we can help couples understand the reasons for their infertility, doctors can further define their treatment options, help them to minimize the expense and risk of taking drugs that may be less effective for them, and increase their chances of having a safe and healthy child," NIEHS Director David Schwartz said (NIH release, 7/20).
"Reprinted with permission from http://www.kaisernetwork.org. You can view the entire Kaiser Daily Health Policy Report, search the archives, or sign up for email delivery at http://www.kaisernetwork.org/dailyreports/healthpolicy. The Kaiser Daily Health Policy Report is published for kaisernetwork.org, a free service of The Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation . © 2005 Advisory Board Company and Kaiser Family Foundation. All rights reserved.
Visit our fertility section for the latest news on this subject.
MLA
15 Feb. 2012. <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/27912.php>
APA
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/27912.php.
Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.
|
Rate this article: (Hover over the stars then click to rate) |
Patient / Public: |
or |
Health Professional: |
Add Your Opinion
Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.
If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.
All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)
Contact Our News Editors
For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.
![]()
Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:
Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.




