Mental Health Foundation calls service-user defined outcomes symposium, on publication of final star ratings, UK
Main Category: Mental HealthArticle Date: 27 Jul 2005 - 23:00 PDT
In response to the Healthcare Commission's publication of the final set of star ratings today, the Foundation has called a symposium on mental health service user-defined performance measures. The event in November will provide a think-tank opportunity to examine meaningful measures and how to embed them in the future of health service inspections.
The charity welcomed the Healthcare Commission's statement today that the challenge for mental health trusts remains 'to measure what really matters to patients and staff in the most meaningful way'. Today's star ratings indicate some broad improvements in mental health, but less than a quarter of mental health trusts achieved three stars. The Foundation has always maintained that the ratings system is not an effective way of measuring the performance of mental health trusts.
Through the symposium, the Foundation aims to bring together key stakeholders in the mental health service user movement, charities, patient and public involvement forums, NHS and other statutory organisations, including the Healthcare Commission. It will provide a structured day of discussion, agreed actions and future plans for ensuring that inspections of mental health services take account of genuine user-defined outcomes.
The Mental Health Foundation is not a direct service provider, and receives just under 85% of its income from voluntary sources. It recently appointed David Crepaz-Keay as a Senior Policy Advisor on Patient and Public Involvement. The new post will see David promote the voices of service users throughout the Foundation's policy, service and practice development work.
David Crepaz-Keay said: "It's time that targets were set by the people most affected by services' successes and failures. Service user involvement remains meaningless while targets are defined by professionals and service managers. We welcome the challenge the Healthcare Commission has set for the mental health sector and all those who have a stake in measuring the performance of mental health trusts. We will seize the opportunity with both hands."
The event will be held at a central London venue, date to be confirmed. Expressions of interest in the symposium should be addressed in the first instance to gmcewan@mhf.org.uk
The Mental Health Foundation uses research and practical projects to help people survive, recover from and prevent mental health problems. We work to influence policy, including government at the highest levels. And we use our knowledge to raise awareness and to help tackle the stigma attached to mental illness. We reach millions of people every year through our media work, information booklets and online services.
http://www.mhf.org.uk
Visit our mental health section for the latest news on this subject.
MLA
14 Feb. 2012. <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/28163.php>
APA
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/28163.php.
Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.
|
Rate this article: (Hover over the stars then click to rate) |
Patient / Public: |
or |
Health Professional: |
Visitor Opinions In Chronological Order (1)
savior
posted by Harold A. Maio on 28 Jul 2005 at 12:07 amhttp://www.medicalnewstoday.com/medicalnews.php?newsid=28163
"...we use our knowledge to raise awareness and to help tackle the stigma attached to mental illness. "
Mental Health Foundation:
What a peculiar statement, addressing a negative instead of asserting a positive! Sort of the Pandora's Box Syndrome, let the negative out, and then try to put it back inside! It cannot be done. If you are employing negatives, you are teaching them. Stop.
Advocacy is the positive representation of an issue, prejudice, is the negative. One named prejudice is "stigma." It is among the most powerful, because eventually it is self-imposed. Its main strength lies in achieving complicity. It dies without.
The "stigma" of rape is asserted by no woman's advocacy. The "stigma" of mental illnesses is asserted by almost all mental health advocacies. I wonder why the difference? Women learned its purpose and stopped feeding it.
You could as well.
Harold A. Maio, MA
8955 Forest St
Ft Myers FL 33907
khmaio@earthlink.net
239-275-5798 Advocate, and
Former Consulting Editor
Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal
I watched an interesting TV show last night (Law and Order), about a man and his total control over a cult. The playwright wrote words to this effect:
If you can convince a group of people they are oppressed, and offer yourself as their savior, you can control them.
Asserting a group faces "stigma" and offering to "help" them, qualifies as example.
Harold
Add Your Opinion
Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.
If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.
All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)
Contact Our News Editors
For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.
![]()
Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:
Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.



