Chemotherapy, radiation better for patients with locally advanced lung cancer, researchers find
Main Category: Lung CancerArticle Date: 02 Sep 2005 - 14:00 PDT
While researchers have learned in the last decade that combining chemotherapy with radiation is better than radiation alone for treating non-small cell lung cancer patients with locally advanced disease - cancer confined to the lungs - finding the right combination of drugs - and the best timing of treatment - has been tricky.
A new study led by lung cancer specialists at Jefferson Medical College adds to growing evidence that giving patients both chemotherapy and radiation in the beginning of treatment may help patients live longer. Non-small-cell lung cancer accounts for about 80 percent of all cases of lung cancer. An estimated 40,000 Americans are diagnosed each year with locally advanced disease.
"This is a further step in looking at what is the best combination of two chemotherapy agents with radiation, which will enable us to move forward and study it more systematically," says Walter J. Curran Jr., M.D., professor and chair of radiation oncology at Jefferson Medical College at Thomas Jefferson University in Philadelphia and clinical director of Jefferson's Kimmel Cancer Center, who led the research.
"There are new biologic agents we want to test with chemotherapy, with radiation and with both," he notes. "Finding the best combination of chemotherapy and radiation provides a template by which we can test these agents."
The results appear September 1, 2005 in the Journal of Clinical Oncology.
In the multicenter, randomized phase 2 trial, researchers compared three different approaches to treating inoperable non-small-cell lung cancer that had not spread beyond the lungs. They divided more than 250 patients into three treatment arms. One group received chemotherapy before radiation. A second group had chemotherapy before and during radiation. Patients in the third arm received chemotherapy and radiation at the same time, then added a little more chemotherapy after. Each arm had the same schedule of radiation and were given the same two standard chemotherapy agents, carboplatin and paclitaxel.
Dr. Curran and his colleagues found that the patients in the third arm did best, living several months more on average when compared against the standard treatment.
"That's in keeping with the observed results of other studies," Dr. Curran says. "Giving radiation and chemotherapy from day one appears to be the best approach for these patients," though side effects can at first appear to be worse.
"Researchers are already looking at targeted agents such as bevacizumab, cetuximab and other agents with chemotherapy and radiation in lung cancer," he says. "This kind of study will help guide us as to which schedule to use."
Some other institutions that participated in the trial include medical centers at the University of Pittsburgh and Vanderbilt University and Rush University Medical Center.
Steve Benowitz or Phyllis Fisher
steven.benowitz@jefferson.edu
Thomas Jefferson University
http://www.jefferson.edu
Visit our lung cancer section for the latest news on this subject.
MLA
15 Feb. 2012. <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/30047.php>
APA
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/30047.php.
Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.
|
Rate this article: (Hover over the stars then click to rate) |
Patient / Public: |
or |
Health Professional: |
Visitor Opinions In Chronological Order (1)
Individualized Testing
posted by Gregory D. Pawelski on 4 Sep 2005 at 5:46 amSurgery is generally used if it can cure the cancer. It is most useful in cancers that have not spread. Even if the cancer has spread to only one area or is small, then it may be possible to remove it completely with surgery. It is likely that surgical skill is a more important determinant of prognosis than the aggressive nature of the cancer or its stage at diagnosis. Some surgeons view chemotherapy as a remedy for "bad" surgery. Chemotherapy just isn't good enough to make up for surgical mistakes (e.g. failure to get good margins, tumor spills during surgery, etc.). The most important prognostic factor is the surgeon.
An article in the May 2005 issue of Oncology News International (Vol. 14, No.5) reports that neoadjuvant taxol chemotherapy causes the release of cancer cells into the blood. Katharina Pachmann, M.D., the lead author of a study reported that paclitaxel (taxol) produces the greatest degree of tumor shrinkage but also the greatest release of circulating tumor cells. This observation corresponds with results found in patients that tumor response does not mean increased survival. (Oncol News Int'l, Vol 14, #5, May '05)
This study applies to another by Christos Kosmas, M.D., entitled, "Carcinomatous Meningitis: Taxane-Induced," which found what is called "dissemination after taxane-based (taxol) chemotherapy." The study's conclusions are that Carcinomatous Meningitis (a metastasis) after a major response to front-line taxane-based regimens represents a grave manifestation and its incidence appears increased when compared retrospectively to non-taxane-treated patients. (American Journal Clinical Oncology 2002;63:6-15)
Taxol appears to increase the risk of lung inflammation and researchers suggest using it with caution. It is sometimes used along with radiation treatments since it is thought the drug might enhance the radiation's effects. However, the combination may cause more problems than it solves, like radiation pneumonitis. Radiation pneumonitis is a lung inflammation that occurs from radiation. it may develop about eight weeks after completing a course of radiation. Taxol increases the chance of having this problem. (Journal Nat'l Canc Inst.,Dec.'01)
Increasingly, targeted oral-dose anti-cancer drugs (like Iressa and Tarceva) are found to treat cancers effectively in those that it is helping, and seen as an intergral and necessary part of a patient's cancer care. There are many cancer drug regimens, all of which have approximately the same probability of working. The tumors of different patients have different responses to chemotherapy. Tumors grow and spread in different ways and their response to treatment depends on these unique characteristics. The amount of chemotherapy that each patient can tolerate varies considerably from patient to patient. It requires individualized treatment based on testing the individual properties of each patient's cancer.
Assay-directed chemotherapy is an individualized approach to killing cancer. Chemotherapy Sensitivity and Resistance Assays are a method used to determine what precise medications would kill the particular cancer. Doctors have assumed that stopping cell division would stop cancer, because most cancer cells divide and grow rapidly. But the approach didn't always kill the malignant cells. Cancer isn't a case of cells growing out of control, but of cells refusing to die on schedule.
More and more physicians and patients are turning to individualized therapies to treat cancers. Under this approach, scientists study how an individual's cancerous cells respond to several drugs. Doctors have learned that even when the disease is the same type, different patients' tumors respond differently to chemotherapeutic drugs.Without individualized testing, it's difficult to determine which drugs are best for patients who don't respond to standard therapies.
Add Your Opinion
Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.
If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.
All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)
Contact Our News Editors
For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.
![]()
Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:
Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.





