Many people report symptoms of electromagnetic radiation sickness, WHO
Main Category: Public HealthArticle Date: 12 Sep 2005 - 11:00 PDT
| Patient / Public: | ![]() |
4.39 (61 votes) |
| Healthcare Prof: | ![]() |
4.07 (15 votes) |
| Article Opinions: | 11 posts |
"A lot of people report symptoms similar to yours, and there is even a name for it, electrical hypersensitivity (EHS)", writes Chiyoji Ohkubo of the EMF-radiation project of the World Health Organisation (WHO) in an e-mail to a patient. Though the WHO confirms the problem is serious, there will be a 'fact sheet' by the EMF-project within a few weeks, totally denying the existence of radiation sickness. The information is based on instructions by a working group of five people in Prague, 2004. It reads like a political manifesto, to hush up the epidemic and leave the patients behind without any care.
Symptoms of electromagnetic radiation sickness are for example sleep disturbances, dizziness, heart palpitations, headache, blurry sight, swelling, nausea, a burning skin, vibrations, electrical currents in the body, pressure on the breast, cramps, high blood pressure and general unwell-being. According to many testimonies of victims the symptoms appear in the vicinity of sources of electromagnetic radiation, like GSM- and 3G (UMTS)-antennas, cellphones, DECT wireless telephones and WIFI wireless networks. Many times the experiences are blind. Radiation measurements taken afterwards and investigations show, that the radiation density indeed is increased. Many sufferers find out the relationship with the radiation, when they stay for a while elsewhere, where the symptoms diminish or disappear. When they return home the symptoms immediately appear again. Many of the patients decide to move to another place. Others try to shield themselves against the radiation, for example building a Faraday cage of fine wire mesh.
Canary bird sings again
In one documented case a canary bird did not sing anymore and lost his feathers. The cage was at fifty metres distance from a GSM-antenna. After his owner had put a Faraday cage of fine wire mesh around the cage, shielding against part of the radiation, the bird started singing again and did not pick his skin anymore. So, the symptoms are real and not imaginative. That is confirmed by the co-ordinator of the EMF-radiation project, Michael Repacholi. He says, he has met many people who suffer from radiation sickness and electrical hypersensitivity. "I know how much it affects people and that the symptoms are real", he writes. But the EMF-project refuses to comment the many thrustworthy and verifiable testimonies. Repacholi says it is his responsibility, to tell the public that the problems do not exist, since science can not find 'electrosensitivity' in people. Of course not. Humans do not have a sense for the electromagnetic radiation of the relevant frequencies.
Secretariat only
Information for the public
The information leaflet will be a political document, though it is called 'fact sheet'. It gives information for the general public, the medical world and the governments. The instructions for the public: the symptoms of electromagnetic radiation sickness exist, but it is not allowed to attribute them to radiation. Electrical hypersensitivity (EHS) should not be registered or investigated. The public should be warned against products to measure radiation density and to shield against electromagnetic radiation from GSM- and 3G (UMTS)-antennas, DECT wireless telephones, WIFI wireless networks etcetera. Measurements are to be discouraged. There should not be made any correlation between the symptoms and following diseases and disabilities. The public should be reminded that only ionisating radiation, X-rays and radioactive radiation, is considered to be able to damage health. The symptoms of electromagnetic radiation sickness should be interpreted as the consequences of stress by the introduction of new technologies.
No diagnosis, no classification
The political message is clear. Health problems caused by electromagnetic radiation are not allowed to exist, even if a lot of people report them in thrustworthy and verifiable testimonies. The base of the coming information leaflet is a political document. Governments are instructed to develop tailored information for medical practitioners. The working group writes, that governments are not allowed to propose an official diagnosis, nor to introduce a classification for handicap status. That is a reaction to Sweden, where the Federation of Electrical Hypersensitive (FEB) is a member of the umbrella organization of federations of handicapped. Indirectly FEB receives some funds from the government. A few hospitals in Sweden even have a radiation free room. Governments who ignore the instructions of the WHO, are accused by Repacholi to foster victimisation and "to perpetuate a myth". Institutions who take the reports of citizens seriously, get a warning shot across the bows.
Appropriate interaction
The EMF-project makes a small exception. The instructions say the symptoms may be registered, as Idiopathic Environmental Intolerance attributed to Electro Magnetic Fields (IEI-EMF). But the political instructions continue. Governments have to make an end to measurements of radiation densities and structures. They have to develop 'appropriate interaction' with self-help groups. At last governments have to promote dialogue, to take away the anxiousness about the electromagnetic radiation sickness. After reading these instructions the questions are: how do the lots of reports by people who are sick by electromagnetic radiation relate to this 'fact sheet'? Why WHO refuses to give comment on the many thrustworthy and verifiable testimonies and cases? Why are these reports not registered and investigated?
Epidemiological research
The scientific foundations of the instructions and the leaflet are weak. Like with asbestos the only research that can give proof is epidemiological research, because electromagnetic radiation is a man-made environmental factor. According to the website http://www.stopumts.nl of Etwald Goes all epidemiologic research until now found negative impact on well-being and health, from sleep disturbances to death. Moreover, it is impossible that the negative impact does not exist, since more than half of the in vitro and in vivo laboratory and provocative research finds damage. Such investigations can never fully represent true life with all the parameters of permanent exposure of living people, animals and plants. However, if most of these investigations show a negative impact, something must be the matter. Indeed there is a problem, according to the lots of reports WHO mentions.
Swiss study
Politicians should play the ball now. A growing amount of municipalities takes the anxiousness of citizens seriously, but they don't register or investigate the reports of electromagnetic radiation sickness. Politicians are not much interested in this part of public health. They wait for the results of a study in Switzerland, about 3G (UMTS) and well-being. Coordinator Peter Achermann: "we are currently in the process of analyzing the data. We hope to have a publication ready by the end of 2005." Before he warned the politicians that whatever are the results of the study, it does not say anything about postponed effects and the consequences of permanent radiation. It has been established already, that these effects exist. In a report for T-Mobile by the J'lich Institute of May 9 2005, the experts report effects on the central nervous system, cerebral bloodflow, neuronal activity, EEG, working of the brain and cognitive function. The European Reflex study found damage to DNA, which is an confirmation of earlier research and has been confirmed afterwards.
Political manifesto
Scientifically the harmfulness of electromagnetic radiation is proven, based on the many testimonies and anamneses, epidemiological research and most of the laboratory and provocative research. Nevertheless, the EMF-project of the WHO denies the existence of electromagnetic radiation sickness and even promotes the non-existence, though many scientists give a warning. The EMF-project works together with scientists who serve the wireless providers, not even keeping the appearance of independency. They simply do not take notion of or wipe away the epidemiologic research and make laboratory studies cancel each other out, which is scientifically inadmissible. The 'fact sheet' therefore is not a scientifically responsible and independent document. The information leaflet is based on instructions by a working group of only five people, organised by and participated by the EMF-project itself. It is reasonable to call it a political manifesto.
Sources:
correspondence with Chiyoji Ohkubo, Michael Repacholi of the EMF-project, WHO, Geneva
correspondence with Peter Achermann of the Institute of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Zurich
'Bobje zingt weer' (canary bird sings again) in Dutch newspaper De Telegraaf, August 19 2005
sauvonsleon.fr (42 testimonies in French around one antenna installation)
stopumts.nl (questions about health and radiation: email info@stopumts.nl)
who.int/peh-emf/meetings/hypersens_wgrep_oct04.pdf (page 8)
http://www.feb.se and many other websites, like microwavenews.com
unizh.ch/phar/sleep/handy/tnostatement.htm
Written by Frans van Velden
Frans is an accredited journalist
Questions about this press article: e-mail fransp@dds.nl
Visit our public health section for the latest news on this subject.
MLA
10 Feb. 2012. <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/30499.php>
APA
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/30499.php.
Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.
|
Rate this article: (Hover over the stars then click to rate) |
Patient / Public: |
or |
Health Professional: |
Visitor Opinions In Chronological Order (11)
Electromagnetic fields made me sick
posted by ehs on 13 Sep 2005 at 3:55 pmI am a French electrosensitive person.
Me, too
posted by MJ on 15 Oct 2005 at 12:58 pmI experienced EHS yesterday when I was in a computer lab. It lasted for several hours. It's not the first time either.
Can one lessen the effects?
posted by Beernard on 2 Jul 2010 at 5:57 pmNever occured to me...but for these past several months I have zeroed the culprit for my friend's symptoms to be her laptop's wifi..her symptoms started as insignificant feelings of general unwell and strange vibrations/palpitations on the chest. Erratic breathing...Now everytime she tuns on her laptop's wifi the symptoms are back after a couple minutes exposure and immediately dissaappear if the wifi's switched off. It is like a switch and I have no doubt whatsoever it is the wifi! That is if she stays within the immediate area of the laptop...So how does one access the internet via wifi without adverse effect or at least how do you lessen the effects?
Electro-sensitive person
posted by Susan Terry on 10 Aug 2010 at 12:27 amI too, have this sensitivity. I was living by some major power lines and I recently moved to get away from them. I'm still having reactions to my computer and large appliances in my home and especially in stores near the refrideration. Now when I go by those power lines, I get brain zaps, dizzy, and headaches. . Something needs to be done to make this known, there are grade schools near those same powerlines. Is there anything we can do to cure this besides avoidance? I would be willing to volunteer for any research studies. Thank you for this article.
Check out Subliminal Distraction first.
posted by L K Tucer on 18 Aug 2010 at 1:07 pmBefore you decide you have sensitivity to EMR examine your activities to determine if your symptoms are not actually caused by Subliminal Distraction exposure.
The symptoms listed by the posts to this thread could be SD exposure.
The problem was discovered and solved forty years ago but almost no one is aware it exists. Office workers using the first modern workstations began to have mental breaks. It was determined to be the vision startle reflex and the cubicle designed to deal with it by 1968.
Using a laptop where others can move in your peripheral vision will allow exposure. The repeating failed attempts to trigger the startle reflex will color thought and reason creating fear, paranoia, panic attacks, depression, thoughts of suicide, strange skin sensations, memory loss. and psychosomatic medical symptoms.
The Wi-Fi problem in Ontario is this phenomenon. Video on CBC News shows school children using computers in unprotected workspace, without Cubicle Level Protection.
Just an observation
posted by David Isakson on 20 Aug 2010 at 10:45 amNot to belittle the people that claim to be sensitive to these signals, but perhaps the health community is rejecting the notion of emf-radiation sickness because the symptoms seem to fit dehydration and mal-nutrition. Hence they think it's the person's fault that they are in the condition they are in.
I'm constantly exposed to wifi and cell phone signals. My cell phone is in my pocket and I work perhaps 20 feet from a wireless router. My wife is a heart patien and has a pacer defibulator and we get no adverse effects from our home wifi network or our cell phones. And the only time that I feel any of these symptoms is when I haven't been drinking enough water or eating right.
I'm not saying that wifi sickness or whatever you want to call it isn't real. It's just that I have not observed any effects that I can conclusively link to emf radiation. And so far I have not seen anything other than articles claiming that it is real.
My visit in Boulder Dam, Nevada
posted by Isolt on 17 Jan 2011 at 8:34 pmSome time ago I went to see the Hoover Dam in southern Nevada. Half way down descending into the depth of Grand Canyon, I started to feel anxious and nervous. The closer I came to the dam with its power generating machines the stronger my anxiety grew, until it became a full blown panic attack. I am a very sensitive person and easily affected by changes in my environment. I could not stay down there any longer time and was extremely happy to get out of that pit alive.
Bad habits gave me it
posted by LiE on 16 Feb 2011 at 7:18 pmI have terrible habits like reading pdf books on my laptop and having it on my hip for several hours in a day. I also do this with movie watching, which end up being 2-3 hour movies with it position on my hips. I have the habit of putting it on one of my heel area too.
I have severe vibrations, which made me unable to sleep until 2-3 hours later. It took a week or more for it to go away with reducing my laptop on my body. I had the vibration for a good month or longer.
Now have the vibration sensation, anal bleeding, trouble sleeping, depression, body pains and heart beating fast. This is the third time having this sensation, it a good thing that my body is getting used to it but I guess it hurting my body silently.
Ny doctors say i can't do nothing and he can't do nothing about it. so i try to reduce my radiation intake as much as possible to get rid of it. it serious is a real problem and it sad their won't do anything.
not nutritional-related here
posted by Heather on 26 Feb 2011 at 4:02 pmI have had this problem numerous times. Its terrible. And to address the person speaking of hydration and malnutrition....I drink coconut water daily in the morning for hydration, in addition I juice 3-4 glasses of fresh vegtables daily. I go through 20 pounds of apples, 20 pounds of carrots, immeasurable amounts of greens, etc etc, all in a week. I def get all my nutients.
compact fluorescent light bulbs
posted by Audrey on 16 Nov 2011 at 1:41 amI became ill unexpectedly after happily putting the compact fluorescent light bulbs in my house very close to my head as that was where my lights were. No doctors knew what was wrong and eventually a scientist sent my symptoms around the world and I was diagnosed as electrosensitive. I have used a German machine called the Cyber Trone via a therapist and this is very effective at rebalancing the imbalance that EMR inflicts on our bodies. The treatment is a bit expensive but well worth doing to help you to tolerate the escalating rollout of radiation in our world but we also need to keep campaigning for authorities to recognise the risks and to organise a safer environment for us all.
First 10 opinions shown. For all opinions, click through to the full thread.
Add Your Opinion
Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.
If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.
All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)
Contact Our News Editors
For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.
![]()
Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:
Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.





