Deep vein thrombosis prevention is ignored in UK hospitals
Main Category: VascularAlso Included In: Preventive Medicine
Article Date: 03 Nov 2005 - 15:00 PDT
| Patient / Public: | ![]() |
5 (1 votes) |
| Healthcare Prof: | ![]() |
4 (1 votes) |
| Article Opinions: | 1 posts |
Venous thromboembolism in patients, also known as deep vein thrombosis (DVT) due to its common manifestation in the deep veins of the legs, is being ignored in UK hospitals despite clear, evidence-based guidelines on the use of preventative treatments.
The findings, which are published in the November edition of the Journal of Royal Society of Medicine, follow a 24-month survey on medical inpatients in two major English teaching hospitals.
Deep vein thrombosis rose in prominence due to its association with long-haul flights, however, venous thromboembolism (VTE) is the most preventable cause of mortality in hospitalised medical inpatients. It is a potentially fatal condition with an annual incidence of 1-3 per 1000 per year and contributes to approximately 10% of all hospital deaths in the UK.
The study assessed 1062 patients of which 89% were found to have moderate and high risk of developing VTE. Of this category, 71% did not receive any form of prophylaxis. Of the 29% who did, prophylaxis was implemented correctly in only 4% of moderate and high-risk patients. Presentations about the recommended guidelines to fellow clinicians, after the first round of data collection, only increased use of prophylaxis to 31%.
The survey noted that the under utilisation of prophylaxis in medical inpatients was in marked contrast to the practice on many surgical wards.
Lead researcher, Dr Abdul Shlebak, said the situation was unsatisfactory.
"Clinicians and policymakers need to act on these findings if we are to reduce the incidence of VTE and prevent fatalities in hospitals," said Dr Shlebak.
Amongst the authors' recommendations are: a DVT tick sheet attached to drug charts for all patients when admitted; greater understanding of DVT in medical and nursing education; and establishing dedicated antithrombotic teams charged with the task of raising awareness and auditing prophylaxis rates.
An accompanying editorial in the JRSM describes the current low level of thromboprophylaxis in UK hospitals as unacceptable and urges physicians to take greater responsibility by being aware of the evidence on VTE and act accordingly.
'Venous thromboprophylaxis in UK medical inpatients' by ST Rachid, MR Thursz, NA Razvi, R Voller, T Orchard and AA Shlebak is published in the November 2005 issue (volume 98) of the Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine.
JRSM is the flagship journal of the Royal Society of Medicine. It has been published continuously since 1809. Its Editor is Dr Kamran Abbasi.
http://www.rsm.ac.uk
Visit our vascular section for the latest news on this subject.
MLA
15 Feb. 2012. <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/32788.php>
APA
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/32788.php.
Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.
|
Rate this article: (Hover over the stars then click to rate) |
Patient / Public: |
or |
Health Professional: |
Visitor Opinions In Chronological Order (1)
Anon
posted by Anon on 12 May 2009 at 1:53 pmI am a registered nurse having qualified in 1984. My mum was admitted to a Welsh hospital last year with pneumonia. having previously suffered a DVT on a previous admission - this was emphasised when admitted. Nothing was done to prevent DVT until two days later and a fuss was made: then heparin was prescribed and a reluctant physio turned up for 5 mins per day (nothing done by the nursing staff in the intervening hours). My mum died from a pulmonary embolism that I consider to have been entirely avoidable. Why is it that private hospitals proudly display their tallies of DVT's and PE's but it seems that no records are kept about the numbers in NHS hospitals? Needless to say this matter is an ongoing complaint.
Add Your Opinion
Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.
If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.
All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)
Contact Our News Editors
For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.
![]()
Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:
Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.




