Asbestos Still Being Used In USA, Despite The Known Risks
Main Category: Asbestos / MesotheliomaAlso Included In: Cancer / Oncology; Public Health
Article Date: 06 Feb 2006 - 16:00 PDT
| Patient / Public: | ![]() |
4 (6 votes) |
| Healthcare Prof: | ![]() |
3 (2 votes) |
| Article Opinions: | 2 posts |
The February edition of CancerWire focuses on the continued presence of a carcinogen that will stun many Americans - asbestos the well known carcinogenic mineral is still being used in the U.S. and this deadly mineral can be found in over 30 million homes and schools. These revelations and others were provided during a recent interview with Linda Reinstein of the Asbestos Disease Awareness Organization (ADAO).
Asbestos Diseases are Incurable
When her husband Alan was diagnosed with a deadly cancer (mesothelioma) which is caused by asbestos, Linda Reinstein decided to take a stand. She turned her anger into action and co-founded the Asbestos Disease Awareness Organization (ADAO). Today, ADAO is an international organization that has representatives throughout the world and offers support, resources and education for a growing community of patients and caregivers.
Ms. Reinstein wants more Americans to know about asbestos so they can protect themselves and avoid being diagnosed with an incurable disease like her husband. "Asbestos can cause or contribute to cancers such as mesothelioma, lung, larynx, esophageal, and stomach cancer and many non-malignant diseases such as asbestosis and chronic pulmonary respiratory disease. Ten thousand lives are lost in the U.S. every year to all asbestos-related disease. Each case is incurable and often deadly and every case could have been prevented because the dangers of this mineral were known in the early 1900's," Ms. Reinstein explained. This enormous death toll may actually be under-reported because asbestos diseases are usually hard to diagnose. Many victims will die of cardiac failure or pneumonia and are never diagnosed with an asbestos related disease.
No Asbestos Ban?
In 1989, the EPA announced an asbestos ban and phase out. But in 1990, the ban was overturned by a U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals. "So we don't have an actual ban on asbestos, but instead a regulation to reduce exposure," said Reinstein. "Asbestos is allowed in certain concentrations. For example, under OSHA, an employee cannot be exposed to more than 0.1 asbestos fibers per cubic centimeter of air for an average eight hour work day. But, this gets confusing because how does a consumer know if a given product fits within those guidelines?" According to Reinstein these regulations may not even matter because the EPA has repeatedly stated that there is no safe level of asbestos exposure.
In addition to having asbestos present in new products and materials, an estimated 30 million homes, schools and offices are already contaminated with the mineral. So construction, repair, or demolition in older structures can lead to exposure as we saw on 9/11 with the World Trade Center. "One life lost to an asbestos related disease is tragic; hundreds of thousands of lives lost is unconscionable. While we can't reclaim the lives of our loved ones, we can make the world a better place for those who come after us." Reinstein concluded.
The entire interview will soon be available at http://www.cancermonthly.com
Visit our asbestos / mesothelioma section for the latest news on this subject.
MLA
15 Feb. 2012. <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/37163.php>
APA
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/37163.php.
Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.
|
Rate this article: (Hover over the stars then click to rate) |
Patient / Public: |
or |
Health Professional: |
Visitor Opinions In Chronological Order (2)
The cost
posted by Rick on 17 Feb 2011 at 3:07 amOut of nowhere my mother currently declining in health rapidly was diagnosed with mesthelioma. For what? A building material? Maybe she had a lousy factory job years ago and for some Christmas money now this? Futhermore I find the navy has a checkered past with the junk and I was in for five years. Its mass murder and though sounding silly needs a Oprah episode to bring it to light. Is it so hard to pull your heads from your behinds and say get rid of the stuff wherever it is? Pay the cost to save lives, the president needs to step up as its a blight on humanity and shows that some people have none.
What?
posted by Ron Lentjes on 25 Jul 2011 at 2:58 pmUm so they ban a perfectly safe product called the INCANDESCENT LIGHT BULB and push for an unsafe CFL containing mercury and giving off light with way way higher UV content and very annoying light (blue-white crappy not really-white) light. And yet stop the ban of ASBESTOS??? Pardon moi? It's all lies. I'll give you a hint: $$$PROFIT$$$. I say: STOP THE BAN OF INCANDESCENTS and continue the BAN OF ASBESTOS. Oh sorry, that just makes to much SENSE and not enough $$$DOLLARS$$$ err $$$TRILLIONS$$$. Cheers, Ron Lentjes.
Add Your Opinion
Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.
If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.
All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)
Contact Our News Editors
For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.
![]()
Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:
Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.





