New National Guidelines Recommend Safer IV Catheter Securement
Main Category: Nursing / MidwiferyAlso Included In: Medical Devices / Diagnostics; MRSA / Drug Resistance
Article Date: 17 Feb 2006 - 12:00 PDT
| Patient / Public: | ![]() |
5 (1 votes) |
| Healthcare Prof: | ![]() |
4.71 (7 votes) |
| Article Opinions: | 1 posts |
Major new guidelines from the Infusion Nurses Society for the first time state a preference for a particular method of securing/stabilizing catheters.
"Whenever feasible,"" the new Standards state, "using a manufactured catheter stabilization device is preferred." The INS Standards no longer list nonsterile tape or suture as acceptable methods of catheter stabilization.
In a related change to the INS Standards, the guidelines for controlling catheter-related infections now recommend the evaluation of catheter stabilization devices to reduce infections.
The StatLock® IV safety device is the only evidence-based catheter stabilization device that meets the new national standards. Devices like StatLock are also covered in guidelines and publications issued by the CDC, JCAHO, OSHA (for needlestick safety), and the National Patient Safety Foundation.
INS is the world's leading medical society dedicated to IV infusion and IV safety, and does not endorse or recommend specific products.
Two new articles in the INS publication, Journal of Infusion Nursing, detail eight studies favorably comparing StatLock to nonsterile tape and suture for catheter stabilization.
Catheter placement and securement are the most common invasive medical procedures. There are 300 million peripheral IV catheters sold in the U.S. each year, according to industry analysts, plus millions more central venous, arterial and urinary catheters.
Journal of Infusion Nursing
Visit our nursing / midwifery section for the latest news on this subject.
MLA
14 Feb. 2012. <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/37932.php>
APA
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/37932.php.
Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.
|
Rate this article: (Hover over the stars then click to rate) |
Patient / Public: |
or |
Health Professional: |
Visitor Opinions In Chronological Order (1)
Study shows a single product acceptable?
posted by C Gardner on 17 Feb 2006 at 3:43 pmWhile always interested in good securement, I have to be very skeptical of any 'impartial' recommendation/standard that leaves a single, commercial product available for use. Have to hate seeing research directed by commercialism.
Add Your Opinion
Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.
If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.
All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)
Contact Our News Editors
For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.
![]()
Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:
Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.



